Remove USDS as collateral and increase RF across all Aave Instances
01Summary
Proposal to remove USDS as collateral across all Aave instances by setting LTV to 0%, reduce USDS supply and borrow caps by 80%, increase USDS reserve factor from 10% to 25%, reduce DAI LTV to 0% across multiple chains, and remove USDS from multiple eMode categories. Rationale: USDS revenue has declined sharply (from $244k Q1 to $18k Q4 2024) and is too low to justify risk exposure; issuance model changes introduce unacceptable risks for collateral.
- Type
- parameter change
Key changes
- Remove USDS as collateral by setting LTV to 0% on Ethereum Core(high)
- Increase USDS reserve factor from 10% to 25% on Ethereum Core and Prime instances to boost revenue by ~150%(high)
- Reduce USDS supply cap from 800M to 160M on Ethereum Core and from 200M to 40M on Prime(high)
- Reduce USDS borrow cap from 360M to 144M on Ethereum Core and from 180M to 36M on Prime(high)
- Set DAI LTV to 0% across Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche, Arbitrum, Ethereum Core, and Metis(high)
- Reduce DAI supply and borrow caps across multiple instances (Ethereum Core, Optimism, Metis)(medium)
- Remove USDS from 12 eMode categories across Core and Prime instances(medium)
Notable concerns
- USDS revenue declined 93% from Q1 2024 ($244k) to Q4 2024 ($18k), indicating insufficient profitability to justify collateral exposure
- Sky ecosystem changes including new credit lines at low or zero cost and new yield strategies increase USDS risk profile beyond acceptable levels for Aave collateral
- Proposal significantly reduces USDS supply and borrow caps (80% reduction), which may impact users with positions using USDS as collateral
Generated by Kvorum
02Description
Simple Summary
This AIP proposes removing USDS as collateral and increasing RF across all Aave instances.
USDS generates negligible revenue while its issuance model introduces asymmetric risks that could impact Aave’s stability.
Motivation
Motivation for these changes is driven by both reducing revenue from USDS borrows, and changing risk profile bringing into doubt the suitability of the asset as collateral.
1. Low Profitability
Data shows a decline in revenue each month, with $543,528 since Q1 2025, and current annualised revenue of $135,260 based on revenue since the beginning of Q4. With quarterly revenue data showing a sharp decline since the beginning of the year, we believe that current revenue is far below the scale required to justify current risk exposure.
| Instance | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cove V3 | $87,948 | $127,768 | $96,556 | $17,417 |
| Prime V3 | $156,205 | $47,999 | $9,276 | $359 |
| Total | $244,153 | $175,767 | $105,832 | $17,776 |
To combat this decline in revenue we propose raising RF to 25% which would increase Aave revenue by +150% on the same borrow volume.
2. Potential Risks from Issuance Model
With the new Stars being created within the Sky ecosystem, the risk profile of USDS is changing. Given these changes characterised by credit lines at low or zero cost, and the risk surface area presented by the yield strategies being utilised, we believe that the risk profile has increased to a degree which is outside of what is acceptable for Aave collateral.
Alongside the increase in RF we propose setting LTV to 0% in order to remove Aave’s exposure to USDS as collateral. Combined, we believe these measures bring the risk/reward of USDS back in line with other assets on Aave.
