KVORUM
lidoSource: Snapshot · #0x7569e4487b7737fa8e98fe708843deb014a61d0dbfeeb6e57ad1f4dba5494598

Lido Alliance Grant Proposal

succeededDec 23, 2024, 04:00 PM UTCsignaling · non-bindingbyDB0xdbbc…1cb6View on Snapshot ↗

01Summary

AISummary by Kvorum

An AI summary is not generated yet. Read the description →

02Description

503 words

The [EGG] Lido Alliance Grant Funding proposal seeks to continue the activities of the Lido Alliance BORG through 2025, aligning with GOOSE-2

tldr

  • Continue Alliance BORG activities through 2025 in line with approved guidelines

Basic Data

FieldDescription
Proposal NameAlliance BORG 2025
Which of the following GOOSE goals is your proposal advancing?Lido Alliance BORG is a Cayman Foundation organized to endorse, amplify and stand behind builders driven by the same vision of decentralized validation, and a universally accessible, censorship-resistant Ethereum. Advancing mainly "Expand stETH’s Ecosystem with a Diverse Product Line" from GOOSE-2
Organization descriptionCayman Foundation founded after an affirmative DAO vote, currently serviced, following Borg approval, by Captain Nemo
Proposed scope of workScouting, research, due diligence calls, coordination with Lido contributor organizations and Alliance partners, initial discussion, application support
ObjectivesExpand Alliance to 8+ total members, Support growth and adoption of stETH within existing Alliance set
Total Budget Request300k DAI (or USDC, USDT hereinafter)
Best-before date31-Dec-2025

Substantiation for request

The Lido Alliance initiative launched last year and has already succeeded in enlisting projects that subscribe to Lido ecosystem valuesand support the growth of the Lido ecosystem. Current DAO-supported members include: Drop, Mellow, Bolt

Relative to the 125k DAI request approved for half a year, the BORG has incurred expenses of approximately 100k DAI so far, largely related to setup and administrative fees which are not expected to recur in 2025, and a further 25k DAI earmarked for incurred expenses related to third party engagements

  • The budget request is intended to cover:
    1. Operational overhead (Administrative expenses, director fees, software infrastructure)
    2. Growth initiatives and project discovery (Outreach and primary sourcing of high-potential projects, ongoing support to existing members)
    3. Evaluation and pipeline management (Due diligence screening, external security ratings and advisory)
  • Composition of request:
    1. 200k DAI - third-party service contracts for full-time contributor team, third-party due diligence support and other agencies
    2. 25k DAI - administrative expenses
    3. 75k DAI - operational overhead necessary for execution, including marketing engagements and communication
  • Slight increase of 50k DAI relative to original expectations behind higher than expected projected expenses for comprehensive security due diligence on prospective applicants

Goals

  • Plan to expand Alliance to 8+ total members by end of 2025 provided we can ensure:
    1. Compliance with the security checklist
    2. Expand stETH’s Ecosystem with a Diverse Product Line (explore collaborations with a broad range of DeFi applications)
    3. Establish an open market for validators (explore collaborations that can expand the range of opportunities for node operators that are part of Lido ecosystem)
  • Support the growth and adoption of stETH within the existing Alliance ecosystem

Reminder

LDO holders hold the right to make the final decision on each new potential member of the Alliance by participating in Snapshot vote.

03Mismatch analysis

AIMismatch analysis by Kvorum

A calldata-vs-description analysis is not generated yet. Review the decoded actions →

04Actions

0 total

This proposal carries no on-chain actions.

05Tally

Summed from votes

Voters115
VP participating0
Outcome (current)For
Current support100%

06Voters

115 total
Filter:
VoterChoice% of totalRationale
4A0x4af8…6a0bFor022.32%—2y ago
810x8172…922eFor010.56%—2y ago
7E0x7ee0…bb6cFor08.67%—2y ago
LIlido.banteg.eth0x55bc…f0faFor06.22%—2y ago
6D0x6d8d…0cccFor06.14%—2y ago
A40xa418…b737For06.10%—2y ago
510x510a…8d0eFor05.94%—2y ago
B90xb933…8dd1For04.63%—2y ago
3D0x3ddc…05b0For04.41%—2y ago
FF0xff41…a67bFor04.32%—2y ago
110x1109…43daFor03.53%—2y ago
CE0xce3b…2e55For03.46%—2y ago
BE0xbeb3…7646For03.29%—2y ago
6A0x6a39…4bd2For02.30%—2y ago
1F0x1f76…5ed6For01.94%—2y ago
7A0x7a59…8e22For01.20%—2y ago
A20xa2ff…7be9For01.08%—2y ago
B60xb664…f890For00.60%—2y ago
870x8787…ea52For00.56%—2y ago
E80xe80e…28e8For00.55%—2y ago
2C0x2cc1…4df1For00.49%—2y ago
6F0x6f9b…8a1dFor00.34%—2y ago
290x29b5…2c2fFor00.29%—2y ago
100x10a2…36f3For00.24%—2y ago
620x624d…2cd0For00.21%—2y ago
980x9830…bd94For00.14%—2y ago
060x06a9…bba0For00.14%—2y ago
3D0x3d63…4afcFor00.11%—2y ago
780x78d1…753aFor00.07%—2y ago
610x61cc…87d1For00.05%—2y ago
5F0x5fdc…b69fFor00.04%—2y ago
3F0x3fb1…4c8aFor00.02%—2y ago
500x50ed…e1b2For00.02%—2y ago
9E0x9e0b…da3aFor00.01%—2y ago
050x0579…4048For00.00%—2y ago
420x42e6…3fb0For00.00%—2y ago
8A0x8ab6…e0baFor00.00%—2y ago
7A0x7af3…8df3For00.00%—2y ago
4D0x4d26…7017For00.00%—2y ago
DB0xdbbc…1cb6For00.00%—2y ago
3D0x3d5a…b97fFor00.00%—2y ago
5E0x5e45…3248For00.00%—2y ago
6A0x6a2d…03e0For00.00%—2y ago
580x5820…a011For00.00%—2y ago
5A0x5a51…347cFor00.00%—2y ago
2F0x2f15…631fFor00.00%—2y ago
B70xb792…89d7For00.00%—2y ago
ED0xed95…68a6For00.00%—2y ago
520x5243…3440Against00.00%—2y ago
EC0xecc2…6ac9For00.00%—2y ago
Showing 50

07Forum

No forum thread is confidently linked to this proposal.

08Similar proposals

AI · embeddings

No semantically similar proposals found yet.