Generalized LT/LTV Reductions on Aave V3 Step 2

The proposal description is detailed and specific, listing exact LTV/LT changes for USDC, USDT, USDC.e, USDbC, and sDAI across nine networks (Ethereum, Gnosis, Base, Scroll, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, BNB, Avalanche). However, the decoded on-chain action set contains only a single top-level call: execute() on a payload contract on Ethereum mainnet, with no arguments. This is the standard pattern for Aave cross-chain governance proposals, where the on-chain payload contract internally performs the granular per-market configurator calls (and dispatches cross-chain messages to other networks) via delegatecall/internal logic that is not exposed in the decoded top-level calldata. Because the decoded action provides no visibility into the specific parameter changes actually being executed, I cannot verify or refute the individual LTV/LT figures, target markets, or the sDAI exception claim against the calldata. Given that this opacity is expected and typical for this proposal type (referencing multiple per-chain Solidity payload files matching the described chains), I do not treat the lack of granular decoding as a discrepancy, but confidence in a line-by-line comparison is low. No contradictions, extra actions, or omissions can be substantiated from the available data.on the DAO.