KVORUM
lidoSource: Snapshot · #0x7fd7879a945ebf95709bb0f5d0679370a06d6d0289b832ef8a100f983373e242

Should Pier Two continue in the Curated Module Set following the acquisition of Numic?

succeededNov 28, 2024, 04:00 PM UTCsignaling · non-bindingby8E0x8ee5…fbc1View on Snapshot ↗

01Summary

AISummary by Kvorum

An AI summary is not generated yet. Read the description →

02Description

372 words

TL;DR

The Lido Node Operator Sub-Governance Group (LNOSG) conducted a review after the acquisition of Numic by Pier Two, taking into account improved practices in light of the previous security incident. The LNOSG sees no reason to suggest that Pier Two not continue as a Node Operator (NO) in the Curated Module and SDVT. The LNOSG also suggests that Pier Two follow the usual onboarding process: testnet first, then, upon successful completion on the testnet trial-run, a slow ramp-up on mainnet. This proposal outlines the LNOSG's thoughts and asks voters to consider the matter.

Background and Context

The LNOSG has reviewed the relevant data and information provided by Pier Two. The review involves the acquisition of Numic and the previous security incident disclosed by Numic. The purpose of the evaluation was to understand to what extent possible material changes in node operations would result as a consequence of the acquisition. Currently, Pier Two has no depositable keys. The LNOSG’s thoughts and observations serve as a basis for the content of the vote.

Summary

The LNOSG spent some additional time and asked for more information as the proposed way forward by Pier Two involved using an infrastructure setup different from Numic’s previous setup.

Recommended Steps:

  1. Trial Run on Testnet: Pier Two will replicate its proposed mainnet setup on the testnet and follow an end-to-end NO flow, including registration, deposit, and keys exit, during which operational performance will be re-checked.
  2. Gradual Ramp-Up on Mainnet: Upon successfully completing the testnet trial run, Pier Two will commence a slow ramp-up on the mainnet. This staged approach is intended to closely monitor their performance and flag any potential issues during the initial mainnet period.

Proposal

Allow Pier Two to continue Node Operations following the suggested steps for testnet and mainnet ramp-up.

Voting Outcomes

A "For" indicates agreement with this proposal. If "For" wins, then Pier Two starts a trial run on testnet and then (upon successful completion) commences a slow ramp-up on mainnet.

A vote "Against" indicates disagreement with this proposal. As the range of options in dispute is extensive, a vote "Against" entails a discussion to identify which options should be considered and brought to a following vote.

03Mismatch analysis

AIMismatch analysis by Kvorum

A calldata-vs-description analysis is not generated yet. Review the decoded actions →

04Actions

0 total

This proposal carries no on-chain actions.

05Tally

Summed from votes

Voters77
VP participating0
Outcome (current)For
Current support100%

06Voters

77 total
Filter:
VoterChoice% of totalRationale
4A0x4af8…6a0bFor022.38%—2y ago
810x8172…922eFor010.95%—2y ago
7E0x7ee0…bb6cFor08.71%—2y ago
510x510a…8d0eFor06.81%—2y ago
6D0x6d8d…0cccFor06.39%—2y ago
LIlido.banteg.eth0x55bc…f0faFor06.25%—2y ago
A40xa418…b737For06.13%—2y ago
9C0x9ca8…36afFor05.45%—2y ago
3D0x3ddc…05b0For04.43%—2y ago
110x1109…43daFor03.54%—2y ago
CE0xce3b…2e55For03.47%—2y ago
BE0xbeb3…7646For03.30%—2y ago
6A0x6a39…4bd2For02.48%—2y ago
1F0x1f76…5ed6For02.10%—2y ago
B90xb933…8dd1For01.66%—2y ago
7A0x7a59…8e22For01.39%—2y ago
A20xa2ff…7be9For01.14%—2y ago
870x8787…ea52For00.56%—2y ago
E80xe80e…28e8For00.55%—2y ago
2C0x2cc1…4df1For00.49%—2y ago
B60xb664…f890For00.48%—2y ago
6F0x6f9b…8a1dFor00.35%—2y ago
290x29b5…2c2fFor00.32%—2y ago
100x10a2…36f3For00.24%—2y ago
980x9830…bd94For00.14%—2y ago
060x06a9…bba0For00.14%—2y ago
780x78d1…753aFor00.08%—2y ago
490x49f1…6cdbFor00.03%—2y ago
3F0x3fb1…4c8aFor00.02%—2y ago
050x0579…4048For00.00%—2y ago
CE0xcedf…614bFor00.00%—2y ago
420x42e6…3fb0For00.00%—2y ago
7A0x7af3…8df3For00.00%—2y ago
3D0x3d5a…b97fFor00.00%—2y ago
B00xb039…3d8bFor00.00%—2y ago
B70xb792…89d7For00.00%—2y ago
6A0x6afa…5deeFor00.00%—2y ago
ED0xed95…68a6For00.00%—2y ago
0F0x0fad…1d32For00.00%—2y ago
520x5243…3440Against00.00%—2y ago
EC0xecc2…6ac9For00.00%—2y ago
E60xe6b5…f1fdFor00.00%—2y ago
C10xc1c2…24f8For00.00%—2y ago
E70xe7c3…c64cFor00.00%—2y ago
780x78cf…a5dfFor00.00%—2y ago
D30xd31a…1072For00.00%—2y ago
8B0x8bc8…7276For00.00%—2y ago
C40xc48b…75b6For00.00%—2y ago
D50xd5d7…3c4dFor00.00%—2y ago
270x2748…ac26For00.00%—2y ago
Showing 50

07Forum

No forum thread is confidently linked to this proposal.

08Similar proposals

AI · embeddings

No semantically similar proposals found yet.