KVORUM
compoundSource: Compound governor bravo · #199

Compound Growth Program

executedDec 8, 2023, 12:25 PM UTCby3F0x3fb1…4c8a

01Summary

AISummary by Kvorumclaude-haiku-4-5

AlphaGrowth proposes a 4-month Compound Growth Program with a total budget of 7,770 COMP (approximately $2.3M USD at typical COMP valuations) to accelerate Compound's business development and marketing. The program includes 2,760 COMP for BD operations and 5,010 COMP for marketing campaigns and growth initiatives, with a focus on V3 adoption, new integrations, and expanding Compound's presence against competitors like Aave.

Type
treasury allocation
Funding
$7770 COMP (exact USD value depends on COMP price at execution)

Key changes

  • Transfer 7,770 COMP to AlphaGrowth (0xc10785fB7b1adD4fD521A27d0d55c5561EEf0940) for the Compound Growth Program(high)
  • Establish BD Fund of 2,760 COMP (690 COMP/month for 4 months) for business development operations including V2 to V3 migrations, wallet/exchange integrations, and custodian partnerships(high)
  • Establish Growth Fund of 5,010 COMP for marketing campaigns (2,760 COMP) and reserve fund (2,250 COMP) to drive user acquisition and V3 awareness(high)
  • Fund targeted marketing efforts including KOL partnerships, paid campaigns, content sponsorships, and co-marketing with integrations to increase Compound's DeFi presence(medium)
  • Measure program success through cost of marketing spend per $1 TVL increase, user acquisition costs by persona, and ROI of different growth strategies(medium)

Notable concerns

  • Program is a 4-month trial with unproven ROI for Compound; success metrics are discovery-focused rather than guaranteed outcomes
  • Unused portions of the Growth Fund will be returned to treasury, but operational BD spend (2,760 COMP) appears fully committed
  • No explicit clawback mechanism or performance requirements specified if deliverables are not met
  • AlphaGrowth operating independently while managing treasury funds raises questions about oversight and accountability
  • Proposed integrations are exploratory targets with no guarantees (e.g., custodian sales cycles typically 18 months, beyond trial period)
Contracts0xc00e94cb662c3520282e6f5717214004a7f26888
Generated by Kvorum
model: claude-haiku-4-5
provider: anthropic
profile: anthropic-fast-v1
prompt: v1.0
generated: 2mo ago
Read the description ↗

02Description

1,930 words

Compound Growth Program

Summary:

AlphaGrowth proposes a Compound Growth Program dedicated to advancing the Compound Protocol through targeted Business Development, Integration, and Marketing Campaigns. The program is structured with a total budget of 7770 COMP, distributed over a 4-month period and allocated into two distinct funds: BD Fund and Growth Fund.

The BD Fund is earmarked at 2760 COMP, with a monthly allocation of 690 COMP, dedicated to supporting Business Development operations for the Compound Growth Program.

The Growth Fund totaling 5010 COMP (2760 Marketing, 2250 Reserve fund), is reserved for incentivizing external parties to engage with and promote Compound in the form of Marketing campaigns and integration funding. It's important to note that AlphaGrowth operates independently of the Growth Fund and any unused portion of this fund will be returned to the Compound treasury upon the program's completion.

The forum post for the proposal can be found here

Background

Our initial intentions were to manage the next cycle of the Compound grants program. However as we chatted with more delegates, it became clear that Compound needed a small grants program and a concurrent growth program to onboard new users with successive developments. A missing part in Compound's operations is the focus on growth/BD-related activities. Compound already has other areas covered thanks to reliable partners in analytics, grants, and security.

  • Security: Entrusted to OpenZeppelin.
  • Risk: Managed by Gauntlet.
  • Grants: Handled by the Compound Grants Program (CGP).
  • Growth: Currently unaddressed.

In many cases, ecosystems and protocols have an internal BD team to manage the growth activities. However without a dedicated team and resources to focus on growth, Compound has not been able to keep up with its competitors (like Aave). The growth program will ensure that Compound will keep up with the industry while still maintaining the conservative nature of the protocol.

Proposal

The Compound Growth program, a trial spanning over a period of 4 months will focus on key areas of growth for Compound Protocol. The Growth program has 2 main areas of focus, BD and Marketing. The AlphaGrowth team has spent the last 6 months discussing the growth requirements of Compound with various community members, delegates and other stakeholders. The program will be a trial run to identify the compatibility of a growth program for Compound. Additionally, this program will test several different strategies of sustainable growth for Compound.

