I mapped each of the 9 decoded calldata actions to the 9 actions described in the proposal text. The market proxy addresses used as arguments (0xc3d688...cdc3 for USDC, 0x5D409e...7b56 for USDS, 0x3Afdc9...b0840 for USDT) are consistent across the setFactory, setExtensionDelegate, and deployAndUpgradeTo calls, and the ordering (USDC, USDS, USDT) matches the description's stated order exactly for all three groups of actions. The setFactory and setExtensionDelegate calls target the shared Configurator contract (0x316f97...336E3), which is normal since Configurator manages settings per-market via its first argument rather than via target_address — this is standard Compound III governance pattern, not a target mismatch. The deployAndUpgradeTo calls go to the CometProxyAdmin (0x1ec63b...e8779) and pass the Configurator address plus the specific market proxy, matching the 'deploys and upgrades' language. All three factory addresses are identical (a single new factory used for all three markets), which aligns with the summary describing one factory upgrade rolled out to three Comets. No values, targets, or omitted/extra actions were found that contradict the prose. The description is a high-level but accurate one-to-one summary of the calldata.