KVORUM
lidoSource: Snapshot · #0x89bf9f39d623ae2e6d1f876f345f59aaecb2cc4c6eec613e3385a5342dc08fa5

Should Alchemy continue in SDVT and LoP following the acquisition of Bware Labs?

succeededNov 28, 2024, 04:00 PM UTCsignaling · non-bindingby8E0x8ee5…fbc1View on Snapshot ↗

01Summary

AISummary by Kvorum

An AI summary is not generated yet. Read the description →

02Description

200 words

TL;DR

The Lido Node Operator Sub-Governance Group (LNOSG) has reviewed recent business changes affecting the Node Operator (NO) Bware Labs. This proposal outlines the LNOSG's thoughts and asks voters to consider the matter.

Background and Context

Bware Labs was recently acquired by Alchemy. The following proposal outlines the LNOSG’s thoughts after considering the information provided by Bware Labs in response to the LNOSG’s questions, which may offer further help to voters in their consideration.

Summary

The LNOSG has reviewed the provided information related to the transition and found no reason to propose ceasing the operator’s participation in Lido on Ethereum Simple DVT and Lido on Polygon. Bware Labs’ post-acquisition continuity is expected to be seamless.

Proposal

Allow Alchemy to continue Node Operations in Lido on Ethereum Simple DVT and Lido on Polygon as-is.

Voting Outcomes

A "For" indicates agreement with this proposal. If "For" wins, Alchemy continues Node Operations in Lido on Ethereum Simple DVT and Lido on Polygon as-is.

A vote "Against" indicates disagreement with this proposal. As the range of dispute options is extensive, a vote "Against" entails a discussion to identify which options should be considered and brought to a following vote.

03Mismatch analysis

AIMismatch analysis by Kvorum

A calldata-vs-description analysis is not generated yet. Review the decoded actions →

04Actions

0 total

This proposal carries no on-chain actions.

05Tally

Summed from votes

Voters80
VP participating0
Outcome (current)For
Current support100%

06Voters

80 total
Filter:
VoterChoice% of totalRationale
4A0x4af8…6a0bFor023.20%—2y ago
810x8172…922eFor011.35%—2y ago
7E0x7ee0…bb6cFor09.02%—2y ago
510x510a…8d0eFor07.06%—2y ago
6D0x6d8d…0cccFor06.63%—2y ago
LIlido.banteg.eth0x55bc…f0faFor06.48%—2y ago
A40xa418…b737For06.35%—2y ago
9C0x9ca8…36afFor05.65%—2y ago
3D0x3ddc…05b0For04.59%—2y ago
CE0xce3b…2e55For03.60%—2y ago
BE0xbeb3…7646For03.42%—2y ago
6A0x6a39…4bd2For02.57%—2y ago
1F0x1f76…5ed6For02.17%—2y ago
B90xb933…8dd1For01.72%—2y ago
7A0x7a59…8e22For01.44%—2y ago
A20xa2ff…7be9For01.19%—2y ago
870x8787…ea52For00.58%—2y ago
E80xe80e…28e8For00.57%—2y ago
2C0x2cc1…4df1For00.51%—2y ago
B60xb664…f890For00.50%—2y ago
6F0x6f9b…8a1dFor00.36%—2y ago
290x29b5…2c2fFor00.34%—2y ago
100x10a2…36f3For00.25%—2y ago
980x9830…bd94For00.14%—2y ago
060x06a9…bba0For00.14%—2y ago
780x78d1…753aFor00.09%—2y ago
490x49f1…6cdbFor00.03%—2y ago
3F0x3fb1…4c8aFor00.02%—2y ago
050x0579…4048For00.00%—2y ago
CE0xcedf…614bFor00.00%—2y ago
420x42e6…3fb0For00.00%—2y ago
7A0x7af3…8df3For00.00%—2y ago
4D0x4d26…7017For00.00%—2y ago
3D0x3d5a…b97fFor00.00%—2y ago
B00xb039…3d8bFor00.00%—2y ago
B70xb792…89d7For00.00%—2y ago
6A0x6afa…5deeFor00.00%—2y ago
ED0xed95…68a6For00.00%—2y ago
0F0x0fad…1d32For00.00%—2y ago
520x5243…3440Against00.00%—2y ago
EC0xecc2…6ac9For00.00%—2y ago
E60xe6b5…f1fdFor00.00%—2y ago
C10xc1c2…24f8For00.00%—2y ago
E70xe7c3…c64cFor00.00%—2y ago
780x78cf…a5dfFor00.00%—2y ago
D30xd31a…1072For00.00%—2y ago
8B0x8bc8…7276For00.00%—2y ago
C40xc48b…75b6For00.00%—2y ago
270x2748…ac26For00.00%—2y ago
D50xd5d7…3c4dFor00.00%—2y ago
Showing 50

07Forum

No forum thread is confidently linked to this proposal.

08Similar proposals

AI · embeddings

No semantically similar proposals found yet.