Specification
| Instance | Asset | Current Max LTV | Recommended Max LTV |
|---|---|---|---|
| Optimism | DAI | 63% | 0% |
| Polygon | DAI | 63% | 0% |
| Avalanche | DAI.e | 63% | 0% |
| Arbitrum | DAI | 63% | 0% |
| Ethereum Core | DAI | 63% | 0% |
| Ethereum Core | USDS | 75% | 0% |
| Metis | m.DAI | 63% | 0% |
| Asset | Chain | Current Supply Cap | Recommended Supply Cap | Current Borrow Cap | Recommended Borrow Cap | Current RF | Recommended RF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USDS | Ethereum Core | 800,000,000 | 160,000,000 | 360,000,000 | 144,000,000 | 10% | 25% |
| USDS | Ethereum Prime | 200,000,000 | 40,000,000 | 180,000,000 | 36,000,000 | 10% | 25% |
| DAI | Ethereum Core | 338,000,000 | 200,000,000 | 271,000,000 | 180,000,000 | - | - |
| DAI | OP Mainnet | 10,000,000 | 2,000,000 | 7,000,000 | 1,800,000 | - | - |
| m.DAI | Metis | 1,000,000 | 200,000 | 900,000 | 180,000 | - | - |
Moreover USDS will be removed from the following emodes:
Core:
- USDe_sUSDe__USDC_USDT_USDS (id:2)
- sUSDe_PT_sUSDE_31JUL2025__USDC_USDT_USDS (id: 8)
- PT_eUSDE_29MAY2025_eUSDe__USDC_USDT_USDS (id: 9)
- USDe_PT_USDe_31JUL2025__USDC_USDT_USDS (id: 10)
- USDe__USDC_USDT_USDS (id: 11)
- PT_eUSDE_14AUG2025_eUSDe__USDC_USDT_USDS (id: 13)
- eUSDe__USDC_USDT_USDS (id: 15)
- sUSDe_PT_sUSDE_31JUL2025_PT_sUSDE_25SEP2025__USDC_USDT_USDe_USDS_USDtb (id: 17)
- USDe_PT_USDe_31JUL2025_PT_eUSDE_14AUG2025_PT_USDe_25SEP2025__USDC_USDT_USDe_USDS (id: 19)
- sUSDe_PT_sUSDE_25SEP2025_PT_sUSDE_27NOV2025__USDC_USDT_USDe_USDS_USDtb (id: 24)
- PT_USDe_25SEP2025_PT_USDe_27NOV2025__USDC_USDT_USDe_USDS_USDtb (id: 27)
Prime:
- ezETH__USDS_USDC_GHO (id: 2)
- rsETH__USDS_USDC_GHO (id: 6)
References
- Implementation: AaveV3Ethereum, AaveV3EthereumLido, AaveV3Polygon, AaveV3Avalanche, AaveV3Optimism, AaveV3Arbitrum, AaveV3Metis
- Tests: AaveV3Ethereum, AaveV3EthereumLido, AaveV3Polygon, AaveV3Avalanche, AaveV3Optimism, AaveV3Arbitrum, AaveV3Metis
- Snapshot
- Discussion
Copyright
Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.
03Mismatch analysis
The proposal description is a detailed, standard Aave risk-parameter AIP: it proposes setting USDS (and correlated DAI-variant) LTVs to 0% across seven instances, raising RF on USDS to 25% on Ethereum Core/Prime, reducing supply/borrow caps, and removing USDS from several e-mode categories. However, the decoded on-chain calldata only reveals two generic execute() (fallback) calls to two contract addresses on Ethereum mainnet — these are almost certainly calls to the AaveV3Ethereum and AaveV3EthereumLido payload contracts referenced in the proposal's implementation links, which in turn contain the granular logic (including bridged calls to Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche, Arbitrum, and Metis governance receivers). This is the standard architecture for Aave cross-chain governance proposals, where the top-level DAO vote only directly invokes one or two payload executors on mainnet, and the rest of the multi-chain configuration is delegated internally. Since no parameter values (LTV %, RF %, caps, e-mode removals) are decoded in the calldata provided, I cannot directly verify each numeric claim against on-chain data — but this opacity is typical and expected for this proposal type, not indicative of a mismatch or malicious redirection. There is no evidence of target mismatch, extra actions, or omitted major actions beyond what is normal boilerplate for this governance pattern. Given the very limited decoded action-level detail, my confidence in this comparison is low, but I found no basis to flag a genuine discrepancy — the visible actions (two execute calls to known payload-style contracts) are consistent with what the description implies (multi-instance risk parameter updates).
