KVORUM
aaveSource: Aave governor v2 · #315

Chaos Labs Risk Parameter Updates

executedSep 10, 2023, 08:43 AM UTCby320x329c…3ed4

01Summary

AISummary by Kvorumclaude-haiku-4-5

Proposal to reduce Liquidation Thresholds and Loan-To-Value ratios for 14 frozen collateral assets on Aave V2 Ethereum and increase Reserve Factors across 26 assets (both frozen and unfrozen) to encourage migration to V3 and reduce V2 market risks.

Type
parameter change

Key changes

  • Reduce Liquidation Threshold for BAL from 55% to 35%(high)
  • Reduce Liquidation Threshold for BAT from 52% to 40%(high)
  • Reduce Liquidation Threshold for CVX from 40% to 35%(medium)
  • Reduce Liquidation Threshold for ENJ from 60% to 52%(high)
  • Reduce Liquidation Threshold for MANA from 62% to 54%(high)
  • Reduce Liquidation Threshold for REN from 40% to 32%(high)
  • Reduce Liquidation Threshold for xSUSHI from 60% to 57%(medium)
  • Reduce Liquidation Threshold for YFI from 55% to 50%(medium)

Notable concerns

  • LT reductions may cause existing accounts to become eligible for liquidation
  • LINK and DPI omitted from LT reductions due to risk of liquidating larger positions
  • Chaos Labs to publicly communicate planned amendments and list of affected accounts before on-chain execution
ContractsAave V2 Ethereum
Generated by Kvorum
model: claude-haiku-4-5
provider: anthropic
profile: anthropic-fast-v1
prompt: v1.0
generated: 2mo ago
Read the description ↗

02Description

735 words

Simple Summary

A proposal to:

(1) Reduce the Liquidation Threshold (LT) and Loan-To-Value (LTV) for fourteen (14) frozen collateral assets on Aave V2 Ethereum.

(2) Increase Reserve Factors for collateral assets on Aave V2 Ethereum.

Motivation

In line with our ongoing commitment to reducing the potential risks associated with V2 markets and promoting migration to V3, we suggest a phased wind-down of the frozen V2 markets. The following proposal is part of a series of proposals to reduce capital efficiency across V2 collateral assets.

The previous iteration of proposals:

LT Reductions

Implementing a gradual decrease in LTs effectively diminishes the borrowing power for the existing markets. The community has aligned on the aggressive option in the Snapshot, which suggested a LT configuration that optimizes reductions without significantly increasing the number of accounts eligible for liquidation. Following decline in the assets prices since the initial Snapshot, we have modified the proposal to be more conservative than the initially approved update. Please note LINK and DPI are omitted from this proposal, as reducing their LTs would put larger positions at risk of liquidation.

As Liquidation Threshold reductions may lead to user accounts being eligible for liquidations upon their approval, we want to clarify the full implications to the community at each step. Chaos Labs will publicly communicate the planned amendments and list of affected accounts leading to the on-chain execution.

LTV Decrease

For assets where the LTV is not 0, we recommend maintaining the same buffer as the current configuration.

RF Increase

In line with our V2 to V3 migration plan, we propose another iteration of RF increases on Aave V2 Ethereum. By progressively increasing the reserve factors, the interest rate for supplying these assets on V2 will be increasingly less attractive, thus encouraging suppliers to transition positions to V3. In this proposal, we suggest an increase of 5% for all V2 collateral assets.

Specification

Frozen Assets:

AssetCur LTRec LTCurrent LTVRec LTVCurrent RFRec RF
BAL55%35%0030%35%
BAT52%40%0030%35%
CVX40%35%0030%35%
DPI42%No Change0030%35%
ENJ60%52%0030%35%
MANA62%54%0045%50%
REN40%32%0030%35%
xSUSHI60%57%0045%50%
YFI55%50%0030%35%
ZRX45%42%0030%35%
LINK83%No Change70%No Change25%30%
1INCH50%40%40%30%25%30%
UNI77%70%65%58%25%30%
SNX59%49%46%36%40%45%
MKR64%50%59%45%25%30%
ENS57%52%47%42%25%30%

Unfrozen Assets

AssetCurrent RFRecommended RF
FRAX25%30%
GUSD15%20%
LUSD15%20%
sUSD25%30%
USDC15%20%
USDP15%20%
USDT15%20%
CRV25%30%
WBTC25%30%
ETH20%25%

References

Copyright

Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.

