KVORUM
lidoSource: Snapshot · #0x4cba967e58a2261524dd698aad1d0edefc537c8d53f1a543702d2860ffa756ed

Increase ‘Proposal Threshold’ within Lido’s Snapshot Space

succeededJun 9, 2022, 04:00 PM UTCsignaling · non-bindingbyE60xe615…5f2bView on Snapshot ↗

01Summary

AISummary by Kvorum

An AI summary is not generated yet. Read the description →

02Description

251 words

Context

The threshold in Lido’s snapshot space is currently set at 100 $LDO. Any individual holding 100 $LDO ($253 USD at the time of writing) can create a proposal within Lido’s space.

Problem

Due to the low threshold, there has been an increase in spam within Lido’s Snapshot space. A recent example of this can be seen with the proposal here , which is proposing that ‘Lido add BNB’. In this proposal, there is no summary , and no link to forum discussion . Upon further investigation, it appears that the forum discussion does not exist. The proposer was able to propose this by way of holding 106 $LDO ($267.12 USD at time of writing). The recent increase in spam within Snapshot should be handled by increasing the proposal threshold, ideally leaving opportunity for thoughtful proposals/proposers while also creating a barrier in an effort to discourage spam.

Proposed Solution:

The ‘Proposal Threshold’ on Lido’s Snapshot Space should be raised to 1,000 $LDO.

If the proposer does not have enough $LDO to meet the Snapshot proposal threshold, the Lido team or community members can post on behalf of proposers.

Process for Requesting Proxy:

Any proposer may ask to create the Snapshot on their behalf after a week of forum discussion. Ping @kadmil of the Lido team or reach out to @timbeiko and @Hasu, who have volunteered to act as proxies. The only filter is not to have spam proposals/votes. The Snapshot creation may take up to a week.

03Mismatch analysis

AIMismatch analysis by Kvorum

A calldata-vs-description analysis is not generated yet. Review the decoded actions →

04Actions

0 total

This proposal carries no on-chain actions.

05Tally

Summed from votes

Voters305
VP participating0
Outcome (current)For
Current support100%

06Voters

305 total
Filter:
VoterChoice% of totalRationale
E00xe017…4e63For033.87%—5y ago
8B0x8b16…765bFor027.00%—5y ago
B90xb933…8dd1For011.48%—5y ago
820x82a8…f125For010.94%—5y ago
960x9648…ea04For09.16%—5y ago
100x10f5…d2feFor03.96%—5y ago
FB0xfb03…ff95Abstain02.89%—5y ago
0B0x0b30…db52For00.22%—5y ago
A70xa7ec…a65cFor00.13%—5y ago
C10xc15f…31f2For00.09%—5y ago
8D0x8d07…a265For00.09%—5y ago
C40xc4b5…8544For00.05%—5y ago
670x67b9…33aaFor00.01%—5y ago
FD0xfd65…1ca3For00.01%—5y ago
660x666f…21fcFor00.01%—5y ago
AD0xadf6…7497For00.01%—5y ago
0C0x0ca3…92a4For00.01%—5y ago
DA0xda2c…30b0For00.01%—5y ago
9C0x9c4c…131eFor00.01%—5y ago
0F0x0fcc…6818For00.00%—5y ago
480x4862…af99For00.00%—5y ago
C60xc608…1375For00.00%—5y ago
FA0xfaf4…2802For00.00%—5y ago
940x94b7…2af6For00.00%—5y ago
A20xa280…e150For00.00%—5y ago
D20xd296…762dFor00.00%—5y ago
PIpizzallama.eth0x32a5…525dFor00.00%—5y ago
180x18b4…2adcFor00.00%—5y ago
280x2850…8dbfFor00.00%—5y ago
B50xb532…ef22For00.00%—5y ago
000x0005…90e3For00.00%—5y ago
630x63ea…d217Against00.00%—5y ago
700x70ae…e894For00.00%—5y ago
FE0xfe3d…5f7cFor00.00%—5y ago
C10xc146…5aafAgainst00.00%—5y ago
9A0x9aca…fdd6For00.00%—5y ago
B40xb4dc…7e9aFor00.00%—5y ago
D90xd929…b62cFor00.00%—5y ago
D50xd589…5685For00.00%—5y ago
5F0x5f74…ace9For00.00%—5y ago
E80xe889…b946Abstain00.00%—5y ago
6B0x6b68…3428For00.00%—5y ago
E60xe615…5f2bFor00.00%—5y ago
7E0x7ec2…c566For00.00%—5y ago
D80xd897…e8e4Abstain00.00%—5y ago
1F0x1fa1…1f9bFor00.00%—5y ago
5C0x5cac…3cfdFor00.00%—5y ago
120x12ba…e357For00.00%—5y ago
5E0x5e45…3248For00.00%—5y ago
900x900d…cf69For00.00%—5y ago
Showing 50

07Forum

No forum thread is confidently linked to this proposal.

08Similar proposals

AI · embeddings

No semantically similar proposals found yet.