KVORUM
lidoSource: Snapshot · #0x5471017e6278ea5fa64c471ae2854274c079a4a3306cd70d65a7e73476a3a2e6

Increasing number of active Easy Track motions run simultaneously

succeededMar 21, 2023, 07:00 PM UTCsignaling · non-bindingbyDB0xdbbc…1cb6View on Snapshot ↗

01Summary

AISummary by Kvorum

An AI summary is not generated yet. Read the description →

02Description

322 words

TL;DR

This a proposal to increase the maximum number of active Easy Track motions, lightweight votings, run simultaneously in order not to have a traffic jam with processing active motions, when this is highly needed.

Background

In the last 2 weeks of February Lido protocol experienced an active inflow of several whales, which motivated Node Operators to request staking limit increases. This resulted in Easy Track congestion as most new motions were related to increasing node operator staking limits – since February 27, a day after a huge influx of stake from one whale (200,100 ETH), there were only 16 falling under “Increase node operator staking limit” category, apart from other open categories “Top up referral partner”, “Top up LDO referral partner”, “Top up LDO TRP”.

Due to the current limit on the number of concurrent Easy Track motions (12), other actors needed to wait once some motion was completed and enacted to submit theirs. More details can be found on the Research Forum.

Proposal

We propose to increase the limit of active/ongoing Easy Track motions, as under the current settings there could not be more than 12 simultaneous motions. The absolute top the Easy Track contract allows is 24 at the same time (this is hardcoded, and can be changed only via a contract change and redeployment of the whole Easy Track setup, but this is not the issue of this proposal).

Based on this and to avoid an unnecessary overburden in the future, when it is unneeded and may impose a loss of potential profit, we propose to increase either by 4 to 16 active concurrent motions, or by 12 to 24 active concurrent motions.

Please vote

You are welcomed to vote below and help to decrease Easy Track votings overburden in the future thanks to your choice.

If this proposal is supported, then on-chain vote to set a new motions count limit will be launched.

03Mismatch analysis

AIMismatch analysis by Kvorum

A calldata-vs-description analysis is not generated yet. Review the decoded actions →

04Actions

0 total

This proposal carries no on-chain actions.

05Tally

Summed from votes

Voters1.5K
VP participating0
Outcome (current)Increase the limit by 4 to 16
Current support—

06Voters

1469 total
Filter:
VoterChoice% of totalRationale
B80xb842…82b0Increase the limit by 12 to 24036.46%—4y ago
CC0xcc18…2575Increase the limit by 4 to 16018.53%—4y ago
D10xd1c7…0aaeIncrease the limit by 4 to 16011.95%—4y ago
E00xe017…4e63Increase the limit by 4 to 16010.81%—4y ago
510x510a…8d0eIncrease the limit by 4 to 1608.35%—4y ago
C00xc006…8123Increase the limit by 4 to 1607.20%—4y ago
8B0x8b16…765bIncrease the limit by 4 to 1606.55%—4y ago
620x624d…2cd0Increase the limit by 12 to 2400.08%—4y ago
5B0x5ba4…b1edIncrease the limit by 4 to 1600.02%—4y ago
880x8845…53f5Increase the limit by 4 to 1600.01%—4y ago
580x58fb…57f8Increase the limit by 4 to 1600.01%—4y ago
200x2068…36efIncrease the limit by 4 to 1600.01%—4y ago
7A0x7af3…8df3Increase the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
3D0x3d5a…b97fIncrease the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
270x27d8…8975No change00.00%—4y ago
D50xd589…5685Increase the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
5D0x5d47…6068Increase the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
550x55c5…7bccIncrease the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
3C0x3cf0…3256Increase the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
030x035e…17d3Increase the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
D90xd929…b62cIncrease the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
940x9402…e0ddIncrease the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
B40xb4dc…7e9aIncrease the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
F30xf32c…ac02Increase the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
280x2806…523aIncrease the limit by 12 to 2400.00%—4y ago
910x9109…43a3Increase the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
2F0x2f62…b669Increase the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
A40xa436…99c4Increase the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
A60xa647…a9b8Increase the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
5E0x5e45…3248Increase the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
480x48a9…feb7Increase the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
AB0xab56…1b6fIncrease the limit by 12 to 2400.00%—4y ago
840x84f9…4a4bIncrease the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
6C0x6cc1…9415Increase the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
5C0x5c90…771fIncrease the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
9F0x9fee…8bfaIncrease the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
9F0x9fc7…20d7Increase the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
5A0x5a4f…2de6Increase the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
D90xd939…6d1fIncrease the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
9E0x9ed2…1a04Increase the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
B70xb7a3…abc9Increase the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
3A0x3aef…730cIncrease the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
380x38fe…59f0Increase the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
140x14bd…e36aIncrease the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
9A0x9adf…493cIncrease the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
CB0xcbb5…6973Increase the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
DF0xdf16…b97cIncrease the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
700x70df…1889Increase the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
1D0x1da8…fcbbIncrease the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
8E0x8eec…b111Increase the limit by 4 to 1600.00%—4y ago
Showing 50

07Forum

No forum thread is confidently linked to this proposal.

08Similar proposals

AI · embeddings

No semantically similar proposals found yet.