Gauntlet Recommendation to reduce CRV LT, LTV, debt ceiling on V3 Ethereum and CRV LT, LTV on V3 Polygon

The proposal description names two specific pre-deployed payload contracts — one for Ethereum (0x7aa759a57c6b039a93e93683facd14209ee9a3dd) and one for Polygon (0xc12ad8b3d242b1eddc1c8319d1d58608e67043ed) — that implement the described CRV LT/LTV/debt-ceiling reductions. The decoded calldata shows action 0 directly calling execute() on the Ethereum payload address, an exact match. Action 1 calls execute(address) on a separate Ethereum contract, passing the Polygon payload address as an argument; this is the standard Aave cross-chain governance pattern where an Ethereum-based executor relays execution to the target network's payload, and the passed address exactly matches the Polygon payload cited in the description. Both target addresses referenced in the description are present and correctly wired into the calldata, so there is no target mismatch. The actual numeric parameter changes (LT, LTV, debt ceiling values) are encoded inside the payload contracts' bytecode, not visible in this top-level calldata (both calls are parameterless execute() invocations), so I cannot independently verify the exact percentages from calldata alone — this limits confidence to medium rather than high. However, nothing in the decoded actions contradicts or extends beyond what the description claims, and no unexpected targets, transfers, or extra actions are present. Overall, the description and calldata are consistent within the limits of what can be observed from the decoded top-level calls.