KVORUM
compoundSource: Compound governor bravo · #189

CGP 2.0 Updates and Renewal

executedNov 3, 2023, 08:57 PM UTCby130x13bd…8548

01Summary

AISummary by Kvorumclaude-haiku-4-5

Questbook proposes renewing Compound Grants Program 2.0 with a $970,000 budget (20,847 COMP) for two quarters, supporting three domains: Dapps and Protocol Ideas ($450k), Multi-Chain/Cross-Chain Strategy and Dev Tooling ($370k), and Security Tooling ($150k). The program will operate using a delegated domain capital allocation model with community-elected domain allocators.

Type
treasury allocation
Funding
$$970,000

Key changes

  • Renewal of CGP 2.0 grants program with $970,000 budget for two quarters(high)
  • Budget reallocation: increased Dapps and Protocol Ideas domain to $450,000 (from implied lower amount in CGP 2.0) based on proposal volume(high)
  • Merger of Multi-Chain/Cross-Chain Strategy domain with Dev Tooling domain into single $370,000 allocation(medium)
  • Reduction of Security Tooling domain budget to $150,000(medium)
  • Continuation of domain allocator and program manager compensation at same hourly rates as CGP 2.0(medium)
  • Questbook to provide grants orchestration tool at no cost; continuation of Synapse (KYC) and Docusign (contracts) services(low)

Notable concerns

  • Domain allocators may work variable hours (15 hours/week estimated) depending on proposal volume
  • Questbook may charge retrospective grants for additional feature requests beyond standard tool provision
  • Program manager role changed from Sriharsha Karamchati to Ruchil due to bandwidth constraints
Contracts0xc00e94cb662c3520282e6f5717214004a7f26888
Generated by Kvorum
model: claude-haiku-4-5
provider: anthropic
profile: anthropic-fast-v1
prompt: v1.0
generated: 2mo ago
Read the description ↗

02Description

862 words

CGP 2.0 Updates and Renewal

Summary

After successfully running CGP 2.0 for two quarters and taking into consideration its impact, Questbook proposes to renew Compound Grants Program 2.0 with a budget of $970,000 = 20,847 COMP (calculated based on the most recent COMP price at the time of proposal submission, which was $46.53), spread across three domains. Questbook has received great feedback from the community, builders and domain allocators to renew the grants Compound Grants and are grateful for their valuable inputs.

For more details, see the full forum discussion here: https://www.comp.xyz/t/cgp-2-0-updates-and-renewal/4518/44.

Background and Progress

CGP 2.0 went live on Jan, 2023 with a grants budget of $800k spread across four domains. Over the past two quarters, CGP 2.0 domain allocators approved proposals requesting $670,000 in grants and disbursed a total of ~$410,000 to accepted proposals from a pool of 100+ proposals. These domain allocators were elected from the community and by the community. The specific information regarding the accepted proposals and the funded teams can be found here. Detailed information related to CGP 2.0’s funding breakdown, relevant metrics, insights, and proposed improvements going forward can be found here.

Proposal

Based on the impact and insights derived from CGP 2.0, we propose renewing CGP 2.0 with a budget of $970k for two quarters. The domain allocators will utilize this budget to fund proposals that align with Compound's roadmap. After researching, gathering feedback from domain allocators, active community members, and builders, we propose supporting the following domains:

Budget

RFPs, acceptance criteria and specifications for each domain

  1. Dapps and Protocol Ideas - Link
  2. Multi - Chain/Cross chain Strategy, Dev Tooling - Link
  3. Security Tooling - Link
  • Given that Dapps and New Protocol Ideas domain received more than twice the number of proposals compared to all the other domains combined, we propose merging Multi-chain and Cross-chain Strategy domain with the Dev Tooling domain.
  • Additionally, we propose increasing the allocated grants budget for Dapps and New Protocol Ideas domain to $450,000 and reducing the grants budget of the Security Tooling domain to $150,000 taking into consideration the number of proposals and allocated grant amounts for both domains during CGP 2.0.

