KVORUM
aaveSource: Aave governance v3 · #506

Aave V3 LTV and E-Mode Update

executedJul 21, 2026, 04:08 PM UTCby660x66a2…73ff

01Summary

AISummary by Kvorumclaude-haiku-4-5

LlamaRisk proposes multiple LTV reductions to 0% for underutilized or illiquid collateral assets (PYUSD on Ethereum Core, AUSD on Avalanche, wstETH on Gnosis, WETH and WMNT on Mantle), introduction of a new WMNT Stablecoins E-Mode to restrict WMNT borrowing to stablecoins only, and restoration of wstETH borrow caps on Ethereum Core and Prime from 1 to 7,000 and 18,000 respectively.

Type
parameter change

Key changes

  • Decrease PYUSD LTV on Ethereum Core from 75% to 0% due to low collateral demand and strategy to maintain collateral utility only for blue-chip stablecoins(medium)
  • Decrease AUSD LTV on Avalanche from 69% to 0% due to limited collateral use with only $39.4K in debt against $200K supply(low)
  • Decrease wstETH LTV on Gnosis from 75% to 0% outside E-Mode due to declining liquidity with only 154 wstETH (~$317K) available for swaps(medium)
  • Decrease WETH LTV on Mantle from 80.5% to 0% to mitigate illiquidity risk with only 7.7 WETH ($14.6K) available and ~$11M stablecoin debt exposure(high)
  • Decrease WMNT LTV on Mantle from 40% to 0% and introduce new WMNT Stablecoins E-Mode to restrict borrowing to stablecoins (USDT0, USDC, GHO) only(high)
  • Increase wstETH borrow cap on Ethereum Core from 1 to 7,000 following resolution of oracle misconfiguration incident(high)
  • Increase wstETH borrow cap on Ethereum Prime from 1 to 18,000 following resolution of oracle misconfiguration incident(high)

Notable concerns

  • WETH on Mantle has significant illiquidity with shallow market depth and ~$11M stablecoin debt already exposed to illiquidity risk
  • wstETH on Gnosis liquidity has declined to only ~$317K available for swaps while $12.3M in debt is borrowed against it
  • WMNT E-Mode will restrict collateral usage to stablecoin borrowing with 40% max LTV and 45% liquidation threshold
ContractsAaveV3EthereumAaveV3AvalancheAaveV3GnosisAaveV3MantleAaveV3EthereumLido
Generated by Kvorum
model: claude-haiku-4-5
provider: anthropic
profile: anthropic-fast-v1
prompt: v1.0
generated: 2mo ago
Read the description ↗

02Description

829 words

Simple Summary

LlamaRisk recommends the following changes:

  • Decrease LTV for PYUSD on Ethereum Core from 75% to 0%.

  • Decrease LTV for AUSD on Avalanche from 69% to 0%.

  • Decrease LTV for wstETH on Gnosis from 75% to 0%.

  • Decrease LTV for WETH on Mantle from 80.5% to 0%.

  • Decrease LTV for WMNT on Mantle from 40% to 0%.

  • Introduce a new WMNT Stablecoins E-Mode.

  • Increase borrow cap for wstETH on Ethereum Core from 1 to 7,000.

  • Increase borrow cap for wstETH on Ethereum Prime from 1 to 18,000.

Motivation

As per Llamarisk:

PYUSD Ethereum Core

PYUSD can be used as collateral on the Ethereum Core market, where currently 17M PYUSD is being supplied. Assets worth $3.3M are currently being borrowed against it, with the majority consisting of USDe debt at $2.49M (73.8%), followed by USDC at $367K and cbBTC at $142K. Together, these three assets account for roughly 89% of total borrowings.

Given the low demand for PYUSD as collateral and the broader strategy to maintain collateral utility only for blue-chip stablecoins, we recommend disabling PYUSD’s collateralization.

Recommendation

We recommend decreasing PYUSD LTV on Ethereum Core from 75% to 0%.

AUSD Avalanche

AUSD on Avalanche has a total supply of ~$200K with collateral currently enabled. However, similar to PYUSD, it has seen very limited use as collateral, with just $39.4K in debt borrowed against it. The majority of this debt is DAI at 44%, followed by AUSD (self-loop) at 19.5%. Therefore, we also recommend disabling AUSD collateralization for similar reasons.

Recommendation

We recommend decreasing AUSD LTV on Avalanche from 69% to 0%.

wstETH Gnosis

wstETH liquidity on Gnosis has declined, with currently only 154 wstETH worth ~$317K available to be swapped against stables. Given the utility of wstETH, where a total of $12.3M in debt has been borrowed against wstETH collateral, the majority comprising EURe, we recommend decreasing the wstETH LTV to 0% outside E-Mode until liquidity conditions improve.

Recommendation

To address wstETH liquidity concerns on Gnosis, we recommend decreasing the wstETH LTV outside E-Mode from 75% to 0%.

WETH Mantle

Currently, only 7.7 WETH ($14.6K) is available for WETH-to-USDT0 swaps at a 5.5% price impact, reflecting relatively shallow market depth. At the same time, there is ~$11M stablecoin debt, meaning Aave is already significantly exposed to illiquidity risk stemming from stablecoin borrows against WETH collateral. With the removal of the debt ceiling in v3.7, there is a risk of further unchecked debt accumulation.

Recommendation

To mitigate this risk, we recommend reducing the LTV for WETH to 0%, effectively disabling its use as collateral. Should liquidity conditions on Mantle improve, a dedicated WETH-stablecoin E-Mode can be introduced in the future.

WMNT Mantle

Compared to WETH, WMNT liquidity on Mantle is significantly deeper, with up to 2M WMNT ($1.23M) swappable to USDT0 within a 10% price impact. The observed intended use case is stablecoin borrowing against WMNT collateral, as shown below.

