I mapped each description bullet to the corresponding Comet configurator call using standard Compound v3 naming conventions: 'Collateral Factor' = borrowCollateralFactor (action 0, new value 73% matches), 'Liquidation Factor' = liquidateCollateralFactor (action 1, new value 79% matches), and 'Liquidation Penalty' = 1 - liquidationFactor (action 2 sets liquidationFactor to 83%, giving a penalty of 17%, matching the description's target of 17%). The Supply Cap update (action 3) exactly matches the stated new cap of 2,600,000 UNI. Action 4 (deployAndUpgradeTo) is the routine boilerplate step used to push the updated asset configuration live via the Comet proxy - this is standard for all Compound v3 parameter-change proposals and its omission from the prose is not a meaningful discrepancy. All numeric targets in the calldata align with the 'to' values stated in the description once unit and naming conventions are normalized, so no value, target, or omission issues rise to the level of a discrepancy worth flagging to voters.'