Aave V3 LTV and E-Mode Update
01Summary
LlamaRisk proposes multiple LTV reductions to 0% for underutilized or illiquid collateral assets (PYUSD on Ethereum Core, AUSD on Avalanche, wstETH on Gnosis, WETH and WMNT on Mantle), introduction of a new WMNT Stablecoins E-Mode to restrict WMNT borrowing to stablecoins only, and restoration of wstETH borrow caps on Ethereum Core and Prime from 1 to 7,000 and 18,000 respectively.
- Type
- parameter change
Key changes
- Decrease PYUSD LTV on Ethereum Core from 75% to 0% due to low collateral demand and strategy to maintain collateral utility only for blue-chip stablecoins(medium)
- Decrease AUSD LTV on Avalanche from 69% to 0% due to limited collateral use with only $39.4K in debt against $200K supply(low)
- Decrease wstETH LTV on Gnosis from 75% to 0% outside E-Mode due to declining liquidity with only 154 wstETH (~$317K) available for swaps(medium)
- Decrease WETH LTV on Mantle from 80.5% to 0% to mitigate illiquidity risk with only 7.7 WETH ($14.6K) available and ~$11M stablecoin debt exposure(high)
- Decrease WMNT LTV on Mantle from 40% to 0% and introduce new WMNT Stablecoins E-Mode to restrict borrowing to stablecoins (USDT0, USDC, GHO) only(high)
- Increase wstETH borrow cap on Ethereum Core from 1 to 7,000 following resolution of oracle misconfiguration incident(high)
- Increase wstETH borrow cap on Ethereum Prime from 1 to 18,000 following resolution of oracle misconfiguration incident(high)
Notable concerns
- WETH on Mantle has significant illiquidity with shallow market depth and ~$11M stablecoin debt already exposed to illiquidity risk
- wstETH on Gnosis liquidity has declined to only ~$317K available for swaps while $12.3M in debt is borrowed against it
- WMNT E-Mode will restrict collateral usage to stablecoin borrowing with 40% max LTV and 45% liquidation threshold
Generated by Kvorum
02Description
Simple Summary
LlamaRisk recommends the following changes:
-
Decrease LTV for PYUSD on Ethereum Core from 75% to 0%.
-
Decrease LTV for AUSD on Avalanche from 69% to 0%.
-
Decrease LTV for wstETH on Gnosis from 75% to 0%.
-
Decrease LTV for WETH on Mantle from 80.5% to 0%.
-
Decrease LTV for WMNT on Mantle from 40% to 0%.
-
Introduce a new WMNT Stablecoins E-Mode.
-
Increase borrow cap for wstETH on Ethereum Core from 1 to 7,000.
-
Increase borrow cap for wstETH on Ethereum Prime from 1 to 18,000.
Motivation
As per Llamarisk:
PYUSD Ethereum Core
PYUSD can be used as collateral on the Ethereum Core market, where currently 17M PYUSD is being supplied. Assets worth $3.3M are currently being borrowed against it, with the majority consisting of USDe debt at $2.49M (73.8%), followed by USDC at $367K and cbBTC at $142K. Together, these three assets account for roughly 89% of total borrowings.
Given the low demand for PYUSD as collateral and the broader strategy to maintain collateral utility only for blue-chip stablecoins, we recommend disabling PYUSD’s collateralization.
Recommendation
We recommend decreasing PYUSD LTV on Ethereum Core from 75% to 0%.
AUSD Avalanche
AUSD on Avalanche has a total supply of ~$200K with collateral currently enabled. However, similar to PYUSD, it has seen very limited use as collateral, with just $39.4K in debt borrowed against it. The majority of this debt is DAI at 44%, followed by AUSD (self-loop) at 19.5%. Therefore, we also recommend disabling AUSD collateralization for similar reasons.
Recommendation
We recommend decreasing AUSD LTV on Avalanche from 69% to 0%.
wstETH Gnosis
wstETH liquidity on Gnosis has declined, with currently only 154 wstETH worth ~$317K available to be swapped against stables. Given the utility of wstETH, where a total of $12.3M in debt has been borrowed against wstETH collateral, the majority comprising EURe, we recommend decreasing the wstETH LTV to 0% outside E-Mode until liquidity conditions improve.