Scope

Marketing

  • Publicizing Compound Protocol: Increasing Compound’s presence in the DeFi space
  • V3 Awareness: Increase general community awareness about V3 and its benefits over V2
  • Co-marketing: For new integrations of Compound with other platforms, marketing the integration to both the communities and DeFi ecosystem at large to engage new Compound users.
  • Marketing : Paid marketing campaigns to engage new audiences

Business Development

  • Increase V3 reach: Many Compound integrations are not on V3; our efforts will push more integrations from V2 to V3
  • Compound Markets: We will integrate Compound markets with a variety of new services. Wallets, Exchanges, custodians, etc.
  • dApp integration: Increasing DeFi applications that will promote activity, users and TVL.

Operations

Over the period of 4 months, the Growth program will engage in the following activities:

Business Development Targets

  • V2 to V3 updating
    • Infrastructure & Services: Applications and no code tools that ease the developer onboarding and deployment of Compound to other apps. Many of these have a V2 api/service live. Our aim will be to integrate V3 with them. Some examples include
      • Ankr
      • Covalent
  • Migrate Existing Pools & Increase Integrations:
    • We will help existing integrations migrate from V2 pools to V3 Pools to increase capital efficiency
      • Argent, which uses V2 pools
      • Crypto.com
      • Pooltogether
  • Integrating Compound onto Wallets & Exchanges
    • New wallet integration Opportunities: Find out wallets worth integrating, focus on wallets with regional presence
    • Integrate Centralized exchanges with Compound Markets
      • Nexo
      • OKX
      • Kucoin
  • Offering Compound services to institutional custodians
    • We will connect with Custodians that provide services to high asset individuals/organizations (Typical sales cycles for custodians are 18 Months, far beyond the trial period of the program, but a successful deal will drastically increase TVL and access to institutional capital)
      • Hex Trust
      • Copper
      • Bitgo
  • Structured Products/dApp Integrations
    • Facilitating new/existing web3 dApps that increase the use of Compound markets/pools. These are highly specific and targeted, typical key targets will be dApps serving to regional users
      • For example - Lemon App that caters to users in LATAM

Marketing

  • Compound Content Creation & Education

    • Compound Labs (being a US-based organization) is restricted in its social media capabilities, so it cannot promote/market many activities on web3 Twitter (Apart from general information sharing through official handle). Compound as a Crypto Platform has limited presence on Social Media; No tweet storms, no widespread sharing and retweeting of information by members.
      • Our plan is to promote key updates about Compound using multiple channels on Twitter
      • Further, we’ll partner with DeFi KOLs to share information about Compound updates, spread the information about Compound in wider community
  • V3 Awareness and Demand Generation

    • We’ll also facilitate steady marketing of V3. Many community members are still unaware of the V3 launch, let alone those outside of the community. We will spread the narrative of enhanced safety and other features of V3.
      • V3 Targeted ad campaigns to compound/aave/balancer follower base
      • Leveraging social media messaging to generate hype
      • Co-marketing for V3 integrations with wallets, exchanges, etc.
  • Event Driven Marketing, Co-Marketing with with Partners and Integrations

    • The team will use events as a major driving factor for the Marketing campaign. Whenever a partnership or integration occurs we will lean in and shout it from the rooftops. Co-marketing grows the pie for both the partner and Compound. We will utilize both Compound’s audience and the partner’s audience to drive adoption and exposure. Some promotion-worthy events include:
      • Compound integration with a new dApp
      • New asset brought to the Compound
      • New chain integration announcement and launch
      • New pool availability
      • New markets on new platforms
    <!---->
    • Native USDC comet on Base chain - marketing extensively to Base and other L2 communities.
    • Compound launch on Linea
  • Paid Campaigns

    • Running multiple campaigns through various channels to promote Compound products
      • KOL promotion: Highly targeted KOL Campaigns for DeFi users
      • AMAs: promoting conversations with high value partners
      • Content Sponsorships: i.e. DeFi edge with 24,000 newsletter readers

Timeline

The original growth program was to span for a period of 6 months. But as discussions on the proposal continued, a consensus was reached on starting first with a trail period. We plan the BD program to run for a time period of 4 months. The main goal of a trial is to test and experiment which activities attribute the most Compound Protocol.

