Renewing the Community Multisig
01Summary
Renewing the Community Multisig for 1 year with updated signer membership (removing TennisBowling and BLCK, adding Michael; adding ChainSecurity & Certora as signers who forfeit stipends). Total budget of 4507 COMP ($126k) for multisig signer compensation at $1.5k/month per signer. Quality engineer role now covered by ChainSecurity & Certora's Security Service Provider mandate. Funds managed by CGWG.
- Type
- governance change
- Funding
- $$126,000 equivalent (4507 COMP at $41.25/COMP, includes 10% buffer)
Key changes
- Renew Community Multisig powers for 1 additional year, including emergency pause, proposal whitelisting, borrow cap setting, and proposal guardian (canceling malicious proposals)(high)
- Update multisig signer membership by removing TennisBowling and BLCK, adding Michael as independent signer, and adding ChainSecurity & Certora as signers (who forfeit stipends)(high)
- Transition quality engineer role to ChainSecurity & Certora's Security Service Provider mandate, eliminating separate funding for this role(medium)
- Provide $1.5k/month stipend for 7 multisig signers (5 active community members + 2 ChainSecurity & Certora signers with forfeited stipends)(medium)
Notable concerns
- Removal of two previous signers (TennisBowling and BLCK) represents change in governance structure
- Documentation transition from DefiSafety to ChainSecurity & Certora requires coordination
- Multisig holds significant protocol powers including emergency pause and proposal cancellation capabilities
Generated by Kvorum
02Description
Renewing the Community Multisig
Authors
@cylon, @PGov (CGWG)
Summary
This proposal extends the initial Formalizing the Community Multisig proposal that was approved earlier in April 2025, for a 1 year duration.
The initial proposed vote detailed an improved community multisig process and documentation. A robust and detailed process was created to professionalise the community multisig to meet industry level security and opsec standards. This process improves transparency and clarity for the Multisig and ensures all signers are active.
Background
At Compound, the community multisig was initially created to:
- Pause the Compound protocol in case of emergency
- Whitelist accounts for submitting governance proposals that did not require a COMP threshold to be met
- Set borrow caps (Compound V2 only)
The power of the community multisig was recently modified to also include cancelling malicious proposals as well following the passage of Proposal 303 to add a Proposal Guardian. This power must be periodically renewed by governance. We propose proactively extending the proposal guardian for 1 additional year.
Over the years, the process for onboarding and operational procedures for this very important multisig have been undefined. In the first trial period, the multisig signers have internally doxxed themselves and worked together to set some ground rules for the responsibility.
The current multisig signers and members can be found here: Forums
Improvements
With the passing and onboarding of the recent security provider for the DAO, ChainSecurity & Certora’s approved mandate now cover the scope of the quality engineer role, previously held by the DefiSafety team.
The DefiSafety team was incredibly helpful in first formalizing the multisig and has maintained these documents for the DAO to keep track of:
- History Document for the multisig
- Detailed Activities Document showing all transactions and signers, documenting its management process. This includes what the Multisig is capable of, who the signers are, what their responsibilities are, and their proof of humanity. It includes how the signers will communicate when an issue has been raised. It describes the regular testing and how the resulting executed transactions are documented. This includes periodic test “fire drills” each quarter.
- Shorter summary document highlighting main points
With DefiSafety’s role as the quality engineer now under ChainSecurity & Certora’s mandate, the CGWG will work with the team to transition any documents over and maintain continued updates and support. Further, the DefiSafety is encouraged and expected to apply for a grant from the Compound Grants Program to facilitate help as needed.
Additionally, the Proposal Guardian has recently been extended for 1 year in a prior governance vote.
Proposal
As part of the transition in Security Service Provider, we have added signers ChainSecurity & Certora onto the multsig. These new signers have elected to forfeit their stipends as part of their Security Service Partnership with Compound.
After consultation with the Foundation and discussion with current multisig members, signer membership was recently reevaluated to keep the current signer set composed of active community members. This includes removing TennisBowling and BLCK, and adding Michael as an additional independent signer.
Additionally, as mentioned above, with the transition of the quality engineer role to ChainSecurity and Certora, the original funding here will no longer be needed. The CGWG will oversee transitioning documents, and will coordinate with respective teams as needed.