Recommendation
To address wstETH liquidity concerns on Gnosis, we recommend decreasing the wstETH LTV outside E-Mode from 75% to 0%.
WETH Mantle
Currently, only 7.7 WETH ($14.6K) is available for WETH-to-USDT0 swaps at a 5.5% price impact, reflecting relatively shallow market depth. At the same time, there is ~$11M stablecoin debt, meaning Aave is already significantly exposed to illiquidity risk stemming from stablecoin borrows against WETH collateral. With the removal of the debt ceiling in v3.7, there is a risk of further unchecked debt accumulation.
Recommendation
To mitigate this risk, we recommend reducing the LTV for WETH to 0%, effectively disabling its use as collateral. Should liquidity conditions on Mantle improve, a dedicated WETH-stablecoin E-Mode can be introduced in the future.
WMNT Mantle
Compared to WETH, WMNT liquidity on Mantle is significantly deeper, with up to 2M WMNT ($1.23M) swappable to USDT0 within a 10% price impact. The observed intended use case is stablecoin borrowing against WMNT collateral, as shown below.
Recommendation
To prevent the growth of non-stablecoin borrows, given the volatile nature of WMNT collateral, we recommend reducing WMNT LTV to 0% and setting up a new stablecoin E-Mode.
wstETH Ethereum
Following the oracle misconfiguration incident, the wstETH borrow caps on the Ethereum Core and Prime instances were temporarily reduced to 1 as a precautionary measure. Since the issue was resolved, these borrow caps have remained unchanged. We recommend restoring the wstETH borrow caps to operational levels.
Specification
LTV Update
| Instance | Asset | Current LTV | Recommended LTV |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethereum Core | PYUSD | 75% | 0% |
| Avalanche | AUSD | 69% | 0% |
| Gnosis | wstETH | 75% | 0% |
| Mantle | WETH | 80.5% | 0% |
| Mantle | WMNT | 40% | 0% |
WMNT Stablecoin E-Mode
| Parameter | Value | Value | Value | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | WMNT | USDT0 | USDC | GHO |
| Collateral | Yes | No | No | No |
| Borrowable | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Isolated | Yes | - | - | - |
| Max LTV | 40% | - | - | - |
| Liquidation Threshold | 45% | - | - | - |
| Liquidation Bonus | 10% | - | - | - |
wstETH Borrow Cap Restoration
| Instance | Asset | Current Borrow Cap | Recommended Borrow Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethereum Core | wstETH | 1 | 7,000 |
| Ethereum Prime | wstETH | 1 | 18,000 |
References
- Implementation: AaveV3Ethereum, AaveV3Avalanche, AaveV3Gnosis, AaveV3Mantle, AaveV3EthereumLido
- Tests: AaveV3Ethereum, AaveV3Avalanche, AaveV3Gnosis, AaveV3Mantle, AaveV3EthereumLido
- Discussion
Copyright
Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.
03Mismatch analysis
The proposal description is a detailed, well-structured Aave risk-parameter update (LTV reductions to 0% for five collateral assets, a new WMNT stablecoin E-Mode, and wstETH borrow cap restorations on Ethereum Core/Prime). However, the decoded on-chain actions only show two generic execute() (fallback) calls to payload contracts on Ethereum mainnet, with no decoded arguments. This is consistent with Aave's standard governance pattern where a Payload contract encapsulates the actual parameter-setting logic (and often triggers cross-chain execution via CrossChainController for Avalanche, Gnosis, and Mantle changes), but because the calldata here provides no visibility into the specific function calls, target reserves, or numeric parameters being set, it is not possible to verify that the payload's internal logic matches the specific LTV values, E-Mode parameters, or borrow caps claimed in the description. There is no evidence of a mismatch — the actions target plausible payload addresses on the correct chain for an Aave governance proposal — but the lack of decoded detail means this check cannot substantively confirm correctness beyond structural plausibility. I therefore rate this consistent with the available evidence, but confidence is low due to the opacity of the decoded calldata rather than any identified problem with the proposal itself.