Milestones and Deliverables

The program will focus on the following parameters to measure its success

  • Discovering the of Cost of Marketing Spend to increase $1 of TVL
  • Discovering the User Acquisition Cost per Persona (Whale +$100k, Shark $10k-100k, Minnow under $10k)
  • Discovering the User Acquisition Cost based on Integrations (Wallet, dApp, Structured Product)
  • Discovering which Integrations, Wallets, Partners drive key metrics (Fees, Transactions, Users, Volume, TVL)

Deliverables

  • 1 new V3 infrastructure service provider integration
  • 1 upgrade of V3 infrastructure service provider integration
  • A minimum of 2 sponsored content posts to large audiences such as other DeFi platforms & newsletters
  • A minimum of 5 Co-Marketing campaigns with existing and new partners
  • A minimum of 3 KOL Partnerships
  • A minimum of 5 AMAs organized
  • Begin conversations with key exchanges on integration
  • Begin conversations with at least 40 dApps for integrations
  • Total at least 1,000,000 impressions for marketing campaigns
  • Minimum cumulative integrated dApp users to reach 1000
  • At least 2 new dApp integrations

As we embark on a program to enhance Compound’s growth in the aforementioned metrics, we will be trying out a number of strategies for success. Which makes this an exciting yet challenging task. Not all growth strategies will work, the key aim of the growth program in its trial period will focus on identifying and gathering data on different activities and their rates of success.

a) Finding out which strategies moved the needle for Compound

b) what activities had the highest ROI,

c) identifying the plans that were able to create desirable behavior among target user base.

At the end of the program, we will present this data to the community to evaluate the data. The community should be able to identify, what works, and what doesn’t. What challenges did the growth program encounter during operations?

Funding and Budget

The Compound Growth Program’s budget modeling is similar to Compound Grants Program. The funding ask of the growth program consists of two parts, Operational expenses and the Growth fund.

Operational Expenses

This covers the Growth and BD activities for the program, similar to the Program manager fees on Compound Grants program. This will also include the research activities for the program. Earlier research formed a separate component of the Growth program but after taking suggestions from community members, we included it within the BD part and reduced the scope of research.

The operational expenses for the program are 690 COMP/month

Growth Fund

The growth fund will be the primary vehicle to boost Compound’s presence in the Crypto Communities online. This is similar to the fund of CGP which will be utilized to promote growth via partners.

Why AlphaGrowth

We believe decentralization allows for meritocracy. That holds true in the Compound ecosystem as well. We have firsthand experienced the problems that chains and protocols face in their expansion and integration. Our learnings will be pivotal to identifying the risks and benefits associated in various growth strategies for Compound.

Operating since 2018, AlphaGrowth has years of experience in DeFi and Crypto BD, We have successfully facilitated business development for multiple protocols including Kava, Collab.Land, Sommelier Finance, NEAR, CORE, Aurora, and many others.

In our latest engagement with the Kava grants program, the Kava ecosystem witnessed new integration of 78 projects and a TVL increase of $80+ Million. Our strategies have shown resilience and success throughout the crypto winter. Over the past year, our BD efforts have led to the deployment of over 150 projects on various blockchains. AlphaGrowth gets deals done, even in the bear.

We have interacted with over 100 ecosystems and 2700+ projects. To facilitate BD and grant deployment, our team built a crypto-native CRM and dashboard enabling us to efficiently evaluate and score opportunities, and report progress on all BD efforts.

Where are here for the long haul, and are honored to have the opportunity to be Compound’s boots on the ground.

Impact and Transparency

At AlphaGrowth, we like doing business in public. We welcome any input or feedback from the Compound community on the proposal.

To keep the community informed on the progress, AG will implement the following tasks to guarantee transparency

  • Regular reports through Community call on the progress of BD activities
  • Progress reports highlighting various deals in the pipeline, successful integrations, closed deals and learnings (2 reports)
  • A database that gives all the program specific information to the community so that the members can come, verify and inquire about the process.
  • Post program analysis and report about spends on Development fund.

Links:

Website | Twitter | Linkedin

03Mismatch analysis

AIMismatch analysis by Kvorumclaude-sonnet-5
Consistent

The proposal requests a total budget of 7770 COMP for the Compound Growth Program, to be split internally into a BD Fund and Growth Fund and disbursed over 4 months. The single decoded action is a COMP token transfer() call for exactly 7770 COMP (7770000000000000000000 wei at 18 decimals) to one address. This matches the total requested amount precisely. It is standard practice for governance proposals to transfer the full budget in one lump sum to a program's designated wallet/multisig, which then handles the internal allocation (BD vs Growth fund, monthly tranches) off-chain or via the recipient's own disbursement process — the description does not claim there will be multiple separate on-chain transfers, so the single-transfer structure is a reasonable and expected implementation of the stated intent. The description does not specify the exact recipient address, so there is no basis to flag a target mismatch; the amount fully reconciles with the stated total budget. No omitted actions, no extra actions, and no value mismatches were found. Confidence is high because the numeric match (7770 COMP) is exact and unambiguous, and the single-action nature of the calldata is consistent with typical treasury funding proposals of this type.

