I compared the prose's claimed scope (IR curve changes for 5 WETH comets and 11 stablecoin comets across 6 chains, plus COMP reward speed changes for 15 comets) against the 10 decoded actions. The calldata only sets borrow/supply slope-low and slope-high values (via Configurator) and deploys/upgrades two Comet proxies, both on Ethereum mainnet — one whose new slope values exactly match the WETH recommendation (0.0155/1.26/0.0216/1.125) and one matching the stablecoin recommendation (0.05/3.4/0.054/3.034). Base rates and kinks are correctly omitted since they are unchanged, which is fine. However, there are two material gaps: (1) the description's entire COMP rewards table describing changes to 15 comets is not reflected in any calldata action — no reward-speed setter is called at all; (2) the description implies this proposal updates curves for many comets across Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Scroll, and Polygon, but the calldata only touches two Ethereum-mainnet comets. This may be intentional if this is genuinely only 'Part 1' covering a subset, but the description does not clarify that only these two comets/chains are in scope for this specific vote, so a delegate reading the tables could reasonably believe the full scope (all comets, all chains, plus rewards) is being enacted now. This is a material discrepancy in scope and completeness, though not evidence of fund diversion or malicious redirection, so I stopped short of 'severe'.'