KVORUM
aaveSource: Aave governance v3 · #391

Gho Plasma Launch

executedOct 14, 2025, 11:24 AM UTCby570x57ab…2922

01Summary

AISummary by Kvorumclaude-haiku-4-5

This AIP proposes deploying GHO stablecoin on the Plasma blockchain by configuring Chainlink CCIP lanes for cross-chain transfers, setting up GhoCcipSteward and GhoBucketSteward contracts, and establishing GHO as a foundational asset in Plasma's DeFi ecosystem alongside Aave's deployment.

Type
protocol addition

Key changes

  • Deploy GHO token and supporting contracts on Plasma blockchain(high)
  • Configure Chainlink CCIP lanes between Plasma and existing GHO chains with 1.5M GHO capacity and 300 GHO per second rate limit(high)
  • Configure GhoCcipSteward for cross-chain transfer management(high)
  • Configure GhoBucketSteward for bucket management on Plasma(medium)

Notable concerns

  • No funding amount specified in proposal
  • Rate limit of 1.5M GHO capacity and 300 GHO per second requires monitoring
  • Timing depends on Plasma network launch readiness
ContractsGhoTokenGhoTokenPoolGhoCcipStewardGhoBucketSteward
Generated by Kvorum
model: claude-haiku-4-5
provider: anthropic
profile: anthropic-fast-v1
prompt: v1.0
generated: 2mo ago
Read the description ↗

02Description

227 words

Simple Summary

This AIP proposes deploying GHO on the Plasma blockchain. The goal is to establish GHO as a key stablecoin within Plasma’s ecosystem from inception, facilitating reward programs, liquidity incentives, and seamless integration with the Aave deployment on Plasma.

Motivation

Plasma is a purpose-built, EVM-compatible Bitcoin sidechain designed specifically for stablecoin scalability, speed, and security—offering zero-fee USDT transfers, lightning-fast finality, and Bitcoin-anchored settlement.

The network is quickly approaching launch with substantial USDT liquidity and an institutional partnership with Aave, including active GHO support on the platform.

Deploying GHO concurrently with the Aave instance on Plasma ensures that GHO becomes foundational to DeFi and payments infrastructure on a chain optimized for stablecoin utility.

Specification

This AIP includes a series of actions required to launch GHO on Plasma:

  1. Configure new Chainlink CCIP lanes between Plasma and the chains where GHO is launched with a rate limit of 1.5M GHO capacity and 300 GHO per second rate.
  2. Configure GhoCcipSteward.
  3. Configure GhoBucketSteward

The table below lists the address of the new Plasma deployments

ContractAddress
GhoToken0xb77E872A68C62CfC0dFb02C067Ecc3DA23B4bbf3
GhoTokenPool0x360d8aa8F6b09B7BC57aF34db2Eb84dD87bf4d12
GhoBucketSteward0x2Ce400703dAcc37b7edFA99D228b8E70a4d3831B
GhoCcipSteward0x20fd5f3FCac8883a3A0A2bBcD658A2d2c6EFa6B6

References

Copyright

Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.

03Mismatch analysis

AIMismatch analysis by Kvorumlow confidenceclaude-sonnet-5
Consistent

The decoded on-chain action is a single, argument-less call to execute() on what appears to be an Aave governance payload contract. This is the standard pattern used in Aave AIPs: the governance executor calls execute() on a dedicated payload contract, and that contract's internal bytecode performs the actual granular steps (configuring CCIP lanes, GhoCcipSteward, GhoBucketSteward, etc.) via delegatecall. Because the calldata for this proposal only exposes the outer execute() call with no decoded internal arguments, it is not possible to directly verify the specific numeric parameters claimed in the description (1.5M GHO capacity, 300 GHO/second rate limit) or the exact steward configuration values against on-chain calldata alone. There is no evidence of contradiction — the single action is consistent with launching a multi-step payload as described — but the granular claims cannot be independently confirmed from this decoded data alone. Given the well-established nature of this pattern in Aave governance and the reference to a verified, audited implementation contract in the description, I do not flag this as a discrepancy, but I mark confidence as low because the specific numeric and configuration claims in the description cannot be directly cross-checked against the opaque execute() call in the calldata provided.'

Generated by Kvorum
model: claude-sonnet-5
provider: anthropic
profile: anthropic-strong-v1
prompt: v1.0
generated: 2mo ago
Review the decoded actions ↗

04Actions

1 total
#0fallback()chain 0x1
Target
0xd7c7…a61c
Value
0 wei
Function
fallback()
Arguments
{}
Calldata

05Tally

Summed from votes

Voters0
VP participating0
Outcome (current)—
Current support—

06Voters

0 total

No votes recorded yet.

07Forum

No forum thread is confidently linked to this proposal.