Specifications and Implementation

Similar to the model implemented in CGP 2.0, the renewed grants program will be run using Delegated Domain Capital Allocation Model. Each domain allocator will run their respective domain on-chain for full transparency using Questbook. Additional details related to specifications and implementation be found here.

Compensation

Sourcing, reviewing, funding, marketing, tracking and nurturing proposals requires significant expertise and time commitment from the grants committee members and they should be fairly and competitively compensated for their efforts. Based on the learnings from CGP 2.0 specified above, we believe that a Program Manager is expected to dedicate approximately 25 hours per week, while the domain allocator is required to allocate an estimated 15 hours per week. However, these time commitments may vary depending on the number of proposals received for a domain and the domain allocators may exceed or work for less than 15 hours per week based on the proposal volumes. We propose keeping the hourly price the same for the Domain Allocators and the Program Manager as in the case of CGP 2.0.

Compensation

  • Questbook will provide the grants committee its grants orchestration tool free of cost. We suggest that the grants committee continue with Synapse for KYC services and Docusign for all contractual agreements, as we have been using these services throughout CGP 2.0.
  • However, for any specific asks from the grants team in order to run the process more smoothly, Questbook will charge for any additional feature requests based on the development overhead through a retrospective grant from Compound.

All unallocated funds from the first iteration of CGP 2.0 have been returned back to the Compound treasury

The KPIs, CGP 2.0 funding overview, expectations of the proposed renewal program along with the responsibilities of the Domain Allocators and the Program Manager can be found here.

About Questbook

  • Questbook (YC-W21) is a decentralized grant orchestration tool, currently being used by Polygon, AAVE, Celo & Solana.
  • Considering the achievements of CGP 2.0, as well as the time commitment and operational expertise necessary for running an effective grants program, Questbook will continue in the role of the Program Manager. Ruchil from Questbook will assume the responsibilities of the Program Manager in place of Sriharsha Karamchati due to bandwidth constraints. Ruchil was the program manager for Polygon facilitating the disbursal of ~ $1M in grants. He works with Solana foundation and ecosystems within Solana on a daily basis to help them design their grants program. He has received a grant of $250K from the Solana foundation for the same. He also worked closely with CGP 2.0 Program Manager and Grants team.

Disclaimer

Questbook has been collaborating with Michigan Blockchain to work through the details of this grant renewal proposal and communicate the merits to the broader Compound community. Michigan Blockchain was not provided consideration as a result of this collaboration as both proposers believe the passing of this proposal is in the best interest of the Compound protocol.

03Mismatch analysis

AIMismatch analysis by Kvorumclaude-sonnet-5
Consistent

The proposal describes a single financial action: transferring a renewal budget of $970,000, stated as 20,847 COMP, to fund the CGP 2.0 grants program. The decoded calldata contains exactly one action: a COMP token transfer of 20847000000000000000000 wei (=20,847 COMP with 18 decimals) to a specific address. The amount matches the description precisely after unit conversion, and there is only one action, consistent with a simple treasury disbursement for program renewal. The only gap is that the description does not name the specific recipient address, which is typical for grant program proposals that route funds to a known committee wallet, but since I cannot independently verify this address corresponds to Questbook's disclosed CGP 2.0 wallet, I flag it as a low-severity omission rather than a target mismatch, since there's no contradicting evidence and the amount is exactly right. Overall, the description and calldata are consistent in substance, magnitude, and intent, warranting a 'consistent' classification with high confidence.

Discrepancies

  • lowomitted in description

    The proposal never explicitly names or verifies the recipient wallet address that will receive the 20,847 COMP transfer. While it is reasonable to assume this is the standard Questbook/CGP 2.0 grants committee multisig used for fund disbursement, the specific address is not disclosed in the prose, making independent verification by a delegate impossible without external lookup.

