Gho X-Layer Activation

The proposal description details a multi-step specification: configuring CCIP lanes with specific rate-limit parameters (1.5M GHO capacity, 300 GHO/sec), and configuring the GhoCcipSteward and GhoBucketSteward contracts, alongside a table of new X-Layer contract addresses. However, the decoded on-chain action set contains only a single generic execute() call to a payload contract on Ethereum mainnet, with no internal calldata decoded. This is a common pattern for Aave governance proposals, where the top-level proposal simply triggers a payload contract (as referenced in the 'Implementation' links) that internally performs the detailed cross-chain and steward configuration steps described in the specification. Because the internal logic of the execute() call is not decoded or exposed here, it is not possible to verify whether the specific numeric parameters (1.5M GHO / 300 GHO per second) or the exact addresses match what is actually configured on-chain. There is no evidence of contradiction between the description and the single visible action, but the opacity of the calldata means a rigorous action-by-action comparison cannot be performed. I did not identify any explicit conflicting values or targets, but given the limited visibility into the actual execution logic, confidence in this assessment is low rather than asserting a discrepancy that isn't substantiated by available data.