Generated by Kvorum
model: claude-sonnet-5
provider: anthropic
profile: anthropic-strong-v1
prompt: v1.0
generated: 2mo ago
Review the decoded actions ↗

04Actions

1 total
#0transfer(address,uint256)chain 0x1
Target
0xc00e…6888
Value
0 wei
Function
transfer(address,uint256)
Arguments
{
  "amount": "7770000000000000000000",
  "address": "0xc10785fB7b1adD4fD521A27d0d55c5561EEf0940"
}
Calldata

05Tally

Summed from votes

Voters0
VP participating0
Outcome (current)—
Current support—

06Voters

0 total

No votes recorded yet.

07Forum

AIForum synthesis by Kvorumclaude-sonnet-5
sentiment · mixedthread · constructive

Arguments for

  • Compound lacks a dedicated internal BD/growth function and needs a third-party partner to keep pace with competitors like Aave.— sharp, bryancolligan
  • AlphaGrowth's brand, data, and 2700+ project network can help 'package' and merchandise Compound to new chains, assets, and partners who want it but don't know how to engage.— bryancolligan
  • The program is complementary to the Compound Grants Program (CGP), with content creation and BD naturally dividing between the two efforts.— allthecolors, sharp
  • Focusing on V3 integrations, co-marketing for new partnerships, and institutional/custodian relationships (e.g., BitGo) can meaningfully grow TVL and users.— robinnagpal, Michigan_Blockchain, bryancolligan
  • A scaled-down trial period (4 months) with reduced budget and narrowed scope is a reasonable way to test AlphaGrowth's fit before committing further.— kevin, sharp, bryancolligan
  • Licensing/GTM strategy work for less-adopted L2s could create an additional revenue stream for Compound via fees or profit-sharing.— robinnagpal

Arguments against

  • Chain integrations are largely unnecessary since chains already have strong incentive to pay for and build Compound integrations themselves at no cost to the DAO.— kevin, allthecolors
  • Asset/token listings aren't bottlenecked by outreach but by risk assessment, so a growth firm doesn't add much value there, and asset teams are already self-funding their own listing efforts.— kevin
  • The requested budget (initially ~18,000 COMP, later still hundreds of thousands of dollars) is too high relative to the actual value AlphaGrowth can add, especially compared to CGP's total funding rate.— kevin, allthecolors
  • A flat monthly retainer creates misaligned incentives and sunk-cost risk given that deals/negotiations take many months; a commission-based structure tied to successful integrations would align incentives better.— Doo
  • KOL-driven marketing is a poor fit for a conservative DeFi protocol like Compound since KOLs are speculation-focused and sometimes associated with promoting scams.— Doo
  • AlphaGrowth lacks the engineering resources to actually execute chain/asset integrations, so research-only services don't address the real bottleneck, which is engineering.— kevin

Unresolved concerns

  • Whether a commission-based (rather than retainer/monthly fee) compensation structure would better align incentives was raised but never adopted or fully resolved.— Doo, sharp
  • The actual efficacy and appropriateness of KOL-based marketing for Compound's user base was questioned without a concrete example or resolution being provided.— Doo
  • How to cleanly divide content-creation/education work between the Growth Program and CGP domains was flagged as a potential overlap that would need ongoing coordination rather than a firm resolution.— allthecolors, sharp
  • The core critique that AlphaGrowth cannot guarantee engineering execution for chain/asset integrations (the real bottleneck) was acknowledged but not fully solved in later proposal revisions.— kevin
  • Details on AlphaGrowth's actual track record/relationships with named custodians and exchanges (Bitgo, Coinbase Prime, Anchorage, Cooper) were only briefly sketched and not substantiated in depth.— Michigan_Blockchain, bryancolligan

Notable participants

  • sharpPrimary proposer who posted and repeatedly revised the Compound Growth Program proposal in response to community feedback.
  • bryancolliganAlphaGrowth founder who directly engaged critics, defended the proposal's value proposition, and negotiated scope/budget changes.
  • kevinMost vocal critical delegate who raised core objections about chain/asset integration value, cost, and engineering bottlenecks, and pushed for a trial period.
  • allthecolorsCGP domain allocator who assessed overlap with the Grants Program and proposed a much smaller trial budget.
  • DooRaised concerns about incentive misalignment (retainer vs. commission) and the appropriateness of KOL marketing.
  • robinnagpalSuggested exploring a licensing/profit-sharing model for Compound deployment on less-adopted L2s.
  • Michigan_BlockchainAsked for more detail on AlphaGrowth's institutional/custodian relationships in the revised proposal.
Generated by Kvorum
model: claude-sonnet-5
provider: anthropic
profile: anthropic-strong-v1
prompt: v1.0
generated: 2mo ago
Open the thread ↗