Budget
For a 1 year renewal, we propose:
- Multisig Signers (7): $1.5k/month/signer => $126k (ChainSecurity & Certora have forfeited their stipends)
- Quality Engineer: $0 (included in recent SSP RFP Mandate for ChainSecurity & Certora; CGWG will facilitate document updates)
Total: $126k
Similar to the prior vote, the funds will be sent to the CGWG who will be tasked with paying the multisig signers, including setting up streams and maintaining documentation and updates with DefiSafety. We have used a price of $41.25/Comp, resulting in $126,000/$30.75 = 4097.5 COMP. Given the extended duration of the program, we are requesting a 10% buffer in COMP, bringing the request to 4507 COMP.
Edit: This proposal has been resubmitted to reprice for substantial price movements, as well as align the voting period with weekdays.
03Mismatch analysis
The proposal describes a single funding action: granting 4507 COMP to the CGWG to cover a 1-year renewal of multisig signer stipends. The decoded calldata contains exactly one action, a _grantComp call for 4507000000000000000000 wei, which equals 4507 COMP after accounting for 18 decimals — matching the stated amount precisely. The recipient address is presumably the CGWG multisig/treasury address as described; no other address or purpose is referenced in either the description or calldata, so there is no target mismatch to flag. The narrative details about signer membership changes (adding/removing individuals, forfeited stipends) are governance/off-chain administrative matters handled by the multisig itself and are not expected to appear as on-chain actions, so their absence from the calldata is not a discrepancy. There is no evidence of omitted actions, extra claims, or misleading characterization of amounts or targets. Given the single, clearly matching action, confidence is high and the overall assessment is consistent.
Generated by Kvorum
04Actions
- Target
- 0x3d98…cd3b
- Value
- 0 wei
- Function
- _grantComp(address,uint256)
- Arguments
{ "amount": "4507000000000000000000", "recipient": "0xfd947c72f09703210eeCbcab9c9206fE5e1Bb6e2" }- Calldata
05Tally
Summed from votes
06Voters
| Voter | Choice | % of total | Rationale | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B00xb06d…ae3d | For | 227K | 15.89% | — | 1y ago |
| 3F0x3fb1…4c8a | For | 104.8K | 7.34% | — | 1y ago |
| 360x36cc…ffc6 | Against | 87.6K | 6.13% | — | 1y ago |
| 660x66cd…65f9 | For | 80.1K | 5.61% | — | 1y ago |
| B30xb356…c826 | For | 51K | 3.57% | — | 1y ago |
| 2B0x2b38…bf33 | Abstain | 50K | 3.50% | — | 1y ago |
| 050x0579…ca09 | For | 50K | 3.50% | — | 1y ago |
| 680x683a…6c02 | For | 40.1K | 2.81% | — | 1y ago |
| 9D0x9d03…ec31 | Against | 40K | 2.80% | — | 1y ago |
| 930x93cb…1a08 | Against | 39.2K | 2.74% | — | 1y ago |
| 070x0703…961b | For | 30K | 2.10% | — | 1y ago |
| 130x13bd…8548 | For | 30K | 2.10% | — | 1y ago |
| B40xb49f…7948 | For | 30K | 2.10% | — | 1y ago |
| BB0xbbdd…9c09 | Against | 25K | 1.75% | — | 1y ago |
| CA0xcad6…b169 | Against | 25K | 1.75% | — | 1y ago |
| 480x4880…422c | Against | 25K | 1.75% | — | 1y ago |
| C10xc153…4137 | Against | 25K | 1.75% | — | 1y ago |
| E80xe89f…bb56 | Against | 25K | 1.75% | — | 1y ago |
| 130x1369…d22c | Against | 25K | 1.75% | — | 1y ago |
| B30xb318…ce1b | Against | 25K | 1.75% | — | 1y ago |
| 1E0x1e72…72a4 | Against | 25K | 1.75% | — | 1y ago |
| 900x90bd…73be | Against | 24.9K | 1.75% | — | 1y ago |