Generated by Kvorum
model: claude-sonnet-5
provider: anthropic
profile: anthropic-strong-v1
prompt: v1.0
generated: 2mo ago
Review the decoded actions ↗

04Actions

1 total
#0transfer(address,uint256)chain 0x1
Target
0xc00e…6888
Value
0 wei
Function
transfer(address,uint256)
Arguments
{
  "amount": "20847000000000000000000",
  "address": "0x8524B12CB7710C75B53bAa9ca72B420542d24C13"
}
Calldata

05Tally

Summed from votes

Voters62
VP participating664.6K
Outcome (current)For
Current support96.6%

06Voters

62 total
Filter:
VoterChoice% of totalRationale
EA0xea6c…3bf7For331K49.80%—3y ago
B90xb933…8dd1For53.9K8.11%—3y ago
1D0x1d29…5d1fFor50K7.53%—3y ago
B40xb49f…7948For50K7.52%—3y ago
070x0703…961bFor50K7.52%—3y ago
130x13bd…8548For50K7.52%—3y ago
2B0x2b38…bf33Abstain32.5K4.89%—3y ago
3F0x3fb1…4c8aFor25.6K3.84%—3y ago
DAdakeshi.eth0xe3c9…6b21Against21.3K3.20%—3y ago
660x66cd…65f9Abstain368.60.06%—3y ago
8B0x8bc8…7276For1.10.00%—3y ago
CF0xcf8c…3620For1.10.00%—3y ago
E40xe459…e666For0.70.00%—3y ago
A60xa68a…31e5For0.40.00%—3y ago
2B0x2b12…31f0For0.30.00%—3y ago
500x50d2…5318For0.30.00%—3y ago
470x474a…21e3For0.20.00%—3y ago
C70xc769…b3e7For0.20.00%—3y ago
0B0x0bd6…d2bfFor0.20.00%—3y ago
6A0x6a93…367fFor0.20.00%—3y ago
060x06e4…9528For0.20.00%—3y ago
340x3496…126bFor0.20.00%—3y ago
C50xc521…12d8For0.10.00%—3y ago
720x721e…a77dFor0.10.00%—3y ago
2A0x2a88…be96For0.10.00%—3y ago
250x2509…8413For0.10.00%—3y ago
650x6581…082dFor0.10.00%—3y ago
9D0x9dde…d8dbFor0.10.00%—3y ago
770x77e3…d819For0.10.00%—3y ago
5D0x5d62…a2d0For0.10.00%—3y ago
ED0xed37…83baFor0.10.00%—3y ago
830x83d2…ee80For0.10.00%—3y ago
1E0x1e5a…495eFor0.10.00%—3y ago
470x472a…172fFor0.10.00%—3y ago
CC0xcc53…5b9fFor0.10.00%—3y ago
F20xf291…bf4eFor0.10.00%—3y ago
D00xd007…a63bFor0.10.00%—3y ago
0E0x0e73…23baFor0.10.00%—3y ago
040x04b2…0a47For0.10.00%—3y ago
930x93e3…608dFor0.10.00%—3y ago
760x76cd…8396For0.10.00%—3y ago
5F0x5f1c…f63aFor0.10.00%—3y ago
A00xa08f…167eFor0.10.00%—3y ago
060x06ee…6763For0.10.00%—3y ago
570x57e1…27acFor0.10.00%—3y ago
4A0x4afa…7426For0.10.00%—3y ago
D30xd328…7ce3For0.10.00%—3y ago
350x35a9…4871For0.10.00%—3y ago
FF0xff70…3ca5For0.10.00%—3y ago
270x273a…82ebFor0.10.00%—3y ago
Showing 50

07Forum

AIForum synthesis by Kvorumclaude-sonnet-5
sentiment · mixedthread · constructive

Arguments for

  • CGP 2.0 delivered strong measurable results (high NPS/experience scores, fast communication and funding turnaround, rising milestone completion rates) justifying renewal.— harsha, signal_corps, gjaldon
  • Numerous grantees reported smooth, transparent, and responsive experiences with domain allocators and Questbook, supporting renewal from firsthand experience.— bendi, juandi, blake, Warden_Finance, Anthias.xyz
  • The delegated domain allocation model with named, accountable domain allocators improved transparency, accountability, and query resolution compared to prior grant efforts.— Doo, cylon, Bobbay_StableNode, robinnagpal
  • The team demonstrated fiscal responsibility by returning all unallocated CGP 2.0 funds to the treasury before renewal.— harsha
  • The team proactively incorporated community and Labs feedback into a revised proposal (domain-specific RFPs, OZ audit involvement, TVL-linked KPIs, more frequent reporting), improving the program design ahead of the on-chain vote.— harsha, allthecolors, Doo, cylon

