KVORUM
lidoSource: Snapshot · #0x10abedcc563b66b1adee60825e78c387105110fa4a1e7354ab57bc9cc1e675c2

Should Lido consider self-limiting?

succeededJul 1, 2022, 09:00 AM UTCsignaling · non-bindingbyDB0xdbbc…1cb6View on Snapshot ↗

01Summary

AISummary by Kvorum

An AI summary is not generated yet. Read the description →

02Description

133 words

Following up on the discussion on governance forum, I'm setting up a vote to determine the next steps on this decision.

If you think Lido should consider decreasing inbound stake flow in any shape, form or severity - vote for the first option ("yes, let's self-limit"). If that option wins, we’ll find out what form of self-limiting we should be exploring on the second leg of the vote.

If you think there’s no problem to respond to, or if you think it should be responded in a way that does not involve self-limiting (e.g. governance minimization, dual governance, etc), vote for the second option ("no, don't self-limit"). If that option wins, the team will not continue working further in that direction unless the question is brought up again with significant support behind it.

03Mismatch analysis

AIMismatch analysis by Kvorum

A calldata-vs-description analysis is not generated yet. Review the decoded actions →

04Actions

0 total

This proposal carries no on-chain actions.

05Tally

Summed from votes

Voters278
VP participating0
Outcome (current)no, don't self-limit
Current support0.2%

06Voters

278 total
Filter:
VoterChoice% of totalRationale
450x4580…5f81no, don't self-limit024.90%—4y ago
B80xb842…82b0no, don't self-limit021.97%—4y ago
7E0x7ee0…bb6cno, don't self-limit09.84%—4y ago
B90xb933…8dd1no, don't self-limit07.38%—4y ago
820x82a8…f125no, don't self-limit07.03%—4y ago
FE0xfe45…2e4bno, don't self-limit06.20%—4y ago
960x9648…ea04no, don't self-limit05.89%—4y ago
4A0x4a7c…c7ceno, don't self-limit03.62%—4y ago
440x44a6…8e48no, don't self-limit02.61%—4y ago
500x5066…a068no, don't self-limit02.02%—4y ago
C10xc19d…8045no, don't self-limit01.55%—4y ago
F90xf9aa…1923no, don't self-limit01.40%—4y ago
290x2983…c150no, don't self-limit01.31%—4y ago
710x716d…2095no, don't self-limit01.13%—4y ago
660x6666…1761no, don't self-limit00.68%—4y ago
320x3225…bbefno, don't self-limit00.62%—4y ago
430x43dc…4012no, don't self-limit00.52%—4y ago
790x7944…330eno, don't self-limit00.16%—4y ago
FD0xfd10…d894no, don't self-limit00.16%—4y ago
9C0x9cfa…4f91no, don't self-limit00.16%—4y ago
0B0x0b30…db52yes, let's self-limit00.14%—4y ago
BB0xbb13…6ebfno, don't self-limit00.10%—4y ago
860x86ed…1996no, don't self-limit00.08%—4y ago
8D0x8d07…a265no, don't self-limit00.06%—4y ago
2E0x2e93…f99dno, don't self-limit00.06%—4y ago
CF0xcf5d…c932no, don't self-limit00.06%—4y ago
870x8794…d0fbno, don't self-limit00.04%—4y ago
C30xc35a…b51bno, don't self-limit00.03%—4y ago
E90xe947…6f22no, don't self-limit00.03%—4y ago
770x7715…d79fno, don't self-limit00.02%—4y ago
660x666f…21fcno, don't self-limit00.02%—4y ago
460x4601…839bno, don't self-limit00.02%—4y ago
240x24fa…3f56no, don't self-limit00.02%—4y ago
450x45d6…bb60no, don't self-limit00.02%—4y ago
230x23d3…c9d7yes, let's self-limit00.01%—4y ago
E50xe5b1…deedno, don't self-limit00.01%—4y ago
8F0x8f68…617bno, don't self-limit00.01%—4y ago
250x25d9…8cd4yes, let's self-limit00.01%—4y ago
780x7850…94dcyes, let's self-limit00.01%—4y ago
770x77b5…ecc0no, don't self-limit00.01%—4y ago
020x028d…2e85no, don't self-limit00.01%—4y ago
510x5164…1a59no, don't self-limit00.01%—4y ago
670x67b9…33aano, don't self-limit00.01%—4y ago
CB0xcb9d…37b5no, don't self-limit00.01%—4y ago
130x130f…97d5no, don't self-limit00.01%—4y ago
FD0xfd65…1ca3no, don't self-limit00.01%—4y ago
370x3790…8c64no, don't self-limit00.01%—4y ago
0C0x0ca3…92a4no, don't self-limit00.01%—4y ago
B90xb9b9…5473no, don't self-limit00.00%—4y ago
4E0x4ec2…2e35no, don't self-limit00.00%—4y ago
Showing 50

07Forum

No forum thread is confidently linked to this proposal.

08Similar proposals

AI · embeddings

No semantically similar proposals found yet.