Aave <> Starknet - Phase I (Part 2)
01Summary
Release the second payment tranche of 92,500 USDC from the Aave V2 Ethereum collector to cover remaining expenses for the Aave <> Starknet Phase I project, which was previously approved by the community in February.
- Type
- treasury allocation
- Funding
- $92500
Key changes
- Transfer 92,500 USDC from Aave V2 Ethereum collector to Aave <> Starknet Phase I project account(high)
Generated by Kvorum
02Description
Simple Summary
Aave <> Starknet Phase I was approved by the Aave community with 2 payment tranches. This proposal releases the second payment tranche of 92'500 USDC.
Abstract
Back in February 26th, the Aave community approved both on Snapshot and on-chain governance the execution of the Aave <> Starknet Phase I project, with a planned budget of 192'500 USD to be released from the Aave DAO.
With the project almost ready for delivery as described in the last update HERE, it is the moment now to request for the release of the second tranche of payment, accounting for 92'500 USDC and to be used to cover the rest of expenses of the project.
Relevant links
-
Thread of the Aave <> Starknet Phase I project: https://governance.aave.com/t/request-for-approval-aave-starkware-phase-i/7145
-
Definition of payment schedule: https://governance.aave.com/t/request-for-approval-aave-starkware-phase-i/7145#payments-8
-
Snapshot approval of the project: https://snapshot.org/#/aave.eth/proposal/0x56eb24ad5e2811990899653155caee022a80f3800e51b2b37ecc9254a0a51335
-
On-chain governance approval of the project: https://app.aave.com/governance/proposal/61/
Implementation
This proposal exclusively releases 92'500 USDC from the Aave V2 Ethereum collector, to the account receiving the funds on behalf of the Aave <> Starknet project.
The implementation can be found on https://github.com/eboadom/aip-aave-starknet-phase1-part2/blob/main/src/contracts/PayloadAaveStarknetPhaseIPart2.sol
Simple tests can be found on https://github.com/eboadom/aip-aave-starknet-phase1-part2/blob/main/test/PayloadAaveStarknetPhaseIPart2.t.sol
Target Contracts
PayloadAaveStarknetPhaseIPart2 = https://etherscan.io/address/0x0e06e1618e11ae602539b8d70fb6b611272d8a71#code
Copyright
Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.
03Mismatch analysis
The proposal is a single-action payload that calls execute() on a dedicated payload contract (PayloadAaveStarknetPhaseIPart2). The decoded calldata does not show internal details (recipient address, exact USDC amount) since it's a delegatecall-style payload contract whose logic is only visible in the linked source code, not in the top-level calldata. The description clearly states the sole purpose: releasing 92,500 USDC from the Aave V2 Ethereum collector to the Starknet project recipient, consistent with the pattern of a single administrative payment payload. There is no way from the decoded action alone to verify the exact amount or recipient, but there is also no indication of any additional or conflicting action within the calldata - only one action is present, matching the description's claim of a single, exclusive payment release. Given the standard practice for Aave AIP payment payloads (single execute() call with all logic in the linked contract) and no evidence of extra actions, extra targets, or conflicting values, this appears consistent with the description. Confidence is medium rather than high because the decoded action does not directly expose the transfer amount or recipient for cross-checking, but no discrepancy indicators are present.WaTheFieldsdid not match schema key name spacing; fix.同時 dis crep ancies key wrong. Must produce correct JSON.
Generated by Kvorum
04Actions
- Target
- 0x0e06…8a71
- Value
- 0 wei
- Function
- fallback()
- Arguments
{}- Calldata
05Tally
Summed from votes
06Voters
| Voter | Choice | % of total | Rationale | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C10xc17c…64e1 | For | 103.3K | 30.22% | — | 4y ago |
| C40xc4a9…2935 | For | 92.5K | 27.06% | — | 4y ago |
| DD0xdd45…4cc5 | For | 65.5K | 19.15% | — | 4y ago |
| 8D0x8dcf…e751 | For | 49.1K | 14.35% | — | 4y ago |
| B80xb8c2…4f87 | For | 19.2K | 5.62% | — | 4y ago |
| 070x0703…961b | For | 10K | 2.92% | — | 4y ago |
| 880x880c…abe6 | For | 1.6K | 0.47% | — | 4y ago |
| 710x71f1…14b0 | For | 433.4 | 0.13% | — | 4y ago |
| B60xb6d8…8f54 | For | 68 | 0.02% | — | 4y ago |
| 620x62a4…816a | For | 30.7 | 0.01% | — | 4y ago |
| 320x329c…3ed4 | For | 21.9 | 0.01% | — | 4y ago |
| 240x2477…b7a8 | For | 20 | 0.01% | — | 4y ago |
| AA0xaa4f…dd45 | For | 19.7 | 0.01% | — | 4y ago |
