KVORUM
lidoSource: Snapshot · #0x58fc14fac3bcdf65c7b9dd871ec555da8c2ff6387b9a443ddf5fce5f41d4db91

Should Attestant continue in the Curated set following the acquisition by Bitwise?

succeededJan 30, 2025, 04:00 PM UTCsignaling · non-bindingbyDB0xdbbc…1cb6View on Snapshot ↗

01Summary

AISummary by Kvorum

An AI summary is not generated yet. Read the description →

02Description

213 words

Background and Context

Node operator Attestant BVI Limited was recently acquired by Bitwise. According to Attestant, the infrastructure will remain unchanged in terms of deployment (bare metal), and the geographical location will stay the same. The only change is that Attestant BVI and its ultimate shareholder are now Bitwise, rather than the Attestant team themselves.

The Lido Node Operator Sub-Governance Group (LNOSG) has reviewed the provided information related to the transition and found no reason to propose ceasing the operator’s participation in Lido on Ethereum Curated set.

The LNOSG supports continuing collaboration with this operator, as the operator has confirmed on the forum that no changes are planned following the acquisition and has expressed their readiness to continue their work.

The detailed conclusion was published on the forum and may offer further help to voters in their consideration.

Proposal

Allow Attestant BVI Limited to continue Node Operations in Lido on Ethereum as-is.

Voting Outcomes

A vote "For" indicates agreement with this proposal. If "For" wins, Attestant will continue Node Operations in Lido on Ethereum as-is.

A vote "Against" indicates disagreement with this proposal. As the range of dispute options is extensive, a vote "Against" entails a discussion to identify which options should be considered and brought to a subsequent vote.

03Mismatch analysis

AIMismatch analysis by Kvorum

A calldata-vs-description analysis is not generated yet. Review the decoded actions →

04Actions

0 total

This proposal carries no on-chain actions.

05Tally

Summed from votes

Voters102
VP participating0
Outcome (current)For
Current support100%

06Voters

102 total
Filter:
VoterChoice% of totalRationale
4A0x4af8…6a0bFor022.76%—2y ago
810x8172…922eFor010.32%—2y ago
7E0x7ee0…bb6cFor08.83%—2y ago
6D0x6d8d…0cccFor06.35%—2y ago
LIlido.banteg.eth0x55bc…f0faFor06.34%—2y ago
9C0x9ca8…36afFor05.53%—2y ago
510x510a…8d0eFor05.34%—2y ago
A40xa418…b737For04.53%—2y ago
3D0x3ddc…05b0For04.47%—2y ago
FF0xff41…a67bFor04.41%—2y ago
B90xb933…8dd1For04.32%—2y ago
BE0xbeb3…7646For03.66%—2y ago
110x1109…43daFor03.59%—2y ago
1F0x1f76…5ed6For02.21%—2y ago
6A0x6a39…4bd2For02.13%—2y ago
7A0x7a59…8e22For00.99%—2y ago
A20xa2ff…7be9For00.74%—2y ago
870x8787…ea52For00.57%—2y ago
2C0x2cc1…4df1For00.49%—2y ago
B60xb664…f890For00.49%—2y ago
6F0x6f9b…8a1dFor00.35%—2y ago
290x29b5…2c2fFor00.30%—2y ago
100x10a2…36f3For00.25%—2y ago
B30xb3ba…ebc5For00.25%—2y ago
620x624d…2cd0For00.23%—2y ago
980x9830…bd94For00.14%—2y ago
060x06a9…bba0For00.14%—2y ago
220x225d…093aFor00.09%—2y ago
780x78d1…753aFor00.07%—2y ago
5F0x5fdc…b69fFor00.04%—2y ago
490x49f1…6cdbFor00.03%—2y ago
3F0x3fb1…4c8aFor00.02%—2y ago
8A0x8ab6…e0baFor00.00%—2y ago
7A0x7af3…8df3For00.00%—2y ago
050x0579…4048For00.00%—2y ago
3D0x3d5a…b97fFor00.00%—2y ago
2F0x2f15…631fFor00.00%—2y ago
580x5820…a011For00.00%—2y ago
B70xb792…89d7For00.00%—2y ago
520x5243…3440Against00.00%—2y ago
EC0xecc2…6ac9For00.00%—2y ago
C10xc1c2…24f8For00.00%—2y ago
E60xe6b5…f1fdFor00.00%—2y ago
530x53c4…3584For00.00%—2y ago
500x500f…7d0bFor00.00%—2y ago
C40xc48b…75b6For00.00%—2y ago
270x2748…ac26For00.00%—2y ago
050x0579…ca09For00.00%—2y ago
2D0x2d67…ac5cFor00.00%—2y ago
650x659f…dadcFor00.00%—2y ago
Showing 50

07Forum

No forum thread is confidently linked to this proposal.

08Similar proposals

AI · embeddings

No semantically similar proposals found yet.