KVORUM
aaveSource: Aave governance v3 · #347

wS and BTC.b Interest Rate Curve Optimization

executedJul 30, 2025, 12:46 PM UTCby570x57ab…2922

01Summary

AISummary by Kvorumclaude-haiku-4-5

Chaos Labs proposes adjusting interest rate curves for wS on Aave V3 Sonic and BTC.b on Aave V3 Avalanche to enable leveraged yield strategies and respond to organic borrowing demand. Key changes include increasing Optimal Utilization from 45% to 80%, reducing Slope1 to 4%, lowering Slope2 to 80%, and increasing BTC.b's Reserve Factor to 50%. For wS, the supply cap will double from 50M to 100M.

Type
parameter change

Key changes

  • wS UOptimal increased from 45% to 80% on Sonic to unlock ~$30M in additional borrowing capacity(high)
  • wS Slope1 reduced from 7.00% to 4.00% on Sonic to align with stS staking yield and facilitate revenue generation(high)
  • wS Slope2 decreased from 300% to 80% on Sonic to manage rate volatility above UOptimal(medium)
  • wS supply cap doubled from 50M to 100M on Sonic to support anticipated new borrowing activity(high)
  • BTC.b UOptimal increased from 45% to 80% on Avalanche to respond to organic borrowing demand(high)
  • BTC.b Slope1 reduced from 7.00% to 4.00% on Avalanche(high)
  • BTC.b Slope2 decreased from 300% to 80% on Avalanche(medium)
  • BTC.b Reserve Factor increased from 20% to 50% on Avalanche(high)

Notable concerns

  • Primary risk identified for wS: increasing UOptimal could create situations where utilization reaches 100% during stress periods with high collateral utilization, potentially preventing liquidations; however, wS liquidity has remained stable and deep over the past month and a half
ContractsAave V3 Sonic - wSAave V3 Avalanche - BTC.b
Generated by Kvorum
model: claude-haiku-4-5
provider: anthropic
profile: anthropic-fast-v1
prompt: v1.0
generated: 2mo ago
Read the description ↗

02Description

574 words

Simple Summary

Chaos Labs recommends adjusting wS’s IR curve on Aave V3 Sonic and BTC.b’s IR curve on Aave V3 Avalanche to better facilitate leveraged yield and directional trading strategies. This proposal will follow the Direct-to-AIP process.

Motivation

wS (Sonic)

To this point, wS has primarily been used as collateral to borrow USDC.e, and has been borrowed against USDC.e.

However, the recent listing of stS alongside the ensuing listing of wOS creates a new use case for wS as a debt asset. Namely, users may wish to borrow wS against such LSTs to enhance their yield.

One of the most important changes will be adjusting wS’s UOptimal upwards, allowing for a greater proportion of the wS supplied to be borrowed at a cheaper rate. However, this is only feasible if wS’s liquidity is strong enough to support its use as collateral; the primary risk of increasing UOptimal is creating a situation in which utilization reaches 100% during times of stress, coupled with significant wS collateral utilization, during which liquidations would not be able to be processed. wS’s liquidity has remained stable and relatively deep over the past month and a half.

As a result, in accordance with the underlying asset volatility, we recommend increasing the asset’s UOptimal to 80% from the current 45%. This change alone will open up roughly $30M of wS that can be borrowed before breaching the kink.

Additionally, we recommend adjusting Slope1 such that it is marginally lower than the stS staking yield to facilitate optimal revenue generation in accordance with prospective use cases.

With a median stS staking APY over the last 30 days of 4.56%, we thus recommend setting the Slope1 to 4.00%.

To ensure that there is not significant rate volatility just above UOptimal, we also recommend decreasing Slope2 from 300% to 80%, finding that 80% is still sufficient to encourage users to repay loans/suppliers to deposit when the asset is highly utilized.

Finally, anticipating that these changes will bring significant new borrowing activity, we recommend doubling the supply cap from 50M to 100M.

BTC.b (Avalanche)

Over the past few months, BTC.b has experienced a notable increase in organic (non-recursive) borrowing demand, primarily driven by WAVAX-collateralized debt positions. This contrasts with earlier periods, where borrowing activity was largely fueled by recursive BTC.b collateral positions, incentivized through external rewards.

To further stimulate borrowing demand, we recommend implementing similar interest rate curve adjustments to those previously applied to BTC-denominated markets exhibiting strong borrowing activity. Specifically, we propose modifying the default tail asset configuration by increasing the Optimal Utilization Rate from 45% to 80%, reducing Slope1 to 4%, and raising the Reserve Factor to 50%. These changes align with the BTC-denominated strategy outlined in the referenced ARFC and are supported by the observed uptick in demand.

Specification

wS (Sonic)

ParameterCurrentRecommended
UOptimal45%80%
Slope17.00%4.00%
Slope2300.00%80.00%

BTC.b (Avalanche)

ParameterCurrentRecommended
UOptimal45%80%
Slope17.00%4.00%
Slope2300.00%80.00%
Reserve Factor20%50%

References

Copyright

Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.

03Mismatch analysis

AIMismatch analysis by Kvorum

A calldata-vs-description analysis is not generated yet. Review the decoded actions →

04Actions

0 total

This proposal carries no on-chain actions.

05Tally

Summed from votes

Voters0
VP participating0
Outcome (current)—
Current support—

06Voters

0 total

No votes recorded yet.

07Forum

No forum thread is confidently linked to this proposal.