The proposal describes updating 8 interest-rate-curve parameters for two Comets (USDC and USDT). The calldata, however, only contains setter calls for 3 of those 8 parameters per Comet (Borrow Base, Borrow Slope Low, Supply Slope Low), plus a deployAndUpgradeTo call per Comet that finalizes the configuration change (a standard, expected step for Compound III Comet upgrades and not something that needs separate mention). The values that are set match the described figures closely, with one small exception: the Borrow Slope Low is described as .0333 but is actually set to .033 (33e15), a minor rounding discrepancy. The remaining five parameters (Borrow Kink, Borrow Slope High, Supply Base, Supply Kink, Supply Slope High) are not touched by any calldata action; this is most plausibly because their current on-chain values already match the recommended values, so no setter call is needed — a normal pattern for these types of proposals — but the description doesn't state this explicitly, so a careful reviewer should be aware that not all table rows correspond to an executed action. I could not independently verify that the two target addresses (0xc3d688... and 0x3Afdc9...) actually correspond to the USDC and USDT Comets named in the description, which limits confidence to medium. Overall, the execution is faithful to the intent and magnitude of the description with only a minor value rounding difference and an omission of clarification about parameters left unchanged, so this is a minor discrepancy rather than a material or severe one.