Add ENS to Aave V2
01Summary
Proposal to onboard ENS token as a collateral asset on Aave protocol. Initializes ENS reserve with specific parameters (50% LTV, 60% liquidation threshold, 8% liquidation bonus, 20% reserve factor), enables variable and stable borrowing, and connects a price oracle. All components have been tested and reviewed.
- Type
- protocol addition
Key changes
- ENS token added as collateral asset to Aave with 50% LTV and 60% liquidation threshold(high)
- Variable and stable borrowing enabled for ENS reserve(high)
- 20% reserve factor configured for ENS(medium)
- Price oracle (EnsUsdToEnsEth) connected to AaveOracle(high)
- 8% liquidation bonus set for ENS collateral(medium)
Generated by Kvorum
02Description
Simple Summary
ENS (Ethereum Name Service) is an critical piece of infrastructure for the Ethereum ecosystem with over 400,000 names registered and hundreds of intergrations across the ecosystem.
$ENS is the governance token providing ownership over the ENS protocol. $ENS governs the direction of the ENS treasury as well as controlling crucial protocol parameters via the ENS registrar controller.
This proposal looks to onboard $ENS as a collateral asset to Aave.
Motivation
Following conversations with Aave and ENS communities, we’ve found that ENS is a prime candidate for Aave, already having gathered over $1B in circulating market cap and millions of dollars in liquidity across the ecosystem.
The addition of ENS to Aave will unlock additional liquidity and optionality for all ENS holders.
Specification
This proposal initialises the ENS reserve, enables variable borrowing, sets a reserve factor and configures the reserve as collateral. As needed, it also connects a price source on the AaveOracle.
Test Cases
All the components involved in this proposal (tokens' implementations, interest rate strategy, oracle feed, proposal payload) have been tested and reviewed, including simulations on mainnet of the whole proposal lifecycle.
Implementation
- ProposalPayload
- aENS implementation
- Variable Debt ENS implementation
- Stable Debt ENS implementation
- Interest rate strategy
- EnsUsdToEnsEth price feed
- LTV: 50%
- Liquidation threshold: 60%
- Liquidation bonus: 8%
- Reserve Factor: 20%
Copyright
Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.
03Mismatch analysis
The proposal uses the standard Aave governance pattern: a single top-level call to a pre-deployed, audited ProposalPayload contract's execute() function, which internally performs all the reserve listing steps (enabling borrowing, setting LTV/threshold/bonus/reserve factor, wiring the oracle). The decoded calldata only shows this one opaque execute() call with no arguments, so the specific numeric parameters (50% LTV, 60% liquidation threshold, 8% bonus, 20% reserve factor) claimed in the description cannot be independently verified from the calldata alone. However, the target address of the execute() call exactly matches the ProposalPayload address linked in the description, which is a strong positive signal of consistency. This is the expected and routine pattern for Aave asset-listing proposals, so I am not flagging omissions or mismatches, but confidence is necessarily low because the actual parameter-setting logic lives in contract bytecode not exposed by the decoded arguments. No red flags such as target mismatches, suspicious recipients, or extra unexplained actions are present in what is visible.地方
Generated by Kvorum
04Actions
- Target
- 0xf42d…81d3
- Value
- 0 wei
- Function
- fallback()
- Arguments
{}- Calldata
05Tally
Summed from votes
06Voters
| Voter | Choice | % of total | Rationale | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C10xc17c…64e1 | For | 103.3K | 26.09% | — | 5y ago |
| 990x990d…f1c2 | For | 100K | 25.24% | — | 5y ago |
| AF0xafda…3a6e | For | 93.4K | 23.59% | — | 5y ago |
| 510x511e…4709 | For | 58.5K | 14.78% | — | 5y ago |
| F30xf36f…d88b | For | 39.1K | 9.88% | — | 5y ago |
| F50xf569…271b | For | 1.2K | 0.31% | — | 5y ago |
| A00xa055…96db | For | 182.1 | 0.05% | — | 5y ago |
| 640x64b0…a58d | For | 100 | 0.03% | — | 5y ago |
| F10xf191…7914 | For | 49.6 | 0.01% | — | 5y ago |
| 9F0x9fed…6a23 | For | 27.1 | 0.01% | — | 5y ago |
| 1D0x1d82…0ef8 | For | 12.7 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
| 860x86c6…565a | For | 10.7 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
| C00xc015…25ac | For | 10 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
| 1D0x1db6…118e | For | 10 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
| A00xa0ef…2d56 | For | 8 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
| B60xb63a…12a0 | For | 1.5 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
| 8D0x8dbc…d217 | For | 1.1 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
| 730x7302…fa54 | For | 1 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
| 7A0x7a67…8c0e | For | 0.1 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
| 7B0x7b9a…f612 | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
| 3E0x3ecf…ee9a | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
| 9D0x9d83…0414 | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
07Forum
No forum thread is confidently linked to this proposal.