Add tETH as collateral into cWstETHv3 on Mainnet
01Summary
Compound Growth Program proposes to add tETH as collateral to the cWstETHv3 market on Ethereum. This involves configuring tETH asset parameters based on Gauntlet recommendations and deploying a Comet contract upgrade.
- Type
- protocol addition
Key changes
- Add tETH (0xD11c452fc99cF405034ee446803b6F6c1F6d5ED8) as collateral asset to cWstETHv3 market with risk parameters: LTV 88%, liquidation incentive 91%, liquidation threshold 96%, and maximum supply 5000 tETH(high)
- Deploy and upgrade Comet to new version to enable tETH collateral support(high)
Generated by Kvorum
02Description
Add tETH as collateral into cWstETHv3 on Mainnet
Proposal summary
Compound Growth Program [AlphaGrowth] proposes to add tETH into cWstETHv3 on Ethereum network. This proposal takes the governance steps recommended and necessary to update a Compound III wstETH market on Ethereum. Simulations have confirmed the market’s readiness, as much as possible, using the Comet scenario suite. The new parameters include setting the risk parameters based on the recommendations from Gauntlet.
Further detailed information can be found on the corresponding proposal pull request and forum discussion.
Proposal Actions
The first action adds tETH asset as collateral with corresponding configurations.
The second action deploys and upgrades Comet to a new version.
03Mismatch analysis
The proposal claims two actions: (1) add tETH as collateral to the cWstETHv3 market with Gauntlet-recommended risk parameters, and (2) deploy and upgrade Comet to activate the change. The decoded calldata contains exactly two actions matching this: an addAsset call configuring tETH with a price feed, collateral factors (88%/91%/96%), and a 5000 tETH supply cap, targeting the same Comet proxy address referenced in the pull request, followed by a deployAndUpgradeTo call on the same proxy. Both actions target the expected Configurator and Comet proxy addresses, the order (add asset, then upgrade) matches the description's order, and no extraneous or missing actions are present. The description does not enumerate the exact numeric parameters, so there is nothing to contradict; it defers to the linked Gauntlet recommendation, which is a reasonable summarization. No value, target, or omission discrepancies were found.
Generated by Kvorum
04Actions
- Target
- 0x316f…36e3
- Value
- 0 wei
- Function
- addAsset(address,(address,address,uint8,uint64,uint64,uint64,uint128))
- Arguments
{ "cometProxy": "0x3D0bb1ccaB520A66e607822fC55BC921738fAFE3", "assetConfig": [ "0xD11c452fc99cF405034ee446803b6F6c1F6d5ED8", "0x87641f6BC5aD796ea2f30af2A79aB2CF30f74188", "18", "880000000000000000", "910000000000000000", "960000000000000000", "5000000000000000000000" ] }- Calldata
- Target
- 0x1ec6…8779
- Value
- 0 wei
- Function
- deployAndUpgradeTo(address,address)
- Arguments
{ "cometProxy": "0x3D0bb1ccaB520A66e607822fC55BC921738fAFE3", "configuratorProxy": "0x316f9708bB98af7dA9c68C1C3b5e79039cD336E3" }- Calldata
05Tally
Summed from votes
06Voters
| Voter | Choice | % of total | Rationale | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 660x66cd…65f9 | For | 80.1K | 12.60% | — | 2y ago |
| B90xb933…8dd1 | For | 80K | 12.59% | — | 2y ago |
| 070x0703…961b | For | 80K | 12.59% | — | 2y ago |
| 130x13bd…8548 | For | 80K | 12.59% | — | 2y ago |
| 3F0x3fb1…4c8a | For | 80K | 12.59% | — | 2y ago |
| B40xb49f…7948 | For | 80K | 12.59% | — | 2y ago |
| 220x2210…d02e | For | 53.1K | 8.36% | — | 2y ago |
| B30xb356…c826 | For | 50.3K | 7.92% | — | 2y ago |
| 050x0579…ca09 | For | 50K | 7.87% | — | 2y ago |
| 720x72c5…7708 | For | 1.2K | 0.19% | — | 2y ago |
| 210x21b3…fa75 | For | 502 | 0.08% | — | 2y ago |
| 580x5898…4848 | For | 200 | 0.03% | — | 2y ago |
| 050x0579…4048 | For | 11.2 | 0.00% | — | 2y ago |
| B70xb792…89d7 | For | 2 | 0.00% | — | 2y ago |
| 170x1729…b879 | For | 1 | 0.00% | — | 2y ago |
| C40xc47c…32bd | For | 0.1 | 0.00% | — | 2y ago |
| C60xc6d7…bfb2 | For | 0.1 | 0.00% | — | 2y ago |
