KVORUM
compoundSource: Compound governor bravo · #150

CGP Hackathon Sponsorships in 2023

executedMar 2, 2023, 09:49 AM UTCby380x38e2…4a68

01Summary

AISummary by Kvorumclaude-haiku-4-5

Compound Grants Program requests $100K (1962.70 COMP) to sponsor three ETHGlobal hackathons (Toronto, New York, and online) in 2023. Funds will cover sponsorship fees, community member passes, and bounty prizes, with the goal of attracting builders to work on specific RFPs in security, multichain/crosschain, and developer tooling domains.

Type
treasury allocation
Funding
$$100,000

Key changes

  • Transfer 1962.70 COMP tokens to Compound Grants Program for hackathon sponsorships(high)
  • Fund participation in ETHGlobal Toronto, New York, and ETHOnline events to attract builders to CGP RFPs(high)
  • Support community member passes ($500-$1,000 per person) and sponsor bounty prizes ($5,000-$10,000 per event)(medium)

Notable concerns

  • Sponsorship impact is uncertain; previous Compound hackathon sponsorships showed limited impact beyond brand recall
  • Travel and lodging stipends explicitly excluded, which may limit participation from some builders
Contracts0xc00e94cb662c3520282e6f5717214004a7f26888
Generated by Kvorum
model: claude-haiku-4-5
provider: anthropic
profile: anthropic-fast-v1
prompt: v1.0
generated: 2mo ago
Read the description ↗

02Description

609 words

CGP Hackathon Sponsorships in 2023

CGP Hackathon Sponsorships in 2023

Authors: Adam, Harsha, CGP-2 Domain Allocators Compound Grants Program seeks an additional $100K (1962.70 COMP) in grants budget to sponsor these ETHGlobal hackathons:

  • ETHGlobal Toronto
  • ETHGlobal New York
  • ETHOnline (Remote)

Please find the community feedback on the proposal here For a better reading experience, please read here

Action: Transfer 1962.70 COMP to 0x8524B12CB7710C75B53bAa9ca72B420542d24C13

Most recent COMP price at the time of proposal submission: $50.95 Token Tracker

CGP seeks quality builders

Compound grants program has already accepted 12 proposals, amounting to a total committed amount of $200k to builders. All of the funding is happening transparently and can be tracked on Questbook

However, we need to attract the best builders to continue to make CGP an ongoing success. Particularly,

  • Increase awareness among top builders that Compound grants are back.
  • Increase inflow of builders for proposals in security, multichain-cross chain, and Dev tooling domains

The invite for builders can more formally be seen here in the form of well-defined RFPs :

Impact

Uniswap and Aave regularly sponsor events. Their presence in hackathons inspires builders to build on top of their solutions.

Compound has previously sponsored hackathons too. Speaking to the team, we learned that the impact of Compound sponsoring the hackathon was limited to brand recall.

However, CGP aims to sponsor ETHGlobal events with the specific goal of getting more builders to build the RFPs laid out by the 4 domains.

Case studies from CGP 2.0

What we get

  • Partner Table - to explain the RFPs and help builders lay out a development roadmap
  • Workshops (Recorded and in-person) - increase awareness of RFPs by building MVPs of desired projects
  • Connected to the builders - Dedicated channel in the online ETHGlobal community and connect with teams building on the compound.

We should use sponsorships with a laser focus on inviting builders to the already listed RFPs. We know what we want, we know who can build them, and we know where to find them. We will pick winners only if they’re building something in response to the RFPs listed.

What exactly will we be paying for?

  • ETHGlobal’s sponsorship fees for participation as a protocol in the three aforementioned events.
  • Community member passes for protocol community representatives (ranging from $500 - $1,000 per person, per event). The number of community members that can represent varies from event to event. We decide this by self-nomination and polling on the forum posts for each event.
  • Compound Grants hackathon sponsor bounty prizes ($5,000 - $10,000 per event).
  • This specific grant will NOT include stipends for travel and lodging fees for participants in the in-person events.

Can I participate in a capacity beyond simply voting for this proposal?

Yes! We encourage community members to participate in the events. You may participate as a volunteer mentor, a judge, a hacker, or a presenter.

