ACI Phase II
01Summary
Proposal to extend collaboration with Aave-chan Initiative (ACI) for 180 days with 375k GHO budget. ACI has produced 90 AIPs in 180 days and contributed to protocol improvements including BUSD/TUSD offboarding (generating ~1M$ for DAO), governance frameworks, and external representation across three focus areas: Skyward (governance proposals), Growth (protocol improvements and asset integrations), and Representation (internal governance support and external events).
- Type
- treasury allocation
- Funding
- $375k GHO
Key changes
- 180-day continuation of ACI services across Skyward, Growth, and Representation pillars(high)
- Budget allocation of 375k GHO to Aave-chan Initiative recipient address 0x57ab7ee15cE5ECacB1aB84EE42D5A9d0d8112922(high)
- Continuation of Skyward services with focus on AIP creation and ecosystem collaboration(medium)
- Growth initiatives targeting Liquid Staking Token diversity, GHO adoption, and L2 integration(medium)
- Representation support for internal governance frameworks and external event participation(medium)
Generated by Kvorum
02Description
Simple Summary
This ARFC proposes the continuation of the collaboration with the Aave-chan Initiative (ACI) for an additional period of 180 days, with a proposed budget of 375k GHO.
Motivation
The ACI has demonstrated significant value to the Aave ecosystem across multiple fronts. This proposal seeks to extend our collaboration, focusing on three primary axes: Skyward, Growth, and Representation.
Skyward:
Skyward has emerged as a cornerstone of Aave's governance, producing 90 AIPs in 180 days. This averages out to one AIP every other day, a testament to the relentless dedication and efficiency of the ACI. Beyond numbers, the ACI has fostered a spirit of collaboration within the Aave ecosystem.
We've co-authored proposals with the vast majority of active DAO service providers, recognized delegates and some active community members. Moreover, our doors have always been open to third-party protocols. By actively welcoming and collaborating with them, we've streamlined the governance process, ensuring that Aave remains inclusive and cohesive in its approach.
What to expect for phase II?
Continuation & extension of the Skyward services.
Growth:
The ACI operates under a guiding principle of "Continuous incremental improvement."
While we acknowledge that we might not be the driving force behind tech breakthroughs like a potential Aave V4 or, recently, the Governance V3 AIP, our daily commitment is unwavering. We aim to make the protocol 1% better every single day, one AIP at a time. It's through these consistent, small steps that we believe Aave can maintain its leadership in the DeFi space.
Our efforts have already borne fruit. The implementation of offboarding plans for assets like BUSD & TUSD stands out. These initiatives not only enhanced protocol safety but also turned a profit, generating close to 1M$ for the DAO. This revenue, in itself, has multiple times repaid the investment made in the ACI. Furthermore, our vigilant oversight of the DAO's finances has ensured efficiency. We've curbed overspending, optimized budgets, and deterred proposals that didn't align with Aave's best interests, saving the DAO a 7-figure amount & ensuring every GHO & DAO $ is well spent.
What to expect for phase II?
The ACI will continue to focus on our continuous incremental improvement doctrine, being a driving force in Aave protocol growth and BD.
For Phase II the main focal points will be on Liquid Staking Tokens diversity with the support of onboarding new assets, GHO growth and adoption with support of synergies and the integration of GHO in both onchain protocols, ramps & L2s.
Representation:
The ACI has actively engaged in both internal and external representation for the Aave DAO.
Internal Representation:
Prior to the ACI's involvement, the DAO too often encountered challenges, such as proposals not reaching the required quorum. Governance activity was subdued, and the operations were notably insular. The ACI introduced several key initiatives:
- Orbit Program: The ACI allocated ~20% of its budget to the Orbit program, focusing on diversity. This program compensates recognized delegates for their contributions, leading to increased participation rates and improved diversity metrics. The frequency of proposals failing due to a lack of quorum has decreased. With the now DAO-funded Orbit program, the DAO has enshrined these benefits
- Governance Guidelines: The ACI contributed to the establishment of the Aave DAO governance guidelines. This effort aimed to bring clarity, predictability, and efficiency to DAO governance. The "Minimal Viable Bureaucracy" ACI Doctrine, ensures a balance between structured governance and accessibility.
- Support for New Delegates: The ACI has extended support to emerging delegate platforms, co-authoring proposals and providing guidance. This collaborative approach has enriched the DAO's ecosystem.