Discrepancies
- lowomitted in description
The decoded calldata only shows two opaque execute() calls to payload contracts on Ethereum mainnet, with no visible parameters for the LTV, RF, cap, or e-mode changes described in the proposal. This is consistent with Aave's standard governance pattern where a top-level AIP calls payload contracts that internally execute the detailed cross-chain configuration changes (including bridging messages to other networks like Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche, Arbitrum, and Metis). Because the actual parameter changes are not decoded here, a reviewer cannot independently verify that the LTV=0%, RF=25%, or cap reductions match the prose from calldata alone.
Generated by Kvorum
04Actions
- Target
- 0x281e…550a
- Value
- 0 wei
- Function
- fallback()
- Arguments
{}- Calldata
- Target
- 0x7d94…54c5
- Value
- 0 wei
- Function
- fallback()
- Arguments
{}- Calldata
05Tally
Summed from votes
06Voters
| Voter | Choice | % of total | Rationale | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EA0xea0c…6b5a | For | 333K | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| 570x57ab…2922 | For | 227.8K | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| EZezr3al.eth0x8659…7d0e | For | 141.2K | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| 8B0x8b37…2a22 | For | 74.3K | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| 2C0x2cc1…4df1 | For | 58.5K | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| B90xb933…8dd1 | For | 42.3K | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| EC0xecc2…6ac9 | For | 25K | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| 3D0x3ddc…05b0 | For | 20.1K | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| 8A0x8af7…fa05 | Against | 12.9K | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| 480x48e5…6430 | For | 1.6K | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| A50xa54f…0f31 | Against | 1.3K | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| AA0xaaab…2335 | Against | 752.8 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| 930x93cd…beca | For | 26.5 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| 720x7204…6f00 | For | 15.5 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| 2E0x2ef9…02c6 | For | 11.3 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| 010x010d…4ee4 | For | 1.3 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| 010x0151…c3b9 | Against | 1.2 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| 8B0x8bb9…ccc2 | Against | 1.1 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| 050x0579…4048 | For | 1 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| C50xc554…7759 | For | 1 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| 010x019e…2ee3 | For | 0.3 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| 050x05f7…946c | For | 0.2 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| D00xd0de…b16f | For | 0.2 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| 160x168f…7400 | For | 0.1 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| C80xc8f1…17c2 | For | 0.1 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| 6A0x6a87…21cb | For | 0.1 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| 1C0x1c69…7911 | For | 0.1 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| AF0xaf21…ed16 | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| A90xa97c…ccc8 | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| 2F0x2f2f…f78a | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| 7F0x7f21…31e0 | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| E80xe8ee…0877 | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| AC0xacc9…0b28 | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| 930x93e0…f6ee | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| 140x1475…6e15 | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| E60xe6b8…452d | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| D70xd712…1366 | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| 4D0x4d12…7d7c | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| BE0xbef8…9999 | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| A00xa0d0…604a | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| EE0xee2a…58a7 | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| D20xd248…32ae | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| A60xa6ac…2bf3 | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| 7A0x7a04…17a8 | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| 150x1523…080f | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| 380x38dc…472d | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| 210x21ff…c5a8 | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| ED0xed4c…9508 | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| 470x475e…e10c | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
| D20xd220…0e79 | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 11mo ago |
07Forum
No forum thread is confidently linked to this proposal.
08Similar proposals
- aaveexecutedstablecoin harmonization85%
- aaveexecutedGeneralized LT/LTV Reduction on Aave84%
- aaveexecutedAave V2 Deprecation Update84%
- aaveexecutedConfiguration maintenance83%
- aaveexecutedRisk Parameters for DAI Update83%
- aaveexecutedIncrease Borrow Slope1 to all Stablecoins across all Aave Instances83%
- aaveexecutedStablecoin IR Curve Amendment83%
- aaveexecutedStablecoinIRUpdates83%
- aaveexecutedGeneralized LT/LTV Reductions on Aave V3 Step 282%
- aaveexecutedStablecoin IR Curve Amendment82%