KVORUM
lidoSource: Snapshot · #0xfc6601914ffde67c2d865372e62ae16518ca9ebb323c9d7a6128c53321a00ff4

Yearly Budget & Apr 1, 2022 - June 30, 2022 Budget Request for DAO Hiring Committee

succeededApr 15, 2022, 10:00 AM UTCsignaling · non-bindingby320x3225…bbefView on Snapshot ↗

01Summary

AISummary by Kvorum

An AI summary is not generated yet. Read the description →

02Description

478 words

The Resourcing and Compensation Committee (RCC) was formed during the month of March after a successful vote for the RCC was completed by the Lido DAO via Snapshot. The RCC shall operationally consist of a multi-signature wallet with signers, thresholds, and future plans for the wallet outlined in the successful RCC budget proposal document found here.

The RCC shall exist to offer the DAO’s three official department heads for Business Development, Node Operator Management, and Marketing [to start] relief of blockers that have slowed down and in some ways prohibited them from executing upon their Objectives and Key Results (OKRs) for 2022. These departments shall make requests to multisignature signers and overseers to the RCC (which will expand and grow in due course).

The yearly budget request for the RCC is $5,368,568.84, comprised of both USD OpEx/compensation/marketing expense as well as LDO token grants. This equates to a $447,380.74 monthly expense to support the teams. A more detailed budget breakdown is found on the full proposal here.

This budget secures a team of 15 full-time employees as well as covers all operational costs listed below.

At the end of the calendar year, any budget not spent would either be rolled forward into the next budget period, or returned to the DAO treasury if no further budgets are approved. Should the RCC shut down, all unused funds will be returned to the DAO immediately.

The RCC will need $1,057,755.00 to fulfill its need within this 3-month budget period. Of this, $22,500 will be used to cover gas costs related to multisig signature transactions and currency swaps. We propose that the Lido DAO withdraws the equivalent of $1,057,755.00 in stETH held in the Lido DAO treasury to the RCC multisig wallet, and that the RCC multisig wallet sells this stETH for DAI to secure the RCC’s 3-month budget. For the remaining $22,500 required for gas reimbursements, the RCC shall instead swap this equivalent amount in stETH to ETH and store the ETH as-is as a gas reimbursement reserve.

We are asking the Lido DAO to transfer the equivalent of $1,057,755.00 (+5% premium to account for potential price fluctuation from the start of Aragon voting to the end) in stETH from the Lido DAO treasury to the RCC Multisig wallet address. The exact amount of stETH shall be determined when the Aragon vote is initiated.

RCC Multisig Details:

  • Address- 0xDE06d17Db9295Fa8c4082D4f73Ff81592A3aC437
  • Designated Contact: TG - @jbeezy1
  • Quorum - 3/5 to start, transition to a 4/7 threshold that will be completed by the RCC.

Proposed initial signers:

  • Jbeezy from Lido, Business Development Lead address: 0x039bDD285d3eDb1D9B6001d3097067Aa2AF7d826
  • Izzy from Lido, Master of Validators address: 0x783EA934d543CD1ccfd920639A7539a0BD3895e2
  • Kadmil from Lido, Technical manager for the DAO address: 0x9A3f38AF97b791C85c043D46a64f56f87E0283D4
  • Aurelius from Lido, Operational Manager Candidate address: 0x7A29c1197962D1b42FcfA8095fA1dF66E489fCd6
  • AD from Lido, Marketing Lead address: 0x0d22e69ce47818c3524Fe952e8De7AF78cC3C43b

Full proposal and address confirmation signatures: https://research.lido.fi/t/rcc-1-apr-1-2022-june-30-2022-budget-request/1980

03Mismatch analysis

AIMismatch analysis by Kvorum

A calldata-vs-description analysis is not generated yet. Review the decoded actions →

04Actions

0 total

This proposal carries no on-chain actions.

05Tally

Summed from votes

Voters47
VP participating0
Outcome (current)For
Current support100%

06Voters

47 total
Filter:
VoterChoice% of totalRationale
CC0xcc18…2575For020.90%—5y ago
450x4580…5f81For020.89%—5y ago
E00xe017…4e63For019.20%—5y ago
B80xb842…82b0For018.51%—5y ago
4A0x4a7c…c7ceFor04.96%—5y ago
960x9648…ea04For04.96%—5y ago
000x0087…8e8dFor04.32%—5y ago
LIlido.banteg.eth0x55bc…f0faFor03.92%—5y ago
100x10f5…d2feFor02.15%—5y ago
0B0x0b30…db52For00.12%—5y ago
8D0x8d07…a265For00.05%—5y ago
FD0xfde0…626cFor00.02%—5y ago
PIpizzallama.eth0x32a5…525dFor00.00%—5y ago
020x0281…353fFor00.00%—5y ago
D90xd929…b62cFor00.00%—5y ago
F10xf113…bdb9For00.00%—5y ago
FC0xfc79…76d3For00.00%—5y ago
6F0x6f03…7db9For00.00%—5y ago
470x471a…d6b7For00.00%—5y ago
7B0x7b79…2a2eFor00.00%—5y ago
950x95b9…ceecFor00.00%—5y ago
6C0x6cc1…9415For00.00%—5y ago
DA0xda94…4951For00.00%—5y ago
970x9796…4f33For00.00%—5y ago
D50xd595…8fc6For00.00%—5y ago
1F0x1f14…8f99For00.00%—5y ago
8F0x8fa3…8724For00.00%—5y ago
910x910c…3598For00.00%—5y ago
1B0x1b9d…61ddFor00.00%—5y ago
D00xd03a…a7ffFor00.00%—5y ago
A80xa8c4…9940For00.00%—5y ago
FD0xfdab…2b62For00.00%—5y ago
BB0xbb02…2f78For00.00%—5y ago
C80xc85f…6c10For00.00%—5y ago
C90xc973…9457For00.00%—5y ago
2C0x2c11…258cFor00.00%—5y ago
060x0641…eb69For00.00%—5y ago
C70xc7fc…968bFor00.00%—5y ago
D40xd4dc…bec0For00.00%—5y ago
870x87ab…bdcaFor00.00%—5y ago
B70xb789…f059For00.00%—5y ago
700x70dd…0086For00.00%—5y ago
F70xf747…059aFor00.00%—5y ago
490x491e…dfa4For00.00%—5y ago
960x9622…949eFor00.00%—5y ago
CD0xcd01…d4d7For00.00%—5y ago
A20xa2de…7864For00.00%—5y ago
Showing 47

07Forum

No forum thread is confidently linked to this proposal.

08Similar proposals

AI · embeddings

No semantically similar proposals found yet.