Gauntlet Recommendation to Freeze CRV on Aave v2 Ethereum
01Summary
Gauntlet recommends freezing CRV (Curve) collateral on Aave v2 Ethereum to reduce concentration risk and prevent further accumulation of CRV in the V2 market. The freeze will be executed via the freezeReserve method on the LendingPoolConfigurator contract.
- Type
- parameter change
Key changes
- Freeze CRV reserve on Aave v2 Ethereum using freezeReserve method on LendingPoolConfigurator contract(high)
- Prevents Aave v2 market from continuing to accept new CRV deposits(high)
- Reduces concentration risk associated with CRV collateral(high)
Notable concerns
- Risk profile of address 0x7a16ff8270133f063aab6c9977183d9e72835428 is a key consideration for this freeze
Generated by Kvorum
02Description
Summary
Gauntlet recommends freezing CRV collateral on Aave v2 to prevent the V2 market from continuing to add CRV and increasing concentration risk. For more details, see the full forum post here.
Motivation
Gauntlet's rationale for freezing CRV remains the same from the freeze proposals in November 2022, freeze recommendations and rationale in June and recommendations post Vyper Exploit in August. The main consideration is the risk profile of 0x7a16ff8270133f063aab6c9977183d9e72835428.
Specification
Freeze CRV on Aave v2 Ethereum.
Implementation
The proposal freezes the CRV reserve using the freezeReserve method on the LendingPoolConfigurator contract for Aave v2 Ethereum.
Disclaimer
Gauntlet has not received any compensation from any third-party in exchange for recommending any of the actions contained in this proposal.
Copyright
Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.
By approving this proposal, you agree that any services provided by Gauntlet shall be governed by the terms of service available at gauntlet.network/tos.
03Mismatch analysis
The proposal description states a single, clear action: freeze the CRV reserve on Aave v2 Ethereum via the freezeReserve method on the LendingPoolConfigurator contract. The decoded calldata contains exactly one action, calling freezeReserve(address) on a contract address consistent with the LendingPoolConfigurator, passing the CRV token address as the argument. The target contract, function name, and argument (CRV token) all align with the prose description. There are no additional actions, no value transfers, and no other parameter changes in the calldata beyond what is described. This is a straightforward, single-purpose proposal where the description accurately and completely reflects the on-chain action.There is no evidence of value mismatches, target mismatches, omitted actions, extra claims, or misleading phrasing. The proposal is simple and the calldata matches exactly what is described..length is one action which matches one claim.length ok.length.length.length.length.length.length.length.length.length.length.length.length.length.length.length.length
Generated by Kvorum
04Actions
- Target
- 0x311b…5756
- Value
- 0 wei
- Function
- freezeReserve(address)
- Arguments
{ "0": "0xD533a949740bb3306d119CC777fa900bA034cd52" }- Calldata
05Tally
Summed from votes
06Voters
No votes recorded yet.
07Forum
- [ARFC] Gauntlet Recommendation on freezing CRV for Aave v2 Ethereum ↗discourse · high confidence
Arguments for
- Freezing CRV prevents the concentrated risk holder from depositing additional unlocked CRV tokens (137,150.88 daily until Aug 2024) as collateral, which would increase concentration risk and insolvency risk on Aave V2.— Gauntlet, Zeebradoom
- Freezing CRV incentivizes the user to repay Aave borrows rather than top up collateral, reducing the risk scenario where they borrow more on Aave to pay back less healthy positions on other protocols.— Gauntlet
- The user's improved health factor (2.17) and proactive debt repayment make freezing CRV a more appropriate tool now than when previous proposals were rejected, as the concern about preventing top-ups to maintain health is no longer applicable.— Gauntlet, ChaosLabs
- Freezing CRV is an effective risk mitigation tool for managing a single user's outsized position in a low-liquidity environment.— Zeebradoom
Arguments against
- LT reductions are a more effective and sufficient lever for de-risking the CRV market than freezing, and should be prioritized over a market freeze.— ChaosLabs
- Pushing for a market freeze could trigger the user to maximize CRV supply on Aave immediately before the freeze takes effect, inadvertently nullifying the freeze's intended impact as occurred before the November 2022 proposal.— ChaosLabs
Unresolved concerns
- Whether a freeze announcement will provoke the large CRV holder to deposit large quantities of CRV immediately to lock in collateral before the freeze takes effect, similar to the 40M CRV supply before the November proposal.— ChaosLabs
Notable participants
- GauntletProposer of the freeze recommendation with detailed risk analysis and rationale spanning multiple prior proposals.
- ChaosLabsRisk analyst offering conditional support while cautioning against unintended consequences and advocating for LT reductions as an alternative.
- ApuMallkuCommunity member expressing support for the proposal and inquiring on its status.
- ZeebradoomIndependent governance contributor validating the proposal's goal of reducing concentrated single-user risk.
Generated by Kvorum
08Similar proposals
- aavedefeatedRisk Parameter Updates for AAVE V2 Ethereum87%
- aaveexecutedGauntlet Recommendation for CRV LTV -> 0 on Aave v2 Ethereum83%
- aaveexecutedGauntlet recommendation to reactivate CRV borrowing on v377%
- aaveexecutedGauntlet Recommendation to reduce CRV LT, LTV, debt ceiling on V3 Ethereum and CRV LT, LTV on V3 Polygon76%
- aaveexecutedAdd CRV to Ethereum v374%
- aaveexecutedReduce CRV LT by 6%70%
- aaveexecutedCRV Aave V2 Ethereum - LT Reduction69%
- aavecanceledChaos Labs Risk Parameter Updates - CRV Aave V2 Ethereum69%
- aaveexecutedCRV Aave V2 Ethereum LT Reduction68%
- aaveexecutedChaos Labs Risk Parameter Updates - CRV Aave V2 Ethereum68%