What to Expect from Phase II?
We will continue contributing to the Aave DAO frameworks and supporting DAO active participants seeking a balance between organization & accessibility.
We will also delegate engineering resources for service providers via mini-dapps such as the recent acistreamcollector.com, which allows no code claims of DAO streams.
External Representation:
Externally, the ACI has been a voice for the Aave DAO in various capacities.
- Event Participation: The ACI has participated in and sponsored several global events to share insights and collaborate with industry peers. In 2023, our engagements included:
- Web3DNA (Paris)
- EthDubai 2023
- Prague DeFi Summit/EthPrague
- Stable Summit (Paris)
- EthCC[6] (Paris)
- Dappcon Berlin 2023
- LëtzStake (Luxembourg)
- EthLisbon
- Devconnect Istanbul A detailed list of our engagements can be found here.
- Regulatory Engagement: The ACI's founder holds the position of president of the DeFi committee of the French Lobby ADAN. This role involves dialogues with regulators, institutions, and governments in France and Europe regarding the DeFi sector. The ACI has been involved in discussions related to the "Mica 2" regulation, which addresses DeFi services.
The ACI, as one of the voices for the Aave DAO, has consistently worked towards enhancing the DAO's presence and reputation in the broader ecosystem.
What to Expect from Phase II?
The ACI will continue to be one of the voices of Aave across the globe, supporting devs in hackathons, being one of the DAO voices during events and supporting our brand quality.
Specification
- Recipient: 0x57ab7ee15cE5ECacB1aB84EE42D5A9d0d8112922
- Duration: 180 days
- Budget: 375k GHO
- Scope: Continuation of the ACI's work across Skyward, Growth, and Representation.
References
- Implementation: AaveV3Ethereum
- Tests: AaveV3Ethereum
- Snapshot
- Discussion
Copyright
Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.
03Mismatch analysis
The proposal description outlines a governance funding continuation: 375k GHO over 180 days to the ACI's known recipient address, covering Skyward, Growth, and Representation workstreams. The decoded on-chain action, however, is a single 'forwardPayloadForExecution' call to what appears to be a cross-chain governance forwarder/controller contract, passing a payload ID and target payload address. This is the standard mechanism used by Aave governance to execute payloads (often on other chains or via a payload controller) rather than directly encoding the GHO transfer in this action itself. Because the actual funds-transfer logic (recipient, amount, GHO token approval/transfer) lives inside the referenced payload contract (0xdAbad81aF85554E9ae636395611C58F7eC1aAEc5) and is not visible in this decoded action, I cannot directly verify that the specific budget amount (375k GHO) or recipient address matches what the payload will execute. This is a common and expected pattern for AaveV3Ethereum ACI-phase proposals, where the on-chain action set only shows the forwarding call and the substantive logic is deployed in a separate payload contract referenced in the implementation link. Since there is no visible contradiction between the description and the one decoded action (it does not target a different recipient, nor does it claim an unrelated action), and the mismatch in visibility is due to the nature of the forwarding pattern rather than an actual inconsistency, I classify this as consistent overall. However, confidence is low because the calldata alone does not let us confirm the specific budget or recipient details asserted in the description.
Generated by Kvorum
04Actions
- Target
- 0x9aee…2bc7
- Value
- 0 wei
- Function
- forwardPayloadForExecution((uint256,uint8,address,uint40))
- Arguments
{ "0": [ "1", "1", "0xdAbad81aF85554E9ae636395611C58F7eC1aAEc5", "1" ] }- Calldata
05Tally
Summed from votes
06Voters
No votes recorded yet.
07Forum
No forum thread is confidently linked to this proposal.
08Similar proposals
- aaveexecutedACI Phase IV – “Road to 80”90%
- aaveexecutedACI Ad Astra88%
- aaveexecutedACI Service Provider Proposal81%
- aaveexecutedACI Is Leaving Aave76%
- aaveexecutedSet ACI as Emission Manager for Aave Liquidity Mining programs74%
- aaveexecutedSet ACI as Emission Manager for USDS, aUSDS and awstETH74%
- aaveexecutedSet ACI as Emission Manager on the Avalanche network72%
- aaveexecutedSet ACI as Emission Manager for wstETH & tBTC70%
- aaveexecutedSet Aave Chan Initiative as Emission Manager for fdUSD on BNB Chain Aave V369%
- aaveexecutedMainnet PYUSD Emissions Admin68%