Adam from Compound Labs will participate as a mentor, developer workshop presenter, and judge for the Compound Grants bounty prizes in each event.

Community members may organize a presentation for the events that are based on the Compound protocol or Grants and must drive audience participation in the protocol community or Grants.

03Mismatch analysis

AIMismatch analysis by Kvorumclaude-sonnet-5
Consistent

The proposal describes a single action: transferring 1962.70 COMP to address 0x8524B12CB7710C75B53bAa9ca72B420542d24C13 to fund hackathon sponsorships. The decoded calldata shows exactly one action: a transfer(address,uint256) call on the COMP token contract sending 1962700000000000000000 wei (which equals 1962.7 COMP given 18 decimals) to the same address. The recipient address matches exactly, and the amount matches exactly after unit conversion. There are no additional actions, no omitted transfers, and no target or value mismatches. The single calldata action fully and accurately reflects the described action with no ambiguity.

Generated by Kvorum
model: claude-sonnet-5
provider: anthropic
profile: anthropic-strong-v1
prompt: v1.0
generated: 2mo ago
Review the decoded actions ↗

04Actions

1 total
#0transfer(address,uint256)chain 0x1
Target
0xc00e…6888
Value
0 wei
Function
transfer(address,uint256)
Arguments
{
  "0": "0x8524B12CB7710C75B53bAa9ca72B420542d24C13",
  "1": "1962700000000000000000"
}
Calldata

05Tally

Summed from votes

Voters61
VP participating947.7K
Outcome (current)For
Current support100%

06Voters

61 total

No votes recorded yet.

07Forum

AIForum synthesis by Kvorumclaude-sonnet-5
sentiment · favorablethread · constructive

Arguments for

  • Sponsoring ETHGlobal hackathons will raise awareness of CGP and its specific RFPs (dev tooling, security, multichain) to attract quality builders in a targeted way, unlike past sponsorships that only generated vague brand recall.— adam, madhavanmalolan
  • As domain allocators, we see this as a way to build pipelines of applicants and interested parties who can build on Compound within our respective domains.— Bobbay_StableNode, cylon, madhavanmalolan
  • Competing protocols like Uniswap and Aave regularly sponsor hackathons, and Compound risks falling behind in attracting developer talent if it does not do the same.— adam, cylon
  • The proposal is well-timed given CGP 2.0's momentum and Compound's multichain growth phase, and complements existing smaller education-oriented grant proposals.— allthecolors
  • Case studies from past CGP grants (e.g., Wido, Gabriel's wrapper) show hackathon-originated projects can lead to real, usable contributions to Compound.— adam

Arguments against

None surfaced.

Unresolved concerns

  • COMP tokens designated for grants were held in an EOA rather than a multisig, raising custody/security concerns before being moved back to the Grants SAFE.— arr00
  • Swapping ~$100k worth of COMP to USDC faced major slippage and price volatility (COMP price dropping from $50 to $43), plus complications from the SVB/Circle USDC depeg event, resulting in only $87,128 USDC being raised instead of the full $100k.— harsha
  • It was left unresolved/uncertain what specific changes to sponsorship features would occur given the shortfall in raised USDC compared to the original $100k target.— harsha

Notable participants

  • adamCo-author of the proposal who laid out the rationale, budget breakdown, and impact case for hackathon sponsorships.
  • harshaCo-author who provided ongoing execution updates on voting status, fund swaps, and complications with the COMP-to-USDC conversion.
  • madhavanmalolanDev Tooling domain allocator who voiced early support and helped coordinate the token swap execution.
  • Bobbay_StableNodeMultichain/Crosschain domain allocator who supported the proposal as a way to attract contributors.
  • cylonSecurity Tooling domain allocator who supported the proposal, citing competitive pressure from other protocols.
  • allthecolorsCommunity member who endorsed the timing of the proposal and helped coordinate the token swap execution.
  • arr00Raised a governance/security concern about COMP funds sitting in an EOA instead of a multisig.
  • robinnagpalGrant recipient who shared a related educational initiative (Compound Academy) as complementary context.
Generated by Kvorum
model: claude-sonnet-5
provider: anthropic
profile: anthropic-strong-v1
prompt: v1.0
generated: 2mo ago
Open the thread ↗