KVORUM
lidoSource: Snapshot · #0x62eb338c6d256d43ee54e2b79e9442b58fcfda4ecdcd817ff6422d564d153e9a

Proposal for Updating Lido on Ethereum Validator Exits SNOP to v3

succeededOct 22, 2025, 04:00 PM UTCsignaling · non-bindingbyFF0xff64…1fceView on Snapshot ↗

01Summary

AISummary by Kvorum

An AI summary is not generated yet. Read the description →

02Description

504 words

Summary

This proposal seeks the community’s support to update the currently in effect Standard Node Operator Protocol (SNOP) on Validator Exits v2 (Snapshot) to the proposed SNOP on Validator Exits v3.

Context & Motivation

The current version of the SNOP on Validator Exits dates back to when Ethereum’s withdrawal and exit mechanics were still largely static. Since then, several important developments have emerged:

  • The Staking Router architecture continues to evolve, enabling new modules such as SDVT and CSM.
  • The Pectra upgrade introduced Triggerable Withdrawals, expanding the flexibility of how withdrawals can be executed by protocols such as Lido.
  • Ongoing discussions around validator sets require clearer guidance for Node Operators (NOs).

This proposal ensures that the SNOP on Validator Exits remains up to date with these protocol advancements and provides NOs with consistent operational expectations aligned with the future of Ethereum and the Lido protocol.

The proposed v3 builds on prior governance-approved standards, integrates community and contributor feedback, and adopts the standardized structure established across other SNOPs for clarity and long-term maintainability.

Overview of Changes & Additions

The main changes and additions include:

  • Integration of Triggerable Withdrawals: adapting NO responsibilities and processes to reflect the new mechanism for externally triggered withdrawals.
  • Clarification of Exit Procedures: addressing how the latest changes in the protocol affect exit behavior and reporting.
  • Standardized Structure and Definitions: bringing the SNOP into the unified documentation framework used across all recent revisions.
  • Extended Scope: ensuring applicability to NOs participating through Simple DVT, Community Staking, and future module types.
  • Explicit NO Responsibilities: clearer obligations around exit initiation, responsiveness to withdrawal triggers, and timely execution.
  • Updated Per-Module Consequences: revised accountability framework for non-conformance, reflecting new operational tooling and staking module designs.

NO Responsibilities

The key responsibilities arising for NOs using the Lido protocol with respect to validator exits are as follows:

  • Respond promptly to and, where applicable, initiate triggerable withdrawal events in accordance with the protocol’s operational timelines.
  • Maintain accurate exit and withdrawal configuration for all validators under their operation.
  • Ensure transparent communication and reporting when exit processes or triggers encounter issues.
  • Comply with operational best practices for withdrawal handling, safeguarding user funds, and validator integrity.

Official References

The full text of the proposed Standard Node Operator Protocol (SNOP) on Validator Exits v3 is available through the following sources:

Vote Outcomes

  • If the “For” option wins:

    The proposed Standard Node Operator Protocol (SNOP) on Validator Exits v3 will be used as the primary reference for NO interactions with the Lido protocol regarding validator exits and withdrawals, effective immediately following the conclusion of the vote.

  • If the “Against” option wins:

    The SNOP on Validator Exits v2 will remain in effect, and a revised version of v3 will be prepared based on community feedback for potential resubmission in a future vote.

03Mismatch analysis

AIMismatch analysis by Kvorum

A calldata-vs-description analysis is not generated yet. Review the decoded actions →

04Actions

0 total

This proposal carries no on-chain actions.

05Tally

Summed from votes

Voters97
VP participating0
Outcome (current)For
Current support100%

06Voters

97 total
Filter:
VoterChoice% of totalRationale
4A0x4af8…6a0bFor023.08%—1y ago
420x42e6…3fb0For018.06%—1y ago
6C0x6cd6…b52eFor012.89%—1y ago
810x8172…922eFor09.67%—1y ago
7E0x7ee0…bb6cFor09.04%—1y ago
LIlido.banteg.eth0x55bc…f0faFor06.26%—1y ago
6D0x6d8d…0cccFor05.90%—1y ago
3F0x3fb1…4c8aFor03.01%—1y ago
A40xa418…b737For02.26%—1y ago
B60xb664…f890For02.23%—1y ago
6F0x6f9b…8a1dFor02.22%—1y ago
1F0x1f76…5ed6For01.94%—1y ago
390x3983…777aFor01.26%—1y ago
E80xe80e…28e8For00.57%—1y ago
870x8787…ea52For00.56%—1y ago
290x29b5…2c2fFor00.28%—1y ago
980x9830…bd94For00.14%—1y ago
3D0x3ddc…05b0For00.14%—1y ago
060x06a9…bba0For00.14%—1y ago
3D0x3d63…4afcFor00.11%—1y ago
910x919a…a361For00.10%—1y ago
4D0x4d6c…5aaeFor00.06%—1y ago
B90xb933…8dd1For00.04%—1y ago
B70xb792…89d7For00.02%—1y ago
8A0x8ab6…e0baFor00.00%—1y ago
7A0x7af3…8df3For00.00%—1y ago
C50xc554…7759For00.00%—1y ago
050x0579…ca09For00.00%—1y ago
3D0x3d5a…b97fFor00.00%—1y ago
480x487c…65f7For00.00%—1y ago
4D0x4d63…cbb1For00.00%—1y ago
A10xa1ed…4bc4For00.00%—1y ago
690x699a…80f9For00.00%—1y ago
820x82f0…c410For00.00%—1y ago
050x058e…d205For00.00%—1y ago
F60xf673…853aFor00.00%—1y ago
520x5243…3440Against00.00%—1y ago
EC0xecc2…6ac9For00.00%—1y ago
C10xc1c2…24f8For00.00%—1y ago
470x478e…1d61For00.00%—1y ago
170x1729…b879For00.00%—1y ago
9D0x9d57…65a5For00.00%—1y ago
2F0x2f2f…f78aFor00.00%—1y ago
320x3279…3a5bFor00.00%—1y ago
B30xb3bf…6ce4For00.00%—1y ago
1B0x1b9d…61ddFor00.00%—1y ago
010x0151…c3b9For00.00%—1y ago
BF0xbfd1…4f66For00.00%—1y ago
C90xc973…9457For00.00%—1y ago
AF0xaf90…7b3bFor00.00%—1y ago
Showing 50

07Forum

No forum thread is confidently linked to this proposal.

08Similar proposals

AI · embeddings

No semantically similar proposals found yet.