KVORUM
aaveSource: Aave governance v3 · #133

Lido Ethereum Instance Activation

executedJul 28, 2024, 12:00 PM UTCby570x57ab…2922

01Summary

AISummary by Kvorumclaude-haiku-4-5

This proposal activates a new Aave V3 instance on Ethereum dedicated to the Lido Alliance, specifically designed to support wstETH and WETH with leverage looping capabilities. The instance includes a high-LTV eMode category (93.50% LTV) for ETH correlated assets, will be bootstrapped with wETH liquidity from the Ahab program, and includes 15,000 GHO as a service fee for deployment.

Type
protocol addition
Funding
$15000

Key changes

  • Deploy new Aave V3 instance on Ethereum for Lido Alliance with wstETH and WETH as only assets(high)
  • Create eMode category for ETH correlated assets with 93.50% LTV and 95.50% LQT(high)
  • List wstETH with 80% LTV, 81% LT, and 6% liquidation bonus(high)
  • List WETH with 82% LTV, 83% LT, and 5% liquidation bonus(high)
  • Set ACI as emission admin for WETH and aWETH rewards for LM program(medium)
  • Set CapsPlusRisk Steward contract as Risk Admin with ACI as administrator(medium)
  • Bootstrap instance with wETH liquidity from Ahab program(medium)
  • Set PROTOCOL_GUARDIAN as temporary Pool Admin(low)

Notable concerns

  • High LTV of 93.50% in eMode carries significant liquidation risk for leveraged stETH loopers
  • Aggressive risk parameters with 12,000 wstETH borrow cap and high 85% slope 2 rate may lead to capital inefficiency
  • Temporary Pool Admin role requires future governance action to set permanent admin
  • Reliance on Lido's incentive programs to bootstrap liquidity creates dependency on external incentives
Contracts0x683fdf51d5898f92317f870b25a6a4df67dc58abEthereum V3 Incentives ControllerEthereum V3 PoolAddressesProviderRegistry
Generated by Kvorum
model: claude-haiku-4-5
provider: anthropic
profile: anthropic-fast-v1
prompt: v1.0
generated: 2mo ago
Read the description ↗

02Description

628 words

Simple Summary

This AIP proposal activates the Ethereum Lido V3.1 instance, as discussed in [ARFC] Deploy a Lido Aave v3 Instance.

Motivation

Aave and Lido have historically seen symbiotic growth, with stETH being one of the premier collaterals on Aave and leveraged staking being one of the most profitable use cases for both Aave DAO and Lido users.

Lido is in the process of launching the Lido Alliance, which will reward novel use cases of staked ETH and support further growth of the Lido ecosystem. This ARFC proposal suggests that Aave supports Lido Alliance efforts by deploying a new Aave V3 ETH market for Lido. This Aave v3 instance will be designed and tuned to support stETH leverage loopers. The deployment will only include wstETH and wETH assets with E-Mode enabled.

Lido has committed incentive programs and ecosystem support for this instance in order to bootstrap liquidity and promote additional programs within the Lido Alliance.

This instance will be bootstrapped with wETH from the Ahab program to attract wETH liquidity.

wETH suppliers will also be proposed to be eligible to a dedicated Merit Boost

Specification

The Lido Alliance’s Aave v3 instance payload implements the following:

  • Pre-execution:

    • Sets Ethereum V3 Incentives Controller to manage Ethereum Lido incentives.
    • Register Ethereum Lido instance in Ethereum V3 PoolAddressesProviderRegistry.
  • Execution:

    • Add eMode category for ETH correlated assets:

      • LTV: 93.50%
      • LQT: 95.50%
      • LiqBonus: 1%
      • Oracle: Not set
      • Label : 'Eth correlated'
    • Listing of wstETH and WETH tokens.

      The table below illustrates the configured risk parameters for wstETH and WETH tokens.

ParameterwstETHWETH
Isolation Modefalsefalse
BorrowableENABLEDENABLED
Collateral Enabledtruetrue
Supply Cap (wstETH)650,000900,000
Borrow Cap (wstETH)12,000810,000
Debt CeilingUSD 0USD 0
LTV80 %82 %
LT81 %83 %
Liquidation Bonus6 %5 %
Liquidation Protocol Fee10 %10 %
Reserve Factor5 %10 %
Base Variable Borrow Rate0 %0 %
Variable Slope 13.5 %2.5 %
Variable Slope 285 %85 %
Uoptimal45 %90 %
Stable BorrowingDISABLEDDISABLED
Stable Slope10 %0 %
Stable Slope20 %0 %
Base Stable Rate Offset0 %0 %
Stable Rate Excess Offset0 %0 %
Optimal Stable To Total Debt Ratio0 %0 %
FlashloanableENABLEDENABLED
Siloed BorrowingDISABLEDDISABLED
Borrowable in IsolationDISABLEDDISABLED
Oracle0xB4aB0c94159bc2d8C133946E7241368fc2F2a0100x5f4eC3Df9cbd43714FE2740f5E3616155c5b8419
  • Post-execution:
    • Set Ethereum PROTOCOL_GUARDIAN as temporary Pool Admin of Ethereum Lido instance.
    • Set Risk Admin to CapsPlusRisk Steward contract, with ACI as admin of this steward that can bump caps with a delay of 2 days per cap update.
    • Set ACI as emission admin of WETH and aWETH rewards for LM program.
    • Seed initial wstETH and WETH token liquidity for security measures.
    • Send 15.000 GHO as service fee for Catapulta deployment service provider.

References

Copyright

Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.

03Mismatch analysis

AIMismatch analysis by Kvorumlow confidenceclaude-sonnet-5
Consistent

The proposal contains a single decoded on-chain action: a parameterless call to execute() on a dedicated payload contract. This is the standard Aave governance pattern in which all detailed logic (asset listings, eMode configuration, risk parameter setting, admin role assignments, fee transfers, etc.) is encoded in the payload contract's bytecode and executed via delegatecall, rather than being passed as calldata arguments visible to this analysis. Because the decoded action exposes no parameters, it is not possible to directly cross-verify the specific numeric values (LTV, LT, caps, eMode parameters, GHO fee amount, etc.) or addresses described in the prose against the calldata. No red flags are apparent: the single action's target and function signature (execute()) are consistent with the described payload deployment referenced in the linked implementation and test files, and there is no evidence of the calldata doing something different from what is described (e.g., no unexplained transfers or admin grants outside what execute() would perform per the described payload). Given the inherent opacity of this delegatecall pattern, confidence in a granular value-by-value comparison is low, so per instructions this analysis is recorded as low confidence and treated as consistent rather than surfaced as a warning.“discrepancies”:[]}. (placeholder text removed)

Generated by Kvorum
model: claude-sonnet-5
provider: anthropic
profile: anthropic-strong-v1
prompt: v1.0
generated: 2mo ago
Review the decoded actions ↗

04Actions

1 total
#0fallback()chain 0x1
Target
0x683f…58ab
Value
0 wei
Function
fallback()
Arguments
{}
Calldata

05Tally

Summed from votes

Voters0
VP participating0
Outcome (current)—
Current support—

06Voters

0 total

No votes recorded yet.

07Forum

No forum thread is confidently linked to this proposal.