Institute a Voting Delay Period
01Summary
Proposal to increase the voting delay period for Aave governance proposals from 0 to 2 days (172,800 seconds) to allow more time for analysis and review before voting begins on complex proposals.
- Type
- governance change
Key changes
- Set votingDelay parameter to 172,800 seconds (2 days) on core governance contract, creating a formal analysis period before voting can begin on proposals(high)
- Voting will no longer begin immediately upon proposal submission; there will now be a 2-day review window for pre-vote analysis(high)
Notable concerns
- Guardian intervention may be marginally more likely if time-sensitive issues arise during the 2-day delay period
- Risk parameterization changes identified by Gauntlet will experience additional delay until a riskAdmin role is implemented
Generated by Kvorum
02Description
Simple Summary
A proposal to increase the voting delay period for all on-chain governance proposals (AIPs).
Background
Aave governance proposals (AIPs) vary in complexity, scope, and impact. As Aave continues to make progress on its growth trajectory, it is becoming obvious that certain proposals need to allow more time for pre-vote analysis. For instance, AIP-33: Add FEI to Aave V2 was, fortunately, able to be canceled, via delegation removal, rather than needing to use the Aave Guardian.

This month has seen the most governance proposals (9) of any month since Aave V2 has launched with no sign of slowing given the variety of authors and proposal type.
Proposal
A formal analysis period is defined as a non-voting period where a proposal is active (e.g. submitted on-chain). Currently, the votingDelay configured on Aave governance is set to 0 - voting begins immediately when proposals are created.

We propose to set this voting delay to 2 days, in seconds, using the setVotingDelay method on the core governance contract. Setting the votingDelay will cause there to be a new review period between the proposal submission and when voting for that proposal begins.
Potential Side Effects
- The Guardian is marginally more likely to be needed should time sensitive issues arise.
- Gauntlet’s risk parameterization will see a delay from time to identifying a suboptimal risk parameter to executing a change. At least until a
riskAdminrole is implemented.
Implementation
We set the voting delay using setVotingDelay on the core governance contract located at 0xEC568fffba86c094cf06b22134B23074DFE2252c, with a delay of 172800 seconds, or 2 days.
Copyright
Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.
03Mismatch analysis
The proposal describes a single action: calling setVotingDelay with a value of 172800 seconds (2 days) on the Aave governance contract at 0xEC568fffba86c094cf06b22134B23074DFE2252c. The decoded calldata shows exactly one action, calling setVotingDelay(172800) on 0xec568fffba86c094cf06b22134b23074dfe2252c. The function name, argument value, and target address all match (case-insensitive Ethereum addresses are equivalent). There is a minor typographical discrepancy in the description's address string, which appears to contain one extra character compared to a standard 40-hex-character address, but this is clearly a copy-paste/typo issue rather than a substantive redirection, since the calldata's actual target matches the well-known Aave governance contract address referenced elsewhere in the proposal (including the Etherscan link). No other actions, transfers, role grants, or parameter changes are present in the calldata beyond what is described. Given the single, clearly matching action with no hidden side effects, funds movement, or scope changes, this proposal is consistent with its description.
Generated by Kvorum
04Actions
- Target
- 0xec56…252c
- Value
- 0 wei
- Function
- setVotingDelay(uint256)
- Arguments
{ "votingDelay": "172800" }- Calldata
05Tally
Summed from votes
06Voters
| Voter | Choice | % of total | Rationale | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DD0xdd70…8202 | For | 224.3K | 21.71% | — | 5y ago |
| F60xf63e…78c8 | For | 125.9K | 12.18% | — | 5y ago |
| 9B0x9b5e…0499 | For | 110.2K | 10.66% | — | 5y ago |
| C10xc17c…64e1 | For | 103.3K | 10.00% | — | 5y ago |
| 990x990d…f1c2 | For | 100K | 9.67% | — | 5y ago |
| C40xc4a9…2935 | For | 92.5K | 8.95% | — | 5y ago |
| 5B0x5bc9…d76c | For | 84.9K | 8.21% | — | 5y ago |
| 0C0x0c94…297b | For | 83.7K | 8.10% | — | 5y ago |
| FC0xfc56…5e0c | For | 65.2K | 6.31% | — | 5y ago |
| CF0xcfec…28e8 | For | 21K | 2.03% | — | 5y ago |
| 450x458c…730e | For | 10K | 0.97% | — | 5y ago |
| 800x80dc…c146 | For | 3.7K | 0.36% | — | 5y ago |
| 700x704d…a0df | For | 3.5K | 0.33% | — | 5y ago |
| 680x683a…6c02 | For | 3.1K | 0.30% | — | 5y ago |
| F50xf569…271b | For | 1.1K | 0.11% | — | 5y ago |
| 3A0x3a25…e9d2 | For | 590 | 0.06% | — | 5y ago |
| 6C0x6cd7…9248 | For | 156.3 | 0.02% | — | 5y ago |
| 8D0x8d07…a265 | For | 50 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
| AD0xad54…99d1 | For | 42.6 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
| BC0xbca7…e0d5 | For | 20.6 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
| 270x2713…d6e5 | For | 15.3 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
| A00xa0ef…2d56 | For | 8 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
| 780x78b3…447b | For | 6.6 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
| B60xb6e8…9fcd | For | 1.9 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
| 780x78ab…d032 | For | 0.9 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
| 100x102e…67b5 | For | 0.5 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
| DC0xdc7b…c0ca | For | 0 | 0.00% | — | 5y ago |
07Forum
No forum thread is confidently linked to this proposal.
08Similar proposals
- aaveexecutedUse AAVE Ecosystem Reserve to vote YES on proposal to adjust Level 2 Governance requirements75%
- aaveexecutedAdjust Aave Governance Level 2 requirements71%
- aaveexecutedGovernance v2.5 Activation70%
- aaveexecutedAave Governance V3 Activation Short69%
- aavecanceledGovernance V3 Activation68%
- aaveexecutedAave Governance V3 Activation68%
- aavecanceledAave Governance V3 Activation Short67%
- aaveexecutedFire drill proposal Ethereum VotingMachine66%
- aaveexecutedFire drill proposal Avalanche VotingMachine64%
- aaveexecutedFunding Aave Robot for Governance V2 Automation61%