03Mismatch analysis

AIMismatch analysis by Kvorumlow confidenceclaude-sonnet-5
Consistent

The proposal follows the standard Aave governance pattern: a single on-chain action that calls execute() on a dedicated payload contract. The actual parameter changes (LT, LTV, and Reserve Factor updates for the 16 frozen and 10 unfrozen assets listed in the specification tables) are implemented inside that payload contract's bytecode, which is not visible in the decoded calldata provided here. Because the decoded action set contains only the generic execute() call with no arguments, there is no way to directly verify each individual LT/LTV/RF value against the prose from the calldata alone. I found no calldata elements that contradict the description (e.g., no unexpected transfers, role grants, or additional targets), and the single action's target and pattern are consistent with what a proposal of this type would produce. Given the lack of granular visibility into the payload's internal logic, I cannot confirm exact numerical matches, so confidence is low. Based on the information available, there is no evidence of a discrepancy, but this assessment should be corroborated by inspecting the linked implementation contract source code directly for full certainty.

Generated by Kvorum
model: claude-sonnet-5
provider: anthropic
profile: anthropic-strong-v1
prompt: v1.0
generated: 2mo ago
Review the decoded actions ↗

04Actions

1 total
#0fallback()chain 0x1
Target
0x4094…3a6b
Value
0 wei
Function
fallback()
Arguments
{}
Calldata

05Tally

Summed from votes

Voters41
VP participating430.8K
Outcome (current)For
Current support100%

06Voters

41 total
Filter:
VoterChoice% of totalRationale
130x13bd…8548For109K25.30%—3y ago
320x329c…3ed4For106.2K24.66%—3y ago
B80xb83b…cf5cFor84.6K19.63%—3y ago
EA0xea17…6676For46.5K10.80%—3y ago
2C0x2cc1…4df1For28.4K6.60%—3y ago
570x57ab…2922For24K5.57%—3y ago
E40xe459…e666For20K4.64%—3y ago
EZezr3al.eth0x8659…7d0eFor9K2.09%—3y ago
180x1855…98baFor3K0.70%—3y ago
DF0xdf06…4977For27.30.01%—3y ago
460x46a9…901bFor26.10.01%—3y ago
160x16c9…ca6cFor14.90.00%—3y ago
A70xa772…6171For2.10.00%—3y ago
6F0x6f42…8b67Against20.00%—3y ago
3E0x3ecf…bc12For1.80.00%—3y ago
600x60fd…3a18For1.40.00%—3y ago
010x0151…c3b9For1.20.00%—3y ago
7E0x7e77…f7caFor0.60.00%—3y ago
2A0x2a71…fcf0For0.60.00%—3y ago
510x5149…a55bFor0.40.00%—3y ago
100x106d…c5c4For0.30.00%—3y ago
960x96c3…5c42For0.20.00%—3y ago
430x4330…e1d9For0.10.00%—3y ago
0C0x0c32…10c7For0.10.00%—3y ago
C30xc31d…856aFor0.10.00%—3y ago
C70xc7f7…d6faFor0.10.00%—3y ago
9A0x9afe…d035For0.10.00%—3y ago
AF0xaff2…58baFor0.10.00%—3y ago
B90xb984…76abFor0.10.00%—3y ago
340x3496…126bFor0.10.00%—3y ago
500x50d2…5318For0.10.00%—3y ago
8A0x8ae4…d10aFor0.10.00%—3y ago
F00xf06a…87a4For00.00%—3y ago
EC0xec8e…39efFor00.00%—3y ago
FC0xfc7d…b5eeFor00.00%—3y ago
370x3774…a343For00.00%—3y ago
330x339a…7d2fFor00.00%—3y ago
840x8448…e239For00.00%—3y ago
1A0x1a74…b800For00.00%—3y ago
B80xb8e8…c7deFor00.00%—3y ago
280x28d9…8151For00.00%—3y ago
Showing 41

07Forum

No forum thread is confidently linked to this proposal.