I compared each prose claim to the corresponding decoded call. The Reserve Factor actions (indices 1-3) match the description precisely: three markets (presumably BAT, REP, ZRX) each receive _setReserveFactor(5e17), which is exactly 50% as stated, with no unit ambiguity. However, the COMP distribution speed action (index 0) sets _setCompRate to 220000000000000000 = 0.22 COMP/block, while the description explicitly states the proposed speed is 0.44 COMP/block and even shows the daily-total math (0.44 * ~6595 blocks/day ≈ 2880 COMP/day) consistent with 0.44, not 0.22. Since both the prose and calldata express the value in the same units (COMP per block, not basis points or wei-vs-percent), this is a genuine value mismatch rather than a formatting difference — the on-chain change to emissions is twice as large as what is described. This could materially affect COMP incentive distribution beyond what voters were told, so it is flagged as a value_mismatch with high severity. Because three of four actions match perfectly and the mismatched one is directionally the same (a decrease) but numerically off by 2x, I classify the overall proposal as a material_discrepancy rather than severe, since no funds are misdirected and no control is transferred — only a rate parameter differs from its description.