Enable borrow of OP token

The proposal uses Aave's standard cross-chain governance pattern: a single mainnet action calling execute(address) on a bridge/executor contract, passing the address of a payload contract that is expected to contain the actual parameter changes (in this case, enabling borrowing for the OP reserve on Optimism). The decoded calldata only shows this outer call and the payload address argument; the internal logic of the payload contract (0x9c11F54bA3c44ED7945D2405C15060bcD209f53e) is not decoded or available for direct inspection here. This is the typical, expected structure for this type of Aave proposal, and there is no evidence in the visible calldata that contradicts the description's claim of enabling OP borrowing. However, because the actual parameter-setting logic lives inside an undecoded payload contract, I cannot fully verify at the byte level that the payload does exactly and only what the description claims (no more, no less). Given the standard pattern matches expectations and no contrary evidence exists, I assess this as consistent, but confidence is low due to the inability to inspect the payload's internal calls directly.