lidoSource: Snapshot · #Qmd5qHe17QxmUUGhV755B1upS6i7gWkRs1f5TvqzDdj9Xf
Proposed Spend on Contributed 'LeXpunK Builder Defense DAO' Funds
01Summary
AISummary by Kvorum
An AI summary is not generated yet. Read the description →
02Description
412 words
The following is a vote on the proposed allocation of LeXpunK Builder Defense DAO funds as outlined in the following proposal.
Proposed Spend on Contributed Funds - Tranche 1 (start of Q4 2021 - end of Q1-2022)
- Operations | $150k (fund coordinator pay ($3k per project) & misc. expenses)
- DAO Structure & Risk Mitigation Bounties:
- Build DAO Coop / Labor Union Model | $15k min, up to $150k
- Model Foundation / DAO back-to-back docs / structure | $15k min, up to $100k
- Limited liability for DAOs, forking California nonprofit unincorporated association statute | $20k min, up to $100k
- DAO tax safe harbor (cross-category) - proposal to establish a safe harbor for smart contract systems that if they pay a ‘greater of’ %-based or flat tax, they will fit into safe harbor for certain tax-related risks
- Guidance paper regarding DAO legal claim standing, attorney client privilege issues, and proposed model structures and parameters for proper DAO legal defense funding | $25k min, up to $60k
Model Legislation/Regulation Bounties
- Section 409A amendment to improve tax treatment of vesting token awards + fork of yearn vesting contract that complements the amendment proposal | $25k min, up to $50k (legal) ; $50k flat (smart contract)
- Fork of Hester Peirce Safe Harbor (address lack of smart contract coverage & other issues) | $20k min, up to $100k
- Amendments to Beyer Crypto Bill (carve-out algo stablecoins, improve desecuritization process, better - clarity on not covering DeFi) | $10k min, up to $50k
- DAO tax safe harbor (cross-category) - proposal to establish a safe harbor for smart contract systems (i.e., if pay a “greater of” %-based or flat tax, a safe harbor for certain tax-related risks will apply).
Policy/Legal Position Paper Bounties
- Position paper on why DeFi smart contract transactions do not meet definitions of ‘swap’ | $50k min, up to $200k
- Why Worker-Driven DeFi communities are different from VC-backed communities and legal ramifications | $10k
- DeFi Functional Overview (functional overview, review against risk frameworks, discuss implications/application of CEA) | $50k
- Position paper on the MiCA Commission’s proposal, its potential application to DeFi protocols and basis for why its application should be limited in scope and recommendations / modifications of the existent rules to cover risks posed | $30k min, up to $40k
- Workable AML/KYC Compliance Model - compliance for regulated entities at fiat on and off-ramps | $15k
03Mismatch analysis
AIMismatch analysis by Kvorum
A calldata-vs-description analysis is not generated yet. Review the decoded actions →
04Actions
0 total
This proposal carries no on-chain actions.
05Tally
Summed from votes
For100.0%0
Against0.0%0
Voters23
VP participating0
Outcome (current)For
Current support100%
06Voters
23 total
Filter:
| Voter | Choice | % of total | Rationale | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC0xcc18…2575 | For | 0 | 39.41% | — | 5y ago |
| 450x4580…5f81 | For | 0 | 39.39% | — | 5y ago |
| LIlido.banteg.eth0x55bc…f0fa | For | 0 | 9.85% | — | 5y ago |
| 480x48ac…9ca2 | For | 0 | 9.85% | — | 5y ago |
| 320x3225…bbef | For | 0 | 0.98% | — | 5y ago |
| 0B0x0b30…db52 | For | 0 | 0.23% | — | 5y ago |
| C10xc164…7113 | For | 0 | 0.10% | — | 5y ago |
| 8D0x8d07…a265 | For | 0 | 0.09% | — | 5y ago |
| 3A0x3a40…9abc | For | 0 | 0.06% | — | 5y ago |
| 100x10f5…d2fe | For | 0 | 0.03% | — | 5y ago |
| 800x8025…6aaa | For | 0 | 0.01% | — | 5y ago |
| 100x10b0…1fb0 | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
| C50xc545…76dc | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
| B30xb3ad…8993 | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
| D50xd560…7201 | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
| 8E0x8e48…8fba | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
| 4B0x4b9c…d36a | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
| BA0xba27…f480 | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
| 630x63da…dfe1 | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
| 950x95b9…ceec | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
| 8C0x8c80…588e | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
| 4D0x4d64…cc7e | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
| 9A0x9a44…176d | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
Showing 23
07Forum
No forum thread is confidently linked to this proposal.
08Similar proposals
AI · embeddings
No semantically similar proposals found yet.