KVORUM
lidoSource: Snapshot · #0x93baeaa1b3e3ed31df27dc5dbbb729cc562d6766513b01ef59ec8f362d45edd5

Should Solstice continue in the Curated set following the acquisition of Bridgetower?

succeededJan 30, 2025, 04:00 PM UTCsignaling · non-bindingbyDB0xdbbc…1cb6View on Snapshot ↗

01Summary

AISummary by Kvorum

An AI summary is not generated yet. Read the description →

02Description

305 words

Background and Context

Node Operator Bridgetower was recently acquired by Solstice Staking AG, a Swiss public limited company and Deus X Capital Enterprise company. As announced on the forum, all of the existing Bridgetower validators and associated delegated staking operations would remain fully operational through the transition, managed by the same team, and operating on the same on-premise infrastructure in Switzerland. According to Bridgetower, concerning their data in the Curated Module operator registry, the registry address of their Operator (#17) is to remain unchanged. The only thing that changes is the Node Operator’s name to “Solstice” requiring on-chain vote. This Snapshot and the on-chain vote to change the name are independent of each other, the decision-making process for whether a Node Operator continues to participate in the Curated set has its own flow, while the on-chain renaming is intended to ensure that the on-chain name matches the actual name.

The Lido Node Operator Sub-Governance Group (LNOSG) has reviewed the provided information related to the transition and found no reason to propose ceasing the operator’s participation in Lido on Ethereum Curated set.

The LNOSG supports continuing collaboration with this operator, as the operator has confirmed on the forum that no changes are planned following the acquisition and has expressed their readiness to continue their work.

The detailed conclusion was published on the forum and may offer further help to voters in their consideration.

Proposal

Allow Solstice to continue Node Operations in Lido on Ethereum as-is.

Voting Outcomes

A vote "For" indicates agreement with this proposal. If "For" wins, Solstice will continue Node Operations in Lido on Ethereum as-is.

A vote "Against" indicates disagreement with this proposal. As the range of dispute options is extensive, a vote "Against" entails a discussion to identify which options should be considered and brought to a subsequent vote.

03Mismatch analysis

AIMismatch analysis by Kvorum

A calldata-vs-description analysis is not generated yet. Review the decoded actions →

04Actions

0 total

This proposal carries no on-chain actions.

05Tally

Summed from votes

Voters102
VP participating0
Outcome (current)For
Current support100%

06Voters

102 total
Filter:
VoterChoice% of totalRationale
4A0x4af8…6a0bFor024.97%—2y ago
810x8172…922eFor011.32%—2y ago
6D0x6d8d…0cccFor06.96%—2y ago
LIlido.banteg.eth0x55bc…f0faFor06.95%—2y ago
9C0x9ca8…36afFor06.07%—2y ago
510x510a…8d0eFor05.86%—2y ago
A40xa418…b737For04.97%—2y ago
3D0x3ddc…05b0For04.91%—2y ago
FF0xff41…a67bFor04.84%—2y ago
B90xb933…8dd1For04.74%—2y ago
BE0xbeb3…7646For04.01%—2y ago
110x1109…43daFor03.94%—2y ago
1F0x1f76…5ed6For02.42%—2y ago
6A0x6a39…4bd2For02.33%—2y ago
7A0x7a59…8e22For01.09%—2y ago
A20xa2ff…7be9For00.81%—2y ago
870x8787…ea52For00.63%—2y ago
2C0x2cc1…4df1For00.54%—2y ago
B60xb664…f890For00.54%—2y ago
6F0x6f9b…8a1dFor00.38%—2y ago
290x29b5…2c2fFor00.33%—2y ago
100x10a2…36f3For00.27%—2y ago
B30xb3ba…ebc5For00.27%—2y ago
620x624d…2cd0For00.25%—2y ago
980x9830…bd94For00.15%—2y ago
060x06a9…bba0For00.15%—2y ago
220x225d…093aFor00.10%—2y ago
780x78d1…753aFor00.08%—2y ago
5F0x5fdc…b69fFor00.04%—2y ago
490x49f1…6cdbFor00.03%—2y ago
3F0x3fb1…4c8aFor00.02%—2y ago
8A0x8ab6…e0baFor00.00%—2y ago
7A0x7af3…8df3For00.00%—2y ago
050x0579…4048For00.00%—2y ago
3D0x3d5a…b97fFor00.00%—2y ago
2F0x2f15…631fFor00.00%—2y ago
580x5820…a011For00.00%—2y ago
B70xb792…89d7For00.00%—2y ago
520x5243…3440Against00.00%—2y ago
EC0xecc2…6ac9For00.00%—2y ago
E60xe6b5…f1fdFor00.00%—2y ago
C10xc1c2…24f8For00.00%—2y ago
530x53c4…3584For00.00%—2y ago
C40xc48b…75b6For00.00%—2y ago
500x500f…7d0bFor00.00%—2y ago
050x0579…ca09For00.00%—2y ago
2D0x2d67…ac5cFor00.00%—2y ago
270x2748…ac26For00.00%—2y ago
650x659f…dadcFor00.00%—2y ago
140x14af…2531For00.00%—2y ago
Showing 50

07Forum

No forum thread is confidently linked to this proposal.

08Similar proposals

AI · embeddings

No semantically similar proposals found yet.