The proposal has two on-chain actions: _supportMarket, which adds the cUSDT market to the Comptroller, and _setPriceOracle, which swaps in a new price oracle contract. Both map directly to the two concrete actions claimed in the description: 'adds Tether as a supported asset' and 'updates the Compound price feed to conservatively peg Tether to $1.' Replacing the entire oracle contract (rather than just adding a single price feed entry) is consistent with how Compound's oracle architecture worked at this time — new oracle contracts were deployed that wrapped the old oracle's logic for existing assets while adding fixed-price logic for the new asset, so the ‘price feed update’ characterization is not misleading given historical context. The 'no collateral factor or reserve factor' claim is consistent with the calldata since _supportMarket does not set a collateral factor (defaults to zero), and no reserve-factor-setting call is present, matching the claim of leaving those at zero/default. The interest rate model and cToken audit details are background/context about an already-deployed contract, not actions this governance proposal executes, so their absence from calldata is expected and not a discrepancy. No numeric or target mismatches were found between the two on-chain calls and the prose. Confidence is high because the proposal is short, specific, and both actions cleanly correspond to explicit prose claims.