| 610x61ff…9630 | For | 0.1 | 0.00% | — | 2y ago |
| 9A0x9a0f…8de8 | For | 0.1 | 0.00% | — | 2y ago |
| 250x2543…c807 | For | 0.1 | 0.00% | — | 2y ago |
| 060x06c4…66a2 | For | 0.1 | 0.00% | — | 2y ago |
| 130x1340…8385 | Against | 0 | 0.00% | — | 2y ago |
| 950x95f8…19c0 | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 2y ago |
| E50xe5bd…7091 | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 2y ago |
| 230x2360…2c34 | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 2y ago |
| 3B0x3b1a…1228 | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 2y ago |
| 000x00db…e32c | Abstain | 0 | 0.00% | — | 2y ago |
| 7D0x7d55…b6f6 | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 2y ago |
| CD0xcdaa…f2e5 | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 2y ago |
| 780x78c9…2f25 | Abstain | 0 | 0.00% | — | 2y ago |
07Forum
- Listing tETH on Compound ↗discourse · high confidence
Arguments for
- Listing tETH as collateral would increase borrowing and lending activity and generate additional fees for Compound by attracting yield-seeking users.— juny
- tETH diversifies Compound's yield-bearing asset base and aligns with Compound's vision for scalable, resilient DeFi collateral.— juny
- tETH enhances liquidity and capital efficiency for Compound by capturing staking rewards plus market arbitrage yield.— juny
- Listing tETH specifically on the ETH and wstETH markets makes the most sense given its underlying composition.— sharp
- Gauntlet's analysis found sufficient DEX liquidity, growing supply, and manageable volatility to support initializing tETH as collateral with specific conservative risk parameters (88% CF, 91% LF, 4% liquidation penalty, capped supply).— Gauntlet
- The proposed tETH audits have been fully completed (six audits conducted), addressing prior concerns about incomplete security review.— juny
Arguments against
- Listing should wait until additional pending audits (Omniscia, BlockSec) are completed, since prior audits found issues to fix.— misher
Unresolved concerns
- Slither static analysis checks failed repeatedly across multiple PR submissions without an explanation or resolution being posted in the thread.— dmitriywoofsoftware
- tETH's redemption mechanism is non-atomic, requiring a minimum of 200 wstETH and approximately 7 days to process, which poses liquidation risk considerations that were flagged but not further debated.— Gauntlet
- Relatively high tETH/WETH and tETH/wstETH volatility was noted as a risk factor influencing conservative parameter choices, without further community discussion on whether this is sufficiently mitigated.— Gauntlet
Notable participants
- junyProposer from Treehouse Protocol who authored the original proposal, provided background/motivation, and responded to audit concerns.
- sharpCommunity member who suggested the specific markets (ETH/wstETH) for listing tETH.
- misherRaised a cautionary concern about incomplete audits before listing.
- GauntletRisk manager who provided detailed parameter recommendations and liquidity/volatility analysis for tETH collateral on WETH and wstETH comets.
- dmitriywoofsoftwareTechnical contributor who posted deployment documentation, PR links, and test/action results for implementing tETH across Mainnet markets and later updating its price feed.
Generated by Kvorum
08Similar proposals
- compoundcanceledAdd tETH as collateral into cWETHv3 on Mainnet99%
- compoundexecutedAdd tETH as collateral into cWETHv3 on Mainnet99%
- compoundexecutedAdd weETH as collateral into cUSDTv3 on Mainnet92%
- compoundexecutedAdd wstETH as collateral into cUSDCv3 on Ethereum90%
- compoundexecutedAdd weETH as collateral into the cUSDCv3 on Mainnet90%
- compoundexecutedAdd mETH as collateral into cUSDTv3 on Mainnet90%
- compounddefeatedAdd weETH as collateral into cUSDCv3 on Mainnet90%
- compoundexecutedAdd weETH as collateral into cWETHv3 on Mainnet89%
- compoundexecutedAdd osETH as collateral into cWETHv3 on Mainnet89%
- compoundexecutedAdd USDC, USDT, WETH and weETH as collaterals into cWstETHv3 on Mainnet89%