| 330x3318…98bb | Against | 24.9K | 1.75% | — | 1y ago |
| 550x55c0…60bf | Against | 24.9K | 1.74% | — | 1y ago |
| 4F0x4f3a…4a51 | Against | 24.9K | 1.74% | — | 1y ago |
| CA0xca4e…7f02 | Against | 24.9K | 1.74% | — | 1y ago |
| 400x4086…b6ee | Against | 24.7K | 1.73% | — | 1y ago |
| 4A0x4ac0…b5e3 | Against | 24.7K | 1.73% | — | 1y ago |
| 0B0x0b58…00f8 | Against | 24.7K | 1.73% | — | 1y ago |
| 2F0x2f93…8a8b | Against | 24.6K | 1.73% | — | 1y ago |
| 170x17d6…40d9 | Against | 24.4K | 1.71% | — | 1y ago |
| BA0xbaa3…89ac | Against | 24.3K | 1.70% | — | 1y ago |
| 4C0x4c98…ef82 | Against | 24K | 1.68% | — | 1y ago |
| 530x53cc…4042 | Against | 21K | 1.47% | — | 1y ago |
| 260x2676…864a | Against | 19.5K | 1.36% | — | 1y ago |
| 120x124e…374f | Against | 15.3K | 1.07% | — | 1y ago |
| 720x72c9…3883 | Against | 15.3K | 1.07% | — | 1y ago |
| CE0xce8a…8ca3 | For | 840 | 0.06% | — | 1y ago |
| B90xb933…8dd1 | For | 682.9 | 0.05% | — | 1y ago |
| C50xc554…7759 | For | 11.2 | 0.00% | — | 1y ago |
| 8B0x8bb9…ccc2 | For | 1.1 | 0.00% | — | 1y ago |
| 010x0151…c3b9 | For | 1.1 | 0.00% | — | 1y ago |
| D20xd2a7…5a0c | Abstain | 1 | 0.00% | — | 1y ago |
| 170x1729…b879 | For | 1 | 0.00% | — | 1y ago |
| 2F0x2f2f…f78a | For | 0.5 | 0.00% | — | 1y ago |
| 7F0x7f21…31e0 | For | 0.1 | 0.00% | — | 1y ago |
| E60xe6b4…2704 | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 1y ago |
| 380x38dc…472d | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 1y ago |
| A60xa6ac…2bf3 | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 1y ago |
| A00xa0d0…604a | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 1y ago |
07Forum
- Community Multisig Deployment ↗discourse · high confidence
- Request for Proposal (RFP): Compound DAO Security Service Provider (SSP) ↗discourse · high confidence
- [RFC] Formalizing the Community Multisig ↗discourse · high confidence
- [RFC] Renewing the Community Multisig ↗discourse · medium confidence
Arguments for
None surfaced.
Arguments against
None surfaced.
Notable participants
- arr00Core steward of the Community Multisig, initiated its deployment and managed signer changes throughout.
- calvinProvided initial documentation and updates on the multisig deployment and signer confirmations.
- gettyConfirmed multisig members' comfort with additional responsibilities before governance vote.
- adamDocumented and tracked multisig membership changes and signer updates.
- PGovParticipated in recent multisig membership reevaluation and provided detailed status updates.
- jbass-ozAnnounced addition of ChainSecurity and Certora as signers and threshold increment.
- blckOriginal multisig signer who confirmed acceptance of responsibilities.
- TennisBowlingCommunity member who replaced aaaaaaaaaaaaa and later was removed during membership reevaluation.
Generated by Kvorum
08Similar proposals
- compoundcanceledRenewing the Community Multisig99%
- compoundexecutedRenewing the Community Multisig99%
- compoundexecutedFormalizing the Community Multisig89%
- compoundexecutedResubmission: Extension of the COMP Yield Strategy72%
- compounddefeatedExtension of the COMP Yield Strategy71%
- compoundcanceledTrust Setup for DAO investment into GoldCOMP70%
- compounddefeatedTrust Setup for DAO investment into GoldCOMP69%
- compoundexecutedA Growth-Earmarked Treasury Strategy for Compound68%
- compoundexecutedCompound <> Morpho <> Polygon Collaboration63%
- compoundcanceledTreasury to Invest 5% of COMP holdings into goldCOMP Vault61%