KVORUM
lidoSource: Snapshot · #0x008ce8f95382c70216820a39d717c6b494348aa474917b6351819af527bc2a54

Create a Committee for Hiring

succeededMar 16, 2022, 04:00 PM UTCsignaling · non-bindingby030x039b…d826View on Snapshot ↗

01Summary

AISummary by Kvorum

An AI summary is not generated yet. Read the description →

02Description

201 words

Full proposal: https://research.lido.fi/t/proposal-to-form-resourcing-and-compensation-committee-rcc/1767

We are asking the community to discuss and vote on a resourcing and compensation committee (RCC) to streamline the hiring, onboarding, remuneration and payout process for DAO contributors below the senior-most level. Team leads or department heads for example would still be subject to the proposal-based hiring process governed by the DAO.

Summary

Create a governance committee dedicated to managing, executing, tracking, and reporting on hiring and contributor-related operating expenses for full time DAO members.

Allow the committee autonomy to deploy a bi-yearly allocated resourcing budget as they see fit with quarterly reporting on the decision-making process and allowing for community feedback. Budgets will be proposed on an annual basis and may be revised during the year. Funding for each “budget period” (6 months) will be disbursed from the Lido treasury to the RCC wallet twice a year, via DAO vote.

Eventually, once Lido’s departments grow large enough it will be necessary for each department to take on this work independently, but for now, there are both efficiencies and privacy-related motivations to conduct all of this work through one committee.

Budgeting details will be in a separate proposal to not distract from the operational considerations of the RCC.

03Mismatch analysis

AIMismatch analysis by Kvorum

A calldata-vs-description analysis is not generated yet. Review the decoded actions →

04Actions

0 total

This proposal carries no on-chain actions.

05Tally

Summed from votes

Voters23
VP participating0
Outcome (current)Yes
Current support100%

06Voters

23 total
Filter:
VoterChoice% of totalRationale
CC0xcc18…2575Yes031.42%—5y ago
E00xe017…4e63Yes031.36%—5y ago
B80xb842…82b0Yes027.82%—5y ago
100x10f5…d2feYes06.17%—5y ago
110x1109…43daYes02.88%—5y ago
0B0x0b30…db52Yes00.18%—5y ago
8D0x8d07…a265Yes00.07%—5y ago
FD0xfde0…626cYes00.05%—5y ago
260x2654…c108Yes00.01%—5y ago
860x86c6…565aYes00.01%—5y ago
FD0xfd65…1ca3Yes00.01%—5y ago
240x2402…c56aNo00.01%—5y ago
9E0x9e2e…10a6Yes00.01%—5y ago
500x5048…2a53Yes00.00%—5y ago
700x70ae…e894Yes00.00%—5y ago
700x700c…8e9aYes00.00%—5y ago
FC0xfc79…76d3Yes00.00%—5y ago
940x9402…e0ddYes00.00%—5y ago
D60xd662…2d94Yes00.00%—5y ago
4D0x4d64…cc7eYes00.00%—5y ago
3A0x3a40…9abcYes00.00%—5y ago
970x9796…4f33Yes00.00%—5y ago
480x48c7…0f91Yes00.00%—5y ago
Showing 23

07Forum

No forum thread is confidently linked to this proposal.

08Similar proposals

AI · embeddings

No semantically similar proposals found yet.