Generated by Kvorum
04Actions
- Target
- 0x1aa3…d3e9
- Value
- 0 wei
- Function
- fallback()
- Arguments
{}- Calldata
- Target
- 0xf660…6692
- Value
- 0 wei
- Function
- fallback()
- Arguments
{}- Calldata
05Tally
Summed from votes
06Voters
| Voter | Choice | % of total | Rationale | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 330x3320…3bb7 | For | 107.2K | 28.93% | — | 4mo ago |
| 2C0x2cc1…4df1 | For | 88.1K | 23.77% | — | 4mo ago |
| 8B0x8b37…2a22 | For | 75.9K | 20.48% | — | 4mo ago |
| B90xb933…8dd1 | For | 53.8K | 14.51% | — | 4mo ago |
| 360x3676…574d | For | 25K | 6.74% | — | 4mo ago |
| C00xc0d6…b802 | For | 20.2K | 5.44% | — | 4mo ago |
| 7F0x7fd5…caaf | For | 164.9 | 0.04% | — | 4mo ago |
| 080x0865…24ce | For | 151.2 | 0.04% | — | 4mo ago |
| 3D0x3ddc…05b0 | For | 102.4 | 0.03% | — | 4mo ago |
| 880x88c4…2fdd | For | 25.6 | 0.01% | — | 4mo ago |
| 720x7204…6f00 | For | 15.5 | 0.00% | — | 4mo ago |
| BC0xbcf0…46a5 | Against | 7.2 | 0.00% | — | 4mo ago |
| 080x089a…2dfd | For | 5 | 0.00% | — | 4mo ago |
| 9F0x9f62…2b48 | For | 1.7 | 0.00% | — | 4mo ago |
| 2F0x2f2f…f78a | For | 0.2 | 0.00% | — | 4mo ago |
| 530x53da…c14b | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 4mo ago |
07Forum
- [Direct-to-AIP] Aave V3 LTV and E-Mode Update ↗discourse · high confidence
Arguments for
- PYUSD has minimal collateral utility with only $3.3M borrowed against 17M supplied, and disabling it aligns with the strategy of maintaining collateralization only for blue-chip stablecoins.— LlamaRisk
- AUSD on Avalanche shows very limited use as collateral with just $39.4K in debt against $200K supply, making disablement a logical risk management step.— LlamaRisk
- wstETH liquidity on Gnosis has declined significantly to only $317K available for swaps, creating illiquidity risk despite $12.3M in debt borrowed against it.— LlamaRisk
- WETH on Mantle has dangerously shallow liquidity with only $14.6K available for swaps while $11M in stablecoin debt is outstanding, posing unchecked debt accumulation risk after debt ceiling removal.— LlamaRisk
- WMNT should have LTV set to 0% and a dedicated stablecoin E-Mode created to prevent volatile non-stablecoin borrowing while enabling the intended stablecoin use case.— LlamaRisk
- Restoring wstETH borrow caps on Ethereum Core and Prime to 7,000 and 18,000 respectively is justified now that the oracle misconfiguration incident has been resolved.— LlamaRisk
Arguments against
None surfaced.
Notable participants
- LlamaRiskProposal author and risk analyst providing comprehensive risk assessment and recommendations across six collateral and borrow cap adjustments.
Generated by Kvorum
08Similar proposals
- aaveexecutedGeneralized LT/LTV Reduction on Aave83%
- aaveexecutedConfiguration maintenance83%
- aaveexecutedChaos Labs Risk Parameter Updates - LTV and LT Alignment83%
- aaveexecutedAave V2 Deprecation Update82%
- aaveexecutedGeneralized LT/LTV Reductions on Aave V3 Step 282%
- aaveexecutedStablecoinIRUpdates82%
- aaveexecutedstablecoin harmonization81%
- aaveexecutedRisk Parameters for DAI Update81%
- aaveexecutedAave v2 Deprecation - Update81%
- aaveexecutedUpdate ETH EMode and WETH Risk Params on Aave v3 Ethereum, Optimism and Arbitrum81%