Arguments against

  • The renewal was being pushed for an on-chain vote before the community and Compound Labs had time to fully assess CGP 2.0's impact and before parallel growth-program discussions (Alastor/w3s, Alphagrowth) concluded.— kevin
  • Several funded projects appeared redundant with existing solutions (e.g., Comet on Optimism, a TypeScript SDK duplicating Compound.js, multiple analytics dashboards), questioning the value generated by the inbound-heavy funding approach.— kevin
  • No stakeholder in the program (Questbook, domain allocators, grantees) is specifically incentivized to safeguard project quality/security, risking reputational harm to Compound from low-quality or risky funded projects.— kevin
  • Milestones were largely completion-based rather than tied to real protocol value creation, meaning funds could be paid out for deliverables with little practical benefit or oversight.— kevin
  • The temperature-check vote used to justify renewal was skewed because most participants were grantees or others directly involved in CGP 2.0, undermining its representativeness.— kevin
  • Program visibility was poor for outside observers since tracking progress required manually digging through the Questbook dashboard, unlike other grant programs that publish regular public updates.— kevin

Unresolved concerns

  • Disagreement over the right balance between strict RFP-driven proposals versus open inbound calls, and whether allocators lean too far toward funding non-RFP or duplicative proposals to fully deploy budget.— kevin, allthecolors, kallolborah
  • Whether domain allocators face implicit pressure to allocate most of their budget even when proposal quality is mediocre, creating a potential incentive misalignment with the DAO's best interest.— kevin, allthecolors
  • Uncertainty about which metrics (TVL, transaction volume, other KPIs) best capture real value creation from funded projects, especially for long-horizon or hard-to-quantify domains like security or dev tooling.— kallolborah, allthecolors, kevin
  • No formally designated, empowered quality/security oversight stakeholder (e.g., OZ) was fully established despite agreement on the idea in principle.— kevin, allthecolors, harsha
  • Concern that grantees were given informal assurances about continuity into a next iteration before funding for that iteration was actually approved by the DAO.— kallolborah, kevin

Notable participants

  • harshaOriginal proposer and primary respondent who presented CGP 2.0 metrics, negotiated with critics, withdrew and revised the on-chain proposal, and incorporated feedback into RFPs and reporting commitments.
  • kevinMost substantive critic, raising concerns about redundant funding, lack of quality oversight, milestone design, timing of the renewal, and vote representativeness, prompting the proposal's temporary withdrawal.
  • allthecolorsDapps/New Protocol Ideas domain allocator who defended the program's operational choices in detail and engaged extensively with kevin's critiques.
  • DooDomain allocator for Multi-Chain/Cross-Chain and Dev Tooling who supported renewal and later published the domain's RFP.
  • cylonSecurity Tooling domain allocator (OpenZeppelin) who highlighted security benefits of CGP 2.0 and later published security RFPs.
  • kallolborahCGP 2.0 grantee who raised process suggestions (RFP vs open calls, feedback surveys, TVL metrics) and objected to the abrupt cancellation of the renewal vote.
  • robinnagpalGrantee/community member who praised the program and suggested structural improvements like a dual RFP/open track and a retro session.
  • ruchilIncoming Program Manager from Questbook who posted implementation updates and finalized program rollout after the vote passed.
  • blakeGrantee who supported renewal, suggested community engagement improvements, and defended his project against redundancy criticism.
  • w3sCommunity member who proposed adding an external accountability/reporting layer on top of Questbook's role.
Generated by Kvorum
model: claude-sonnet-5
provider: anthropic
profile: anthropic-strong-v1
prompt: v1.0
generated: 2mo ago
Open the thread ↗