Recommendation

To prevent the growth of non-stablecoin borrows, given the volatile nature of WMNT collateral, we recommend reducing WMNT LTV to 0% and setting up a new stablecoin E-Mode.

wstETH Ethereum

Following the oracle misconfiguration incident, the wstETH borrow caps on the Ethereum Core and Prime instances were temporarily reduced to 1 as a precautionary measure. Since the issue was resolved, these borrow caps have remained unchanged. We recommend restoring the wstETH borrow caps to operational levels.

Specification

LTV Update

InstanceAssetCurrent LTVRecommended LTV
Ethereum CorePYUSD75%0%
AvalancheAUSD69%0%
GnosiswstETH75%0%
MantleWETH80.5%0%
MantleWMNT40%0%

WMNT Stablecoin E-Mode

ParameterValueValueValueValue
AssetWMNTUSDT0USDCGHO
CollateralYesNoNoNo
BorrowableNoYesYesYes
IsolatedYes---
Max LTV40%---
Liquidation Threshold45%---
Liquidation Bonus10%---

wstETH Borrow Cap Restoration

InstanceAssetCurrent Borrow CapRecommended Borrow Cap
Ethereum CorewstETH17,000
Ethereum PrimewstETH118,000

References

Copyright

Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.

03Mismatch analysis

AIMismatch analysis by Kvorumlow confidenceclaude-sonnet-5
Consistent

The proposal description is a detailed, well-structured Aave risk-parameter update (LTV reductions to 0% for five collateral assets, a new WMNT stablecoin E-Mode, and wstETH borrow cap restorations on Ethereum Core/Prime). However, the decoded on-chain actions only show two generic execute() (fallback) calls to payload contracts on Ethereum mainnet, with no decoded arguments. This is consistent with Aave's standard governance pattern where a Payload contract encapsulates the actual parameter-setting logic (and often triggers cross-chain execution via CrossChainController for Avalanche, Gnosis, and Mantle changes), but because the calldata here provides no visibility into the specific function calls, target reserves, or numeric parameters being set, it is not possible to verify that the payload's internal logic matches the specific LTV values, E-Mode parameters, or borrow caps claimed in the description. There is no evidence of a mismatch — the actions target plausible payload addresses on the correct chain for an Aave governance proposal — but the lack of decoded detail means this check cannot substantively confirm correctness beyond structural plausibility. I therefore rate this consistent with the available evidence, but confidence is low due to the opacity of the decoded calldata rather than any identified problem with the proposal itself.

Generated by Kvorum
model: claude-sonnet-5
provider: anthropic
profile: anthropic-strong-v1
prompt: v1.0
generated: 2mo ago
Review the decoded actions ↗

04Actions

2 total
#0fallback()chain 0x1
Target
0x1aa3…d3e9
Value
0 wei
Function
fallback()
Arguments
{}
Calldata
#1fallback()chain 0x1
Target
0xf660…6692
Value
0 wei
Function
fallback()
Arguments
{}
Calldata

05Tally

Summed from votes

Voters16
VP participating370.8K
Outcome (current)For
Current support100%

06Voters

16 total
Filter:
VoterChoice% of totalRationale
330x3320…3bb7For107.2K28.93%—4mo ago
2C0x2cc1…4df1For88.1K23.77%—4mo ago
8B0x8b37…2a22For75.9K20.48%—4mo ago
B90xb933…8dd1For53.8K14.51%—4mo ago
360x3676…574dFor25K6.74%—4mo ago
C00xc0d6…b802For20.2K5.44%—4mo ago
7F0x7fd5…caafFor164.90.04%—4mo ago
080x0865…24ceFor151.20.04%—4mo ago
3D0x3ddc…05b0For102.40.03%—4mo ago
880x88c4…2fddFor25.60.01%—4mo ago
720x7204…6f00For15.50.00%—4mo ago
BC0xbcf0…46a5Against7.20.00%—4mo ago
080x089a…2dfdFor50.00%—4mo ago
9F0x9f62…2b48For1.70.00%—4mo ago
2F0x2f2f…f78aFor0.20.00%—4mo ago
530x53da…c14bFor00.00%—4mo ago
Showing 16

07Forum

AIForum synthesis by Kvorumclaude-haiku-4-5
sentiment · favorablethread · constructive

Arguments for

  • PYUSD has minimal collateral utility with only $3.3M borrowed against 17M supplied, and disabling it aligns with the strategy of maintaining collateralization only for blue-chip stablecoins.— LlamaRisk
  • AUSD on Avalanche shows very limited use as collateral with just $39.4K in debt against $200K supply, making disablement a logical risk management step.— LlamaRisk
  • wstETH liquidity on Gnosis has declined significantly to only $317K available for swaps, creating illiquidity risk despite $12.3M in debt borrowed against it.— LlamaRisk
  • WETH on Mantle has dangerously shallow liquidity with only $14.6K available for swaps while $11M in stablecoin debt is outstanding, posing unchecked debt accumulation risk after debt ceiling removal.— LlamaRisk
  • WMNT should have LTV set to 0% and a dedicated stablecoin E-Mode created to prevent volatile non-stablecoin borrowing while enabling the intended stablecoin use case.— LlamaRisk
  • Restoring wstETH borrow caps on Ethereum Core and Prime to 7,000 and 18,000 respectively is justified now that the oracle misconfiguration incident has been resolved.— LlamaRisk

Arguments against

None surfaced.

Notable participants

  • LlamaRiskProposal author and risk analyst providing comprehensive risk assessment and recommendations across six collateral and borrow cap adjustments.
Generated by Kvorum
model: claude-haiku-4-5
provider: anthropic
profile: anthropic-fast-v1
prompt: v1.0
generated: 2mo ago
Open the thread ↗