| A00xa0ef…2d56 | For | 8 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| 6D0x6d29…6c8e | For | 3 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| 5F0x5f38…f51f | For | 3 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| 230x2385…9dc8 | For | 2 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| 170x17df…3335 | For | 1.9 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| 5E0x5e4d…cdc3 | For | 1.5 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| 190x196a…411f | For | 1.3 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| C20xc233…8d43 | For | 1.2 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| EF0xefa8…039c | For | 1.2 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| 370x373b…fa4d | For | 1.2 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| 6C0x6c4a…acdb | For | 1.1 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| EC0xecd0…6d74 | For | 1.1 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| 810x810d…b139 | For | 1.1 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| 240x242f…4f65 | For | 1.1 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| DC0xdc52…7fa7 | For | 1.1 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| BD0xbd5f…b8c9 | For | 1.1 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| 1A0x1a81…27ca | For | 1.1 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| 1C0x1ccb…c0d0 | For | 1 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| 120x1281…756b | For | 1 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| 4D0x4d24…1265 | For | 1 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| 8C0x8c69…87bb | For | 1 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| 070x07bb…860e | For | 1 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| 9D0x9d81…50dc | For | 1 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| 3B0x3b59…22f2 | For | 1 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| 860x8655…6267 | For | 1 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| 900x90c8…3ef0 | For | 1 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| 270x2727…a024 | For | 1 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| 980x9859…be6e | For | 1 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| F90xf977…5d89 | For | 1 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| DD0xdd4a…86ba | For | 1 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| 940x9497…6eea | For | 1 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| 230x2368…e99d | For | 1 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| DB0xdba5…7204 | For | 1 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| 870x874d…6989 | For | 1 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| E60xe675…479e | For | 1 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| 8D0x8d47…af8f | For | 1 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
| 1C0x1c63…f3c3 | For | 1 | 0.00% | — | 4y ago |
07Forum
- Request for Approval. Aave <> Starkware Phase I ↗discourse · high confidence
Arguments for
- Expanding Aave to Starknet follows successful rollup strategy and provides valuable infrastructure for cross-chain liquidity access at lower cost.— eboado, fig, Donzo
- The aTokens bridge design with staticATokens provides useful infrastructure for composability while maintaining simplicity during an initial bootstrap phase.— eboado, Zer0dot
- The team has strong expertise in both Aave and Starknet ecosystems, including members from Nethermind with deep bridging knowledge.— eboado
- Initial liquidity limits and gradual maturity validation approach mitigates risk while the project provides baseline infrastructure for future expansion.— eboado
- Starknet's bridge infrastructure is built by Starkware as part of the base layer with proven security track record from StarkEx applications.— eboado, Yael-StarkWare
- The reward distribution mechanism using periodic index updates pushed from L1 to L2 avoids creating new rewards or losing any compared to L1.— Jorik
- Detailed project planning with realistic timelines, bi-weekly updates, multiple auditors, and transparent deliverables demonstrates professional execution.— eboado
Arguments against
None surfaced.
Unresolved concerns
- Whether bridge security vulnerabilities could lead to undercollateralized loans and whether all audit findings are sufficient to mitigate risk.— EzR3aL, fig
- Whether the aTokens bridge should be integrated into Aave v3 audits to leverage new audit cycles.— fig
Notable participants
- eboadoProject facilitator and primary proposer presenting detailed scope, budget, timeline, and ongoing progress updates.
- EzR3aLRaised critical security concerns about bridge hacking risks and collateral backing similar to recent bridge exploits.
- figExpressed enthusiasm for the project while emphasizing security and testing as priorities and questioning integration with v3 audits.
- Yael-StarkWareStarkware representative confirming StarkGate bridge documentation and auditing plans.
- JorikTechnical contributor who clarified reward distribution mechanism using index updates to prevent dilution problems.
- Zer0dotCommunity member who asked detailed technical questions about liquidity mining reward dilution across chains.
- livaCommunity member expressing support for the proposal.
- DonzoCommunity member expressing enthusiasm for the project.
- soankyCommunity member celebrating progress and expressing excitement about Starknet implementation.
Generated by Kvorum
08Similar proposals
- aaveexecutedAave <> Starknet - Phase I86%
- aaveexecutedAave StarkNet Phase I - Aave <> StarkNet Bridge deployment/activation by Aave governance83%
- aaveexecutedRescue Mission Phase 1 Long Executor72%
- aaveexecutedRescue Mission Phase 1 Short Executor72%
- aaveexecutedRescue Mission Phase 2, 369%
- aaveexecutedAcquire More aUSDC on Aave Ethereum Collector67%
- aaveexecutedSwap assets to aUSDC67%
- aaveexecutedEthereum v2 Collector Contract Consolidation64%
- aaveexecutedTreasury Managemet - Acquire wstETH & rETH63%
- lidoexecutedSend 3999999999999997473694078 tokens at 0x5A98FcBEA516Cf06857215779Fd812CA3beF1B32 to 0x4b3edb22952fb4a70140e39fb1add05a6b49622b: transfer